Skip to main content
DetentionReceipts

Follow the money

Buy the walls, pay the operator

Four SEC-filed purchase agreements now establish exact prices totaling $2,205,828,830, 1,603,438 square feet, four SK2 access relationships, CBRE as the seller-side broker, and Chicago Title as escrow/title provider. The government appraisals, appraisal reviewers, negotiation records, and post-sale management rate changes remain outside the reviewed public record.

This audit publishes what the purchase agreements, company disclosures and one official award snapshot state. It does not establish fair value, overpayment, duplicate compensation, unlawful conduct, or any causal connection between political money and an acquisition. Purchase prices are never added to federal award values, obligations, outlays, company revenue, lobbying totals or political-transaction totals.

01

What the records state

Each line below is carried by a cited record. Nothing here is an inference about value, intent, or legality.

  • 01

    All four purchase agreements disclose exact purchase prices, building areas, due-diligence terms, expense allocation, and federal ownership.

  • 02

    Both July diligence periods began under February 1 access agreements with SK2 LLC and expired March 3, 121 days before closing.

  • 03

    The July agreements exclude seller appraisals and internal memoranda from conveyed property while allowing the buyer to obtain its own appraisal at buyer cost.

  • 04

    The federal buyer became responsible for applicable ownership, operation, and maintenance charges after closing and no longer owed real estate taxes while exempt.

  • 05

    As of August 5, CoreCivic said ICE had not yet modified the four management contracts to reflect the ownership change.

  • 06

    Prairie sold for an agreement price of $495,639,588 after CoreCivic reported a $26.683 million June 30 net carrying value for the property, excluding transferable equipment and other assets; the earlier $22.557 million March 31 state is kept as history.

  • 07

    Four filed agreements state four exact prices, which sum to $2,205,828,830 across 7,187 published beds and 1,603,438 agreement square feet.

  • 08

    SK2 is the access-and-confidentiality counterparty named in all four filed agreements; a separate ICE real-property acquisition-services contract to SK2 appears in official records, but its property scope remains unresolved and its contract carries no property assignment.

This audit does not establish

  • DHS overpaid for any facility.
  • CoreCivic was paid twice for the same property cost.
  • The sales were corrupt, unlawful, a kickback, or a quid pro quo.
  • The appraisals were manipulated.
  • The assessed-value or carrying-value multiples establish fair value.
  • SK2 set or approved the purchase prices for all four facilities.
  • A political contribution caused or influenced any acquisition.
  • Specific facility-sale dollars funded a specific share repurchase.
  • The federal buyer inherited undisclosed defects.

Conclusions this audit withholds (37)

Read every withheld conclusion and the record that would settle it

  • Not established: DHS overpaid for any of the four properties.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The purchase prices were fair market value.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The purchase prices were below fair market value.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The appraisals were manipulated, inflated, or corrupt.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: No appraisal existed.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The appraisal process was legally sufficient or legally defective.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: County assessed values prove overpayment or fair value.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Prairie’s accounting carrying value proves profit, gain, or fair value.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: SK2 appraised any property.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: SK2 selected any property for purchase.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: SK2 set, recommended, or negotiated any purchase price.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: SK2 received a commission, success fee, or property-specific share of the purchase prices.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The four access relationships are formal assignments under SK2’s federal contract.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The entire SK2 contract was allocated among these four properties.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: CBRE appraised the properties or advised the buyer.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: CBRE inflated the prices or had an undisclosed conflict.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The amount of CBRE’s commission or compensation.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Chicago Title appraised or valued the properties.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The existence of a title commitment proves there were no title defects.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: All contemplated surveys, environmental work, inspections, and reports were completed.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Seller representations were independently verified in full.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The agreements establish that no environmental or structural problems existed.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The government assumed every cost after closing.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The seller retained no operational or maintenance responsibility after closing.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The property prices include or exclude future management compensation in a known amount.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: CoreCivic was paid twice for the same property costs.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Post-sale management rates stayed the same or changed by a specific amount.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The four sales directly funded CoreCivic’s share repurchase.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: A political contribution, lobbying activity, or revolving-door relationship caused any sale.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The transactions were bribery, kickbacks, bid rigging, quid pro quo, or political payoff.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The exact $2,205,828,830 aggregate is a company-reported exact total rather than a derived sum.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: The reported local tax loss equals the total public fiscal effect.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: James Grossmann had authority beyond the notice-copy role established in the agreements.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Tamim Chowdhury alone selected the prices or controlled the full approval process.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Lucibeth Mayberry alone set CoreCivic’s sale strategy or prices.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: Jennifer Chen or Chicago Title approved the economic reasonableness of the purchases.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

  • Not established: No alternative property or lease option was considered.

    The reviewed public records do not establish this conclusion. Evidence needed · Primary appraisal, negotiation, approval, assignment, invoice, closing, or conflict records appropriate to the claim.

02

Four filed agreements. Four exact prices.

Every one of the four 2026 purchases is now carried at the exact dollar its SEC-filed purchase and sale agreement states, with the building area the same agreement prints. The four-property total is the sum of those four agreement dollars.

Four filed agreements. Four exact prices.The four-property total is a deterministic sum of four exact SEC-filed agreement prices. It is not a company-reported exact aggregate; CoreCivic's own rounded summaries stay at their original precision.

Four SEC-filed purchase agreements with exact prices, published beds, agreement building areas, and derived unit arithmetic.
PropertyClosedAgreement priceBedsBuilding sq ftDerived $/bedDerived $/sq ft
California City Immigration Processing CenterCaliforniaJuly 2, 2026$732,571,392.002,560519,263$286,160.70$1,410.79
Otay Mesa Detention CenterCaliforniaJuly 2, 2026$739,208,496.001,994455,158$370,716.40$1,624.07
Prairie Correctional FacilityMinnesotaAugust 4, 2026$495,639,588.001,600437,232$309,774.74$1,133.58
Midwest Regional Reception CenterKansasAugust 4, 2026$238,409,354.001,033191,785$230,793.18$1,243.11
Four agreements, derived sum$2,205,828,830.007,1871,603,438$306,919.28$1,375.69

Every per-bed, per-square-foot and square-feet-per-bed figure on this page · Derived arithmetic, not an appraisal or fair-value estimate.

California City Immigration Processing Center

California City Purchase and Sale Agreement · closed July 2, 2026

Exact agreement price
$732,571,392.00 · exact purchase-agreement dollar
Previously published
$732,600,000.00 — a source-faithful rounded company disclosure, superseded by the filed agreement dollar
Beds as published
2,560
Agreement building area
519,263 sq ft
Derived square feet per bed
202.84 · Derived arithmetic, not an appraisal or fair-value estimate.
Seller
CoreCivic, Inc.
Buyer
United States of America and its assigns, by and through the Department of Homeland Security
Access-agreement counterparty
SK2 LLC · access agreement documented; federal contract allocation not established
Seller-side broker
CBRE, seller under a separate agreement; commission amount not obtained
Escrow and title
Chicago Title Insurance Company
County assessed value
$171,500,000.00 · tax comparator, not a market value
Management contract horizon
August 2027 (month certainty)
Post-sale management modification
not obtained through 2026-08-28

What this does not establish

The agreement establishes the transaction, price, area, named parties, access period, broker, escrow/title role, and the categories of diligence contemplated. Derived unit arithmetic is not an appraisal. The agreement does not disclose an appraisal value, appraiser identity, review appraisal, price-negotiation analysis, property-specific SK2 fee, broker commission, or a finding that the government overpaid.

Otay Mesa Detention Center

Otay Mesa Purchase and Sale Agreement · closed July 2, 2026

Exact agreement price
$739,208,496.00 · exact purchase-agreement dollar
Previously published
$739,200,000.00 — a source-faithful rounded company disclosure, superseded by the filed agreement dollar
Beds as published
1,994
Agreement building area
455,158 sq ft
Derived square feet per bed
228.26 · Derived arithmetic, not an appraisal or fair-value estimate.
Seller
CoreCivic, Inc.
Buyer
United States of America and its assigns, by and through the Department of Homeland Security
Access-agreement counterparty
SK2 LLC · access agreement documented; federal contract allocation not established
Seller-side broker
CBRE, seller under a separate agreement; commission amount not obtained
Escrow and title
Chicago Title Insurance Company
County assessed value
$164,900,000.00 · tax comparator, not a market value
Reported local tax effect
$2,100,000.00 annual property-tax loss estimate, of which $800,000.00 school share · attributed-secondary
Management contract horizon
December 2029 (month certainty), extension option five years
Post-sale management modification
not obtained through 2026-08-28

What this does not establish

The agreement establishes the transaction, price, area, named parties, access period, broker, escrow/title role, and the categories of diligence contemplated. Derived unit arithmetic is not an appraisal. The agreement does not disclose an appraisal value, appraiser identity, review appraisal, price-negotiation analysis, property-specific SK2 fee, broker commission, or a finding that the government overpaid.

Prairie Correctional Facility

Prairie Purchase and Sale Agreement · closed August 4, 2026

Exact agreement price
$495,639,588.00 · exact purchase-agreement dollar
Previously published
$495,600,000.00 — a source-faithful rounded company disclosure, superseded by the filed agreement dollar
Beds as published
1,600
Agreement building area
437,232 sq ft
Derived square feet per bed
273.27 · Derived arithmetic, not an appraisal or fair-value estimate.
Seller
CoreCivic, Inc.
Buyer
United States of America and its assigns, by and through the Department of Homeland Security
Access-agreement counterparty
SK2 LLC · access agreement documented; federal contract allocation not established
Seller-side broker
CBRE, seller under a separate agreement; commission amount not obtained
Escrow and title
Chicago Title Insurance Company
Company net carrying value, June 30, 2026
$26,683,000.00 · accounting comparator, not fair value
Management contract horizon
August 2031 (month certainty)
Post-sale management modification
not obtained through 2026-08-28

What this does not establish

The agreement establishes the transaction, price, area, named parties, access period, broker, escrow/title role, and the categories of diligence contemplated. Derived unit arithmetic is not an appraisal. The agreement does not disclose an appraisal value, appraiser identity, review appraisal, price-negotiation analysis, property-specific SK2 fee, broker commission, or a finding that the government overpaid.

Midwest Regional Reception Center

Midwest Purchase and Sale Agreement · closed August 4, 2026

Exact agreement price
$238,409,354.00 · exact purchase-agreement dollar
Previously published
$238,400,000.00 — a source-faithful rounded company disclosure, superseded by the filed agreement dollar
Beds as published
1,033
Agreement building area
191,785 sq ft
Derived square feet per bed
185.66 · Derived arithmetic, not an appraisal or fair-value estimate.
Seller
CoreCivic, Inc.
Buyer
United States of America and its assigns, by and through the Department of Homeland Security
Access-agreement counterparty
SK2 LLC · access agreement documented; federal contract allocation not established
Seller-side broker
CBRE, seller under a separate agreement; commission amount not obtained
Escrow and title
Chicago Title Insurance Company
Management contract horizon
September 2027 (month certainty)
Post-sale management modification
not obtained through 2026-08-28

What this does not establish

The agreement establishes the transaction, price, area, named parties, access period, broker, escrow/title role, and the categories of diligence contemplated. Derived unit arithmetic is not an appraisal. The agreement does not disclose an appraisal value, appraiser identity, review appraisal, price-negotiation analysis, property-specific SK2 fee, broker commission, or a finding that the government overpaid.

The same four purchases in the earlier acquisition table, with scope exclusions

All four prices on this page are exact purchase-agreement dollars taken from SEC-filed agreements. The four-property total is a deterministic sum of those four agreement dollars: it is a derived figure, not a company-reported exact aggregate. CoreCivic's own rounded summaries of the same transactions stay at the precision the company published.

Four 2026 detention property purchases, with the precision class of each price.
PropertyClosedPricePrecisionBedsBuilding sq ft
California City Detention FacilityCAJuly 2, 2026$732,571,392.00Exact purchase-agreement dollar2,560519,263
Otay Mesa Detention CenterCAJuly 2, 2026$739,208,496.00Exact purchase-agreement dollar1,994455,158
Prairie Correctional FacilityMNAugust 4, 2026$495,639,588.00Exact purchase-agreement dollar1,600437,232
Midwest Regional Reception CenterKSAugust 4, 2026$238,409,354.00Exact purchase-agreement dollar1,033191,785
Four filed agreements, derived sum$2,205,828,830.00derived sum of four exact SEC-filed agreement dollars7,187

California City Detention Facility

Exact purchase-agreement dollar · closed July 2, 2026

Purchase price
$732,571,392.00
Previously published (rounded)
$732,600,000.00 — superseded by the agreement dollar above
Beds as published
2,560
Derived price per bed
$286,160.70 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Derived price per sq ft
$1,410.79 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
County assessed value
$171,500,000.00 · comparator, not an appraisal (secondary-reporting-of-county-records)
Management contract horizon
August 2027 (month certainty)
Post-sale contract modification
not-yet-modified-as-of-2026-08-05
Pre-sale payment formula
Not established in reviewed sources

California assessed value is not a market appraisal. Proposition 13 can cause assessed values to diverge materially from current market value.

What this does not establish

The price, bed, square-foot and assessed-value comparisons are descriptive. They do not establish fair value, overpayment, duplicated compensation, or corruption.

Otay Mesa Detention Center

Exact purchase-agreement dollar · closed July 2, 2026

Purchase price
$739,208,496.00
Previously published (rounded)
$739,200,000.00 — superseded by the agreement dollar above
Beds as published
1,994
Derived price per bed
$370,716.40 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Derived price per sq ft
$1,624.07 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
County assessed value
$164,900,000.00 · comparator, not an appraisal (secondary-reporting-of-county-records)
Reported local tax effect
$2,100,000.00 annual property-tax loss estimate, of which $800,000.00 school share · San Diego County assessor estimate reported by NBC 7 (attributed-secondary)
Management contract horizon
December 2029 (month certainty), extension option five years
Post-sale contract modification
not-yet-modified-as-of-2026-08-05
Pre-sale payment formula
Not established in reviewed sources

California assessed value is not a market appraisal. Proposition 13 can cause assessed values to diverge materially from current market value.

What this does not establish

The price, bed, square-foot, assessed-value and tax comparisons are descriptive. They do not establish fair value, overpayment, duplicated compensation, or corruption.

Prairie Correctional Facility

Exact purchase-agreement dollar · closed August 4, 2026

Purchase price
$495,639,588.00
Previously published (rounded)
$495,600,000.00 — superseded by the agreement dollar above
Beds as published
1,600
Derived price per bed
$309,774.74 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Derived price per sq ft
$1,133.58 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Net carrying value, June 30, 2026
$26,683,000.00 · accounting measure. Net carrying value reported in the company's June 30, 2026 filing, excluding equipment and other transferable assets.
Management contract horizon
August 2031 (month certainty)
Post-sale contract modification
not-yet-modified-as-of-2026-08-05
Pre-sale payment formula
Not established in reviewed sources

A net carrying value is an accounting measure at a stated date, not an appraisal, closing book basis, replacement cost, or fair value. Activation work and other assets may have changed the basis, and the difference between price and carrying value is neither a premium nor a profit finding.

What this does not establish

The sale-to-carrying-value multiple is an accounting comparison, not an appraisal or a finding of overpayment. The award, sale and contract commencement are separate events.

Midwest Regional Reception Center

Exact purchase-agreement dollar · closed August 4, 2026

Purchase price
$238,409,354.00
Previously published (rounded)
$238,400,000.00 — superseded by the agreement dollar above
Beds as published
1,033
Derived price per bed
$230,793.18 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Derived price per sq ft
$1,243.11 · derived arithmetic, not appraisal
Management contract horizon
September 6, 2027 (exact certainty)
Post-sale contract modification
not-yet-modified-as-of-2026-08-05
Pre-sale payment formula
Not established in reviewed sources

What this does not establish

The reviewed company disclosures establish the pre-sale payment structure and sale chronology, but not the exact rate schedule or post-sale repricing.

This audit covers four reviewed real-property transactions and nothing else. The facilities below are named here only to record that no reviewed source places them in a sale, and that their appearance elsewhere in this project is an award or inspection record, not an ownership record. An exclusion is not a finding that no transaction exists; it states that none is established in the sources currently indexed.

  • Golden State Annex

    CaliforniaNOT ONE OF THE FOUR TRANSACTIONS
    Sale record
    None established in the sources currently indexed.
    Ownership
    Unresolved. No reviewed source in this dataset establishes who owns, operates, or manages the site, and no purchase agreement, sale disclosure, or transfer record names it.
    Why readers look for it here
    Golden State Annex is a California contract detention facility carried in this project's award and inspection work, so it can be mistaken for one of the California properties in this audit. It is not. The two California properties here are California City Detention Facility and Otay Mesa Detention Center.
    Role that is established
    THE GEO GROUP, INC. is the recipient on award 70CDCR26FR0000042, which covers Golden State Annex and Mesa Verde ICE Processing Center together and allocates nothing between them. Recipient and place of performance are award fields, not an owner or operator record.

    What this does not establish

    Nothing here establishes that Golden State Annex was bought, sold, or publicly acquired, that any party owns or operates it, or that it carries any share of the four purchase prices. Its exclusion is also not a finding that the facility is unaffected by the ownership changes described elsewhere on this page.

03

What the agreements establish, and what they do not

The dividing line between a document and a conclusion, stated before anything else on this page is read.

What the filed agreements establish

  • CoreCivic sold four named detention properties to the United States through DHS under four SEC-filed agreements.
  • The four exact agreement prices total $2,205,828,830.
  • The four agreements describe a combined 1,603,438 square feet and 7,187 published beds.
  • Each agreement references a property-specific access and confidentiality agreement between CoreCivic and SK2 LLC.
  • Each agreement names CBRE as the only seller-side broker entitled to transaction compensation and makes the seller responsible for commissions under a separate agreement.
  • Each agreement joins Chicago Title as escrow agent and requires a Chicago Title commitment if the buyer elected title coverage.
  • Each agreement is signed for CoreCivic by Lucibeth Mayberry, for the federal buyer by Tamim Chowdhury, and for escrow acknowledgement by Jennifer Chen.
  • Each buyer notice provision copies James Grossmann of SK2.
  • The agreements identify extensive seller-document categories and permit buyer-funded appraisal, environmental, survey, title, and other diligence.
  • CoreCivic states it expects to continue managing all four under existing ICE contracts whose terms may be modified because ownership changed.

What they do not establish

  • The appraised fair-market value of any property.
  • Who appraised or reviewed any property.
  • That the sale prices were fair, inflated, low, or above an approved appraisal.
  • That SK2 formally received any property assignment under its federal contract.
  • That SK2 performed any specific appraisal, inspection, environmental study, or price negotiation.
  • The amount of CBRE compensation or any conflict involving the broker.
  • The contents of title commitments, surveys, environmental reports, structural reports, or settlement statements.
  • Whether management pricing retained, removed, or repriced property-ownership costs after sale.
  • Any causal relationship between the acquisitions and political finance, lobbying, revolving-door employment, debt repayment, or share repurchases.
04

Prices restated at agreement precision

Figures published earlier at company-rounded precision now appear as the exact agreement dollar. The earlier numbers were source-faithful rounded disclosures, not errors.

These are append-only corrections. The earlier figures were source-faithful rounded company disclosures, correct at that precision, now superseded by filed agreement precision.

  1. 01

    Prairie purchase price

    amount-precision
    Previously published
    495,600,000
    Now published
    495,639,588

    Basis · SEC-filed Prairie purchase agreement states the price to the dollar.

  2. 02

    Midwest purchase price

    amount-precision
    Previously published
    238,400,000
    Now published
    238,409,354

    Basis · SEC-filed Midwest purchase agreement states the price to the dollar.

  3. 03

    Four-property aggregate purchase price

    derived-amount-precision
    Previously published
    2,205,800,000
    Now published
    2,205,828,830

    Basis · Derived sum of four exact agreement prices. It is not a company-reported exact aggregate.

  4. 04

    Prairie building square feet

    new-primary-field
    Previously published
    Not previously published
    Now published
    437,232

    Basis · SEC-filed Prairie agreement states approximately 437,232 square feet.

  5. 05

    Midwest building square feet

    new-primary-field
    Previously published
    Not previously published
    Now published
    191,785

    Basis · SEC-filed Midwest agreement states approximately 191,785 square feet.

  6. 06

    SK2 property-access relationship count

    relationship-coverage
    Previously published
    2
    Now published
    4

    Basis · All four SEC-filed agreements reference property-specific access agreements with SK2 LLC.

  7. 07

    Ownership-cost-transfer scope

    scope-correction
    Previously published
    California City, Otay Mesa
    Now published
    California City Immigration Processing Center, Otay Mesa Detention Center, Prairie Correctional Facility, Midwest Regional Reception Center

    Basis · All four filed agreements contain the relevant pre-/post-closing cost and federal tax-exemption terms.

  8. 08

    Prairie accounting comparator

    newer-source-state
    Previously published
    value: 21,590,000; asOf: 2025-12-31
    Now published
    value: 26,683,000; asOf: 2026-06-30

    Basis · Q2 2026 Form 10-Q prints the newer June 30 net carrying value. Preserve older states as history rather than silently deleting them.

  9. 09

    CoreCivic property-sale financial events

    amount-precision
    Previously published
    California City: 732,600,000; Otay Mesa: 739,200,000; Prairie: 495,600,000; Midwest: 238,400,000
    Now published
    California City Immigration Processing Center: 732,571,392; Otay Mesa Detention Center: 739,208,496; Prairie Correctional Facility: 495,639,588; Midwest Regional Reception Center: 238,409,354

    Basis · Use exact agreement dollars on property-specific sale events. Keep approximate gain and net-proceeds figures at company-reported precision.

The two July restatements as first published

The earlier figures were the company's own rounded numbers, correctly reported at that precision. All four purchase and sale agreements filed as exhibits state the price to the dollar, so the exact value supersedes the rounded one for every property. The four-property total shown on this page is the sum of those four agreement dollars, not a company-reported exact aggregate.

05

Due diligence, as written in the agreements

Four access agreements, four diligence deadlines, four closings — with what each agreement permitted the buyer to do and what the seller made available.

California City Immigration Processing Center

Access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 1, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. March 3, 2026

    Contractual diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

  3. July 2, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
151 days
Diligence expiry to closing
121 days
Buyer could obtain at its own cost
survey or plan, environmental site assessment, appraisal, title examination, other buyer due-diligence expenses
Buyer termination right
Buyer could terminate if, in its sole discretion, it was not satisfied with the seller documents or inspections before the diligence deadline.
Reinspection
Buyer was entitled to re-inspect before closing.
Sale condition
As-is, where-is, and subject to all faults, subject to the express representations, warranties, deed, and closing documents.
Inspections permitted
Buyer and its agents, consultants, employees, contractors and representatives.
Seller document categories named (15)
  • applications, certificates, designations, and energy audits
  • permits and regulatory approvals required for lawful operation
  • environmental reports, regulatory correspondence, and reporting documents
  • structural reports
  • building maintenance reports
  • tax assessments, abatement appeals, and current/prior two-year tax bills
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • guarantees and warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation concerning the property
  • reciprocal easement and CC&R agreements
  • current budget and anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey and legal description
  • site plans, building plans, as-built plans, and specifications
Categories excluded from conveyed property (9)
  • seller appraisals
  • seller internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies and related proceeds
  • tax refunds and credits for periods before closing
  • claims and causes of action arising before closing
  • employee records
  • accounts receivable accruing before closing

Otay Mesa Detention Center

Access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 1, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. March 3, 2026

    Contractual diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

  3. July 2, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
151 days
Diligence expiry to closing
121 days
Buyer could obtain at its own cost
survey or plan, environmental site assessment, appraisal, title examination, other buyer due-diligence expenses
Buyer termination right
Buyer could terminate if, in its sole discretion, it was not satisfied with the seller documents or inspections before the diligence deadline.
Reinspection
Buyer was entitled to re-inspect before closing.
Sale condition
As-is, where-is, and subject to all faults, subject to the express representations, warranties, deed, and closing documents.
Inspections permitted
Buyer and its agents, consultants, employees, contractors and representatives.
Seller document categories named (15)
  • applications, certificates, designations, and energy audits
  • permits and regulatory approvals required for lawful operation
  • environmental reports, regulatory correspondence, and reporting documents
  • structural reports
  • building maintenance reports
  • tax assessments, abatement appeals, and current/prior two-year tax bills
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • guarantees and warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation concerning the property
  • reciprocal easement and CC&R agreements
  • current budget and anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey and legal description
  • site plans, building plans, as-built plans, and specifications
Categories excluded from conveyed property (9)
  • seller appraisals
  • seller internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies and related proceeds
  • tax refunds and credits for periods before closing
  • claims and causes of action arising before closing
  • employee records
  • accounts receivable accruing before closing

Prairie Correctional Facility

Access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 26, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. April 13, 2026

    Contractual diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

  3. August 4, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
159 days
Diligence expiry to closing
113 days
Buyer could obtain at its own cost
survey or plan, environmental site assessment, appraisal, title examination, other buyer due-diligence expenses
Buyer termination right
Buyer could terminate if, in its sole discretion, it was not satisfied with the seller documents or inspections before the diligence deadline.
Reinspection
Buyer was entitled to re-inspect before closing.
Sale condition
As-is, where-is, and subject to all faults, subject to the express representations, warranties, deed, and closing documents.
Inspections permitted
Buyer and its agents, consultants, employees, contractors and representatives.
Seller document categories named (15)
  • applications, certificates, designations, and energy audits
  • permits and regulatory approvals required for lawful operation
  • environmental reports, regulatory correspondence, and reporting documents
  • structural reports
  • building maintenance reports
  • tax assessments, abatement appeals, and current/prior two-year tax bills
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • guarantees and warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation concerning the property
  • reciprocal easement and CC&R agreements
  • current budget and anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey and legal description
  • site plans, building plans, as-built plans, and specifications
Categories excluded from conveyed property (9)
  • seller appraisals
  • seller internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies and related proceeds
  • tax refunds and credits for periods before closing
  • claims and causes of action arising before closing
  • employee records
  • accounts receivable accruing before closing

Midwest Regional Reception Center

Access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. April 21, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. June 5, 2026

    Contractual diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

  3. August 4, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
105 days
Diligence expiry to closing
60 days
Buyer could obtain at its own cost
survey or plan, environmental site assessment, appraisal, title examination, other buyer due-diligence expenses
Buyer termination right
Buyer could terminate if, in its sole discretion, it was not satisfied with the seller documents or inspections before the diligence deadline.
Reinspection
Buyer was entitled to re-inspect before closing.
Sale condition
As-is, where-is, and subject to all faults, subject to the express representations, warranties, deed, and closing documents.
Inspections permitted
Buyer and its agents, consultants, employees, contractors and representatives.
Seller document categories named (15)
  • applications, certificates, designations, and energy audits
  • permits and regulatory approvals required for lawful operation
  • environmental reports, regulatory correspondence, and reporting documents
  • structural reports
  • building maintenance reports
  • tax assessments, abatement appeals, and current/prior two-year tax bills
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • guarantees and warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation concerning the property
  • reciprocal easement and CC&R agreements
  • current budget and anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey and legal description
  • site plans, building plans, as-built plans, and specifications
Categories excluded from conveyed property (9)
  • seller appraisals
  • seller internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies and related proceeds
  • tax refunds and credits for periods before closing
  • claims and causes of action arising before closing
  • employee records
  • accounts receivable accruing before closing

What a named category does not prove · NOT OBTAINED

A document category or a contractual right in an agreement does not establish that every contemplated document existed, was obtained, was adequate, or was created by SK2. No inspection report, environmental assessment, survey, structural report, appraisal, or settlement statement for any of the four properties is in the reviewed record.

Diligence terms in the earlier record format

California City Detention Facility

Access agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 1, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. March 3, 2026

    Contractual due-diligence period expired

  3. July 2, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
151 days
Diligence expiry to closing
121 days
Buyer could obtain at own cost
appraisal, survey or plan, environmental site assessment, title examination
Sale condition
as-is, where-is, subject-to-all-faults, subject to stated representations and disclosures
Buyer termination right
sole-discretion termination for unsatisfactory diligence or inspections
Seller broker
CBRE, paid by seller
Seller document categories made available
  • permits and regulatory approvals
  • environmental reports and correspondence
  • structural reports
  • building-maintenance reports
  • tax assessments and appeals
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation
  • current budget
  • anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey
  • site and building plans
  • as-built plans and specifications
Categories the agreement excluded from conveyed property
  • seller appraisals
  • internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies
  • pre-close claims
  • pre-close accounts receivable

Otay Mesa Detention Center

Access agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 1, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. March 3, 2026

    Contractual due-diligence period expired

  3. July 2, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
151 days
Diligence expiry to closing
121 days
Buyer could obtain at own cost
appraisal, survey or plan, environmental site assessment, title examination
Sale condition
as-is, where-is, subject-to-all-faults, subject to stated representations and disclosures
Buyer termination right
sole-discretion termination for unsatisfactory diligence or inspections
Seller broker
CBRE, paid by seller
Seller document categories made available
  • permits and regulatory approvals
  • environmental reports and correspondence
  • structural reports
  • building-maintenance reports
  • tax assessments and appeals
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation
  • current budget
  • anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey
  • site and building plans
  • as-built plans and specifications
Categories the agreement excluded from conveyed property
  • seller appraisals
  • internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies
  • pre-close claims
  • pre-close accounts receivable

Prairie Correctional Facility

Access agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. February 26, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. April 13, 2026

    Contractual due-diligence period expired

  3. August 4, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
159 days
Diligence expiry to closing
113 days
Buyer could obtain at own cost
appraisal, survey or plan, environmental site assessment, title examination
Sale condition
as-is, where-is, subject-to-all-faults, subject to stated representations and disclosures
Buyer termination right
sole-discretion termination for unsatisfactory diligence or inspections
Seller broker
CBRE, paid by seller
Seller document categories made available
  • permits and regulatory approvals
  • environmental reports and correspondence
  • structural reports
  • building-maintenance reports
  • tax assessments and appeals
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation
  • current budget
  • anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey
  • site and building plans
  • as-built plans and specifications
Categories the agreement excluded from conveyed property
  • seller appraisals
  • internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies
  • pre-close claims
  • pre-close accounts receivable

Midwest Regional Reception Center

Access agreement with SK2 LLC

  1. April 21, 2026

    Access and confidentiality agreement effective

  2. June 5, 2026

    Contractual due-diligence period expired

  3. August 4, 2026

    Agreement signed and sale closed

Access agreement to closing
105 days
Diligence expiry to closing
60 days
Buyer could obtain at own cost
appraisal, survey or plan, environmental site assessment, title examination
Sale condition
as-is, where-is, subject-to-all-faults, subject to stated representations and disclosures
Buyer termination right
sole-discretion termination for unsatisfactory diligence or inspections
Seller broker
CBRE, paid by seller
Seller document categories made available
  • permits and regulatory approvals
  • environmental reports and correspondence
  • structural reports
  • building-maintenance reports
  • tax assessments and appeals
  • service contracts
  • title reports
  • warranties
  • certificates of occupancy
  • pending litigation
  • current budget
  • anticipated capital expenditures
  • ALTA survey
  • site and building plans
  • as-built plans and specifications
Categories the agreement excluded from conveyed property
  • seller appraisals
  • internal memoranda
  • privileged communications
  • proprietary software and systems
  • insurance policies
  • pre-close claims
  • pre-close accounts receivable

Appraisals and condition records · NOT OBTAINED

No government appraisal, review appraisal, engagement letter, independent government estimate, structural report, environmental assessment or capital budget for any of the four properties is in the reviewed record. The July agreements excluded seller appraisals and internal memoranda from conveyed property, and permitted the buyer to obtain its own appraisal at its own cost; whether it did so is not established.

The gap between the end of a contractual diligence period and closing is a term of the agreement. It does not establish that inspections stopped, that the buyer waived review, or that anything was concealed. Each agreement permitted inspections by the buyer and its agents, consultants, employees, contractors and representatives, allowed pre-closing reinspection, and permitted the buyer to obtain its own appraisal, survey, environmental assessment and title examination at its own cost. Whether any specific document was obtained, was adequate, or was created by SK2 is not established by the reviewed record.

06

Who stood between the seller and the buyer

The named parties in all four agreements: seller, buyer, access counterparty, seller-side broker, escrow and title provider, and the signatories as printed. Compensation is published only where a record states it.

Residential addresses printed in the agreements' notice clauses are not republished here or in any export.

07

What the valuation file holds, property by property

One row per record type, one column per property. Every cell states a retrieval state, never an absence finding and never a value the reviewed record does not carry.

Not obtained means this file does not hold the record. It never means the record did not exist, was not prepared, was unlawfully withheld, or would prove misconduct.

Valuation-evidence states for each property: what the reviewed file holds and what it does not hold.
RecordCalifornia City Immigration Processing CenterOtay Mesa Detention CenterPrairie Correctional FacilityMidwest Regional Reception Center
Exact purchase agreementObtained$732,571,392.00The filed agreement states the exact purchase price.Obtained$739,208,496.00The filed agreement states the exact purchase price.Obtained$495,639,588.00The filed agreement states the exact purchase price.Obtained$238,409,354.00The filed agreement states the exact purchase price.
Government appraisalNot obtainedNo government appraisal report is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo government appraisal report is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo government appraisal report is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo government appraisal report is in the reviewed public record.
Review appraisalNot obtainedNo review appraisal or approval sheet is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo review appraisal or approval sheet is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo review appraisal or approval sheet is in the reviewed public record.Not obtainedNo review appraisal or approval sheet is in the reviewed public record.
Appraiser identityNot obtainedNo appraiser or appraisal firm is named in the filed agreement.Not obtainedNo appraiser or appraisal firm is named in the filed agreement.Not obtainedNo appraiser or appraisal firm is named in the filed agreement.Not obtainedNo appraiser or appraisal firm is named in the filed agreement.
Appraisal engagement and invoiceNot obtainedNo appraisal engagement letter, scope, fee, or invoice was obtained.Not obtainedNo appraisal engagement letter, scope, fee, or invoice was obtained.Not obtainedNo appraisal engagement letter, scope, fee, or invoice was obtained.Not obtainedNo appraisal engagement letter, scope, fee, or invoice was obtained.
Independent government estimateNot obtainedNo independent government estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo independent government estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo independent government estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo independent government estimate was obtained.
Just-compensation estimateNot obtainedNo property-specific just-compensation estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo property-specific just-compensation estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo property-specific just-compensation estimate was obtained.Not obtainedNo property-specific just-compensation estimate was obtained.
Negotiation memorandum, offers and counteroffersNot obtainedNo negotiation memorandum, offer/counteroffer history, or price recommendation was obtained.Not obtainedNo negotiation memorandum, offer/counteroffer history, or price recommendation was obtained.Not obtainedNo negotiation memorandum, offer/counteroffer history, or price recommendation was obtained.Not obtainedNo negotiation memorandum, offer/counteroffer history, or price recommendation was obtained.
Buy-versus-lease analysisNot obtainedNo buy-versus-lease or ownership-alternatives analysis was obtained.Not obtainedNo buy-versus-lease or ownership-alternatives analysis was obtained.Not obtainedNo buy-versus-lease or ownership-alternatives analysis was obtained.Not obtainedNo buy-versus-lease or ownership-alternatives analysis was obtained.
Lifecycle-cost modelNot obtainedNo discounted lifecycle-cost or ownership-cost model was obtained.Not obtainedNo discounted lifecycle-cost or ownership-cost model was obtained.Not obtainedNo discounted lifecycle-cost or ownership-cost model was obtained.Not obtainedNo discounted lifecycle-cost or ownership-cost model was obtained.
Title commitmentRequired by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreement required a Chicago Title commitment; the commitment itself was not obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreement required a Chicago Title commitment; the commitment itself was not obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreement required a Chicago Title commitment; the commitment itself was not obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreement required a Chicago Title commitment; the commitment itself was not obtained.
SurveyBuyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain a survey at its own cost; no buyer survey was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain a survey at its own cost; no buyer survey was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain a survey at its own cost; no buyer survey was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain a survey at its own cost; no buyer survey was obtained.
Environmental assessmentBuyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain an environmental assessment; no buyer assessment was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain an environmental assessment; no buyer assessment was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain an environmental assessment; no buyer assessment was obtained.Buyer could obtain; buyer record not obtainedThe buyer could obtain an environmental assessment; no buyer assessment was obtained.
Structural and condition reportsSeller-document category named; specific reports not obtainedThe seller-document package included structural and maintenance report categories; specific reports were not obtained.Seller-document category named; specific reports not obtainedThe seller-document package included structural and maintenance report categories; specific reports were not obtained.Seller-document category named; specific reports not obtainedThe seller-document package included structural and maintenance report categories; specific reports were not obtained.Seller-document category named; specific reports not obtainedThe seller-document package included structural and maintenance report categories; specific reports were not obtained.
Joint settlement statementRequired by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreements required joint settlement statements; none was obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreements required joint settlement statements; none was obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreements required joint settlement statements; none was obtained.Required by agreement; underlying record not obtainedThe agreements required joint settlement statements; none was obtained.
Post-sale management rate schedule or modificationNot obtainedNo post-sale rate schedule or ownership-change pricing modification was obtained.Not obtainedNo post-sale rate schedule or ownership-change pricing modification was obtained.Not obtainedNo post-sale rate schedule or ownership-change pricing modification was obtained.Not obtainedNo post-sale rate schedule or ownership-change pricing modification was obtained.
County assessed value (comparator, not an appraisal)Obtained — secondary reporting$171,500,000.00County assessed value used only as a non-appraisal comparator.Obtained — secondary reporting$164,900,000.00County assessed value used only as a non-appraisal comparator.No record of this type applies to this property.No record of this type applies to this property.
Company accounting carrying value (comparator, not fair value)No record of this type applies to this property.No record of this type applies to this property.Obtained — party-filed primary record$26,683,000.00 · as of June 30, 2026Company accounting carrying value used only as a non-appraisal comparator.No record of this type applies to this property.

General federal context

42 U.S.C. § 4651 generally describes appraisal before negotiation and an agency just-compensation amount not below its approved appraisal; the Department of Justice Yellow Book and GSA materials describe federal appraisal, review, and real-property acquisition processes. These are general frameworks. Without the DHS legal and acquisition file, this page draws no conclusion about exact applicability, waiver, compliance, or noncompliance.

Attributed company language

CoreCivic has said independent appraisers used a federal process and that the government reviewed the work. That is the company's statement. It is not an appraisal report and not independent verification.

08

Acquisition, ownership, management and capital chronology

Five semantic lanes on one date axis: government action, ownership change, management, company-reported debt repayment and capital allocation. Order only — the records do not trace money from one lane into another, and each lane names the documents we do not hold.

Shared chronology does not establish that proceeds from one event funded another. The facility sales and capital-allocation events are shown in chronological proximity. The reviewed public records do not trace specific government purchase dollars into the share repurchase.

The lanes are separate accounting worlds: a purchase price, a company-reported repayment and a repurchase authorization measure different things and are never added together. Two events sharing a date are two records, not a transaction.

18 dated events across 5 lanes, ordered by date only. On wide screens every lane shares one date axis with one column per date on record. The axis is ordinal, not proportional: equal column widths do not mean equal elapsed time.

2026-01-07

  1. 2026-01-07 · Government award / acquisition action

    ICE awarded SK2 a real-property acquisition-services contract, confirmed by an official award snapshot

    observed-official-snapshot

2026-02-01

  1. 2026-02-01 · Government award / acquisition action

    California City and Otay Mesa access agreements with SK2 became effective

    observed

2026-02-26

  1. 2026-02-26 · Government award / acquisition action

    Prairie access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 became effective

    observed

2026-03-03

  1. 2026-03-03 · Government award / acquisition action

    California City and Otay Mesa diligence periods expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

2026-03-31

  1. 2026-03-31 · Property ownership change

    Prairie net carrying value reported as $22.557 million while idle

    observed-company-filing

2026-04-13

  1. 2026-04-13 · Government award / acquisition action

    Prairie diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

2026-04-21

  1. 2026-04-21 · Government award / acquisition action

    Midwest access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 became effective

    observed

2026-06-05

  1. 2026-06-05 · Government award / acquisition action

    Midwest diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

2026-06-30

  1. 2026-06-30 · Property ownership change

    Prairie net carrying value reported as $26.683 million

    observed-company-filing

2026-07-02

  1. 2026-07-02 · Property ownership change

    CoreCivic said it expected approximately $1.1 billion in net proceeds from the California City and Otay Mesa asset sales.

    $1,100,000,000.00approximately, expected after taxes and transaction costs

    attributed

    Does not establish: Expected net proceeds are not an audited final cash-flow trace and do not establish how each dollar was later used.

  2. 2026-07-02 · Property ownership change

    California City and Otay Mesa purchase agreements were signed and both sales closed

    observed

2026-08-03

  1. 2026-08-03 · Management and operation

    CoreCivic was awarded the Prairie ICE management contract

    attributed-company-disclosure

2026-08-04

  1. 2026-08-04 · Property ownership change

    Prairie and Midwest purchase agreements were signed and both sales closed; CoreCivic expanded its share-repurchase authorization

    attributed-company-disclosure

    The same disclosure also reported an expanded share-repurchase authorization, shown in the capital lane. The records place the two on one date; they do not connect them.

  2. 2026-08-04 · Share repurchase and capital allocation

    The board increased CoreCivic's share-repurchase authorization by $500 million, bringing the aggregate authorization to $1.2 billion and leaving $755.8 million available.

    $500,000,000.00additional authorization

    observed

    Does not establish: An authorization does not require the company to repurchase the full amount and is not a completed repurchase.

2026-08-05

  1. 2026-08-05 · Management and operation

    CoreCivic said the four management contracts had not yet been modified for federal ownership

    attributed-company-disclosure

  2. 2026-08-05 · Debt repayment disclosure

    CoreCivic said it used a portion of the July facility-sale net proceeds to repay $270 million on its revolver and $100 million on an incremental term loan.

    $370,000,000.00company-reported repayment from a portion of July net proceeds

    attributed

    Does not establish: This is company-reported capital allocation and not a federal expenditure category.

2026-08-10

  1. 2026-08-10 · Share repurchase and capital allocation

    CoreCivic entered a $500 million accelerated share repurchase and said it would make the payment on August 10, 2026, with an initial delivery of approximately 12.4 million shares.

    $500,000,000.00contractual payment to dealer

    observed

    Does not establish: The public records do not trace specific DHS purchase dollars into the repurchase. This is a capital-allocation chronology, not transaction-level source-of-funds tracing.

2026-08-11

  1. 2026-08-11 · Management and operation

    Prairie management contract was scheduled to commence

    attributed-forward-looking

Government award / acquisition action

Evidence gaps in this lane

  • What values and assumptions appear in the government appraisals and review appraisals?Records not held: final and draft appraisals; appraisal engagement letters; review appraisals; comparable sales; income approach; replacement-cost approach; capitalization and discount rates; extraordinary assumptions.Conclusion blocked: No fair-value or overpayment conclusion.
  • Why did DHS choose purchase rather than continued private ownership, lease, or new construction?Records not held: buy-versus-lease analysis; lifecycle cost model; net-present-value analysis; independent government estimate; decision memorandum; sensitivity cases.Conclusion blocked: No claim that purchase was more or less economical.
  • What property and deliverables were assigned to SK2 under contract 70CMSW26C00000002?Records not held: statement of work; justification and approval; modifications; invoices; property assignments; appraiser and consultant subcontracts; conflict disclosures.Conclusion blocked: SK2 remains a documented relationship lead, not a facility-specific fee allocation.

Property ownership change

Evidence gaps in this lane

  • What is contained in the schedules and similar attachments omitted from the SEC-filed agreements?Records not held: Schedule 5.1; Schedule D; title and survey schedules; personal-property lists; disclosure schedules; closing exhibits.Conclusion blocked: The public packet cannot claim complete property or diligence scope.
  • What deferred maintenance, environmental issues, capital needs, and condition findings did DHS accept?Records not held: structural reports; maintenance reports; environmental assessments; capital budgets; inspection reports; condition credits; closing adjustments.Conclusion blocked: No claim that DHS inherited hidden defects or paid a condition premium.
  • What purchase agreements and diligence terms governed Prairie and Midwest?Records not held: executed purchase agreements; access agreements; appraisals; closing statements; property-condition documents; ownership-change contract modifications.Conclusion blocked: July agreement terms cannot be projected onto the August sales.

Management and operation

Evidence gaps in this lane

  • How did ICE change management prices when the government assumed property ownership costs?Records not held: last pre-sale price schedule; first post-sale price schedule; ownership-change modifications; fixed monthly amount; per diem; maintenance allocation; insurance and utility allocation; capital expenditure allocation.Conclusion blocked: No paid-twice or duplicate-cost conclusion.

Debt repayment disclosure

Share repurchase and capital allocation

Flat chronology with full source citations

  1. January 7, 2026

    ICE awarded SK2 a real-property acquisition-services contract, confirmed by an official award snapshot

    observed-official-snapshot

  2. February 1, 2026

    California City and Otay Mesa access agreements with SK2 became effective

    observed

  3. February 26, 2026

    Prairie access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 became effective

    observed

  4. March 3, 2026

    California City and Otay Mesa diligence periods expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

  5. March 31, 2026

    Prairie net carrying value reported as $22.557 million while idle

    observed-company-filing

  6. April 13, 2026

    Prairie diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

  7. April 21, 2026

    Midwest access and confidentiality agreement with SK2 became effective

    observed

  8. June 5, 2026

    Midwest diligence period expired unless terminated earlier

    observed

  9. June 30, 2026

    Prairie net carrying value reported as $26.683 million

    observed-company-filing

  10. July 2, 2026

    California City and Otay Mesa purchase agreements were signed and both sales closed

    observed

  11. August 3, 2026

    CoreCivic was awarded the Prairie ICE management contract

    attributed-company-disclosure

  12. August 4, 2026

    Prairie and Midwest purchase agreements were signed and both sales closed; CoreCivic expanded its share-repurchase authorization

    attributed-company-disclosure

  13. August 5, 2026

    CoreCivic said the four management contracts had not yet been modified for federal ownership

    attributed-company-disclosure

  14. August 11, 2026

    Prairie management contract was scheduled to commence

    attributed-forward-looking

These events are ordered by date only. Sequence is not causation: nothing here establishes that the SK2 award produced a purchase, that the Prairie contract award produced the Prairie sale, or that sale proceeds funded a repurchase.

09

Who carries the ownership cost

The filed agreements allocate ownership, operation and maintenance charges between seller and buyer at closing.

Before closing — seller carried

  • real estate taxes
  • insurance
  • electricity
  • gas
  • oil
  • water
  • sewer
  • normal ownership expenses
  • normal operation expenses
  • normal maintenance expenses

After closing — federal buyer carried

  • applicable ownership expenses
  • applicable operation expenses
  • applicable maintenance expenses
  • insurance
  • utilities

federal buyer exempt; real estate taxes cease while the exemption applies

Applies to all 4 filed agreements · California City Immigration Processing Center, Otay Mesa Detention Center, Prairie Correctional Facility, Midwest Regional Reception Center

Open question

Which property-cost, capital-recovery, insurance, tax, utility and maintenance components were removed from or retained in the ICE management prices after ownership transferred?

What this does not establish

The cost transfer does not establish that DHS assumed every operational cost, that CoreCivic retained none, or that ICE paid the same ownership cost twice. The pre-sale and post-sale rate schedules and modifications are required to test that question.

10

Post-sale management repricing

The government took on ownership cost across all four agreements. CoreCivic says it expects to keep managing all four under existing ICE contracts whose terms may be modified because ownership changed. No post-sale rate schedule or ownership-change modification has been obtained, so this page publishes nothing about whether prices stayed the same, rose, or fell.

Facilities sold, management continuing
4
Post-sale rate schedules obtained
0
Ownership-change modification instruments obtained
0

Company statement as of August 5, 2026

CoreCivic and ICE had not yet modified the management contracts for the four facilities to reflect the ownership change; company guidance incorporated an estimate.

Attributed company disclosure · publication state material-gap-publishable

What this does not establish

The absence of a modification as of August 5 does not establish that rates remained unchanged, that automatic pricing provisions did not apply, or that duplicate compensation occurred.

Pre-sale and post-sale price schedules · NOT OBTAINED

No pre-sale price schedule, post-sale price schedule, fixed monthly rate, per-diem rate, or ownership-change modification instrument has been obtained for any of the four facilities. Until those records exist in the file, this page publishes no conclusion about whether management prices changed after the government assumed ownership cost.

11

Comparators, not valuations

Assessed values and accounting carrying values sit beside the prices. Neither is an appraisal, and neither can establish what a property was worth.

July agreements, exact dollars
$1,471,779,888.00

Two filed agreements

July beds / sq ft
4,554 / 974,421
July derived price per bed
$323,183.99

Derived arithmetic, not appraisal

July derived price per sq ft
$1,510.41

Derived arithmetic, not appraisal

Purchase price beside non-appraisal comparators, with each comparator's kind.
PropertyPurchase priceComparatorComparator kindDerived multiple
California City Detention Facility$732,571,392.00$171,500,000.00county-assessed-value4.27×
Otay Mesa Detention Center$739,208,496.00$164,900,000.00county-assessed-value4.48×
Prairie Correctional Facility$495,639,588.00$26,683,000.00company-accounting-carrying-value18.58×

Assessed values and accounting carrying values are not appraisals. A county assessed value reflects an assessment regime, and under California's Proposition 13 it can diverge materially from current market value. A net carrying value is a book measure at a stated date that excludes specified transferable assets. Neither can establish what a property was worth or what it should have sold for.

Prairie's comparator is the company's June 30, 2026 net carrying value. Carrying value is an accounting measure at a stated date, not a fair-market appraisal. The comparison is not a premium, a discount, a profit, a gain, or a fair-value multiple, and it cannot establish overpayment.

  • Earlier reported state · $22,557,000.00 as of March 31, 2026. Published here earlier from the March 31, 2026 idle-facility table; kept as history.

Appraised value · NOT OBTAINED

No appraisal for any of the four properties is in the reviewed record, so no fair-value figure appears anywhere on this page. The multiples above compare a purchase price to an assessment or a book value, which are different measures of different things.

12

The acquisition-services lead

SK2 LLC appears in both filed access agreements and holds a separate ICE real-property acquisition-services contract. Identity and value are confirmed by an official snapshot; scope is not.

SK2 LLC

Observed in the filed agreements · California City Immigration Processing Center, Otay Mesa Detention Center, Prairie Correctional Facility, Midwest Regional Reception Center

counterparty to the property-specific access and confidentiality agreements referenced by all four filed purchase agreements; copied on buyer notices. Access agreement documented; federal contract allocation not established.

Evidence status · observed-sec-agreement

ICE contract 70CMSW26C00000002

SK2 LLC · Department of Homeland Security (ICE)

Confirmed by official award snapshot

Award ID
70CMSW26C00000002
Recipient
SK2 LLC
Recipient UEI
H4WHPLHWHYQ4
Base obligation at signing
$5,980,800 on 2026-01-07
Cumulative obligations
$6,279,840 through modification P00002 (2026-06-04), as reported in the official snapshot
Period of performance
2026-01-07 to 2026-09-04
Awarding agency
Department of Homeland Security
Contract type
Definitive contract

Carried only by official-data mirrors — review pending

Award description
Acquisition of real-property services to purchase existing structures for ICE operating requirements supporting ICE-OAFM. · review-pending mirror
Initial award value
$5,980,800 — the base obligation, not the current total · review-pending mirror
Pricing type
Firm-fixed-price · review-pending mirror
Competition
Sole source, one offer received · review-pending mirror
Place of performance
San Diego, California — an administrative code that identifies no property, facility, site visit, appraisal or contract allocation · review-pending mirror
CAGE code
01P83 · review-pending mirror

Official retrieval

Endpoint
https://api.usaspending.gov/api/v2/search/spending_by_award/
Retrieved
2026-08-21
HTTP status / bytes
200 · 964 bytes
Payload sha256
3932370a71d60c3a569251f641b19ed15969e2cacb6c3f1aeed546a9dd601cb4
Rows / exact award matches
1 / 1
Parser version
wave12-1

The official award-search snapshot confirms award identity, recipient, current value, period, agency and contract type. It carries no statement of work, modification history, competition record or property assignment, so contract scope remains unresolved.

Canonical award page on usaspending.gov

The timing, function and agreement references establish a high-value records lead. The reviewed public record does not establish that this federal contract was assigned to all four CoreCivic purchases or how its fee was allocated by property.

What this does not establish

This page does not establish that SK2 appraised all four facilities; that SK2 negotiated every purchase price; that the sole-source award caused the facility purchases; that the entire $6.28 million contract belongs to these four transactions.

13

What is missing, and what that costs the analysis

Each gap names the records that would resolve it and the conclusion that stays unpublished until they exist.

  • What values and assumptions appear in the government appraisals and review appraisals?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (8)
    • final and draft appraisals
    • appraisal engagement letters
    • review appraisals
    • comparable sales
    • income approach
    • replacement-cost approach
    • capitalization and discount rates
    • extraordinary assumptions

    Effect on publication · No fair-value or overpayment conclusion.

  • Why did DHS choose purchase rather than continued private ownership, lease, or new construction?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (6)
    • buy-versus-lease analysis
    • lifecycle cost model
    • net-present-value analysis
    • independent government estimate
    • decision memorandum
    • sensitivity cases

    Effect on publication · No claim that purchase was more or less economical.

  • How did ICE change management prices when the government assumed property ownership costs?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (8)
    • last pre-sale price schedule
    • first post-sale price schedule
    • ownership-change modifications
    • fixed monthly amount
    • per diem
    • maintenance allocation
    • insurance and utility allocation
    • capital expenditure allocation

    Effect on publication · No paid-twice or duplicate-cost conclusion.

  • What property and deliverables were assigned to SK2 under contract 70CMSW26C00000002?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (7)
    • statement of work
    • justification and approval
    • modifications
    • invoices
    • property assignments
    • appraiser and consultant subcontracts
    • conflict disclosures

    Effect on publication · SK2 remains a documented relationship lead, not a facility-specific fee allocation.

  • What is contained in the schedules and similar attachments omitted from the SEC-filed agreements?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (6)
    • Schedule 5.1
    • Schedule D
    • title and survey schedules
    • personal-property lists
    • disclosure schedules
    • closing exhibits

    Effect on publication · The public packet cannot claim complete property or diligence scope.

  • What deferred maintenance, environmental issues, capital needs, and condition findings did DHS accept?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (7)
    • structural reports
    • maintenance reports
    • environmental assessments
    • capital budgets
    • inspection reports
    • condition credits
    • closing adjustments

    Effect on publication · No claim that DHS inherited hidden defects or paid a condition premium.

  • What purchase agreements and diligence terms governed Prairie and Midwest?

    NOT OBTAINED

    Records that would resolve this (6)
    • executed purchase agreements
    • access agreements
    • appraisals
    • closing statements
    • property-condition documents
    • ownership-change contract modifications

    Effect on publication · July agreement terms cannot be projected onto the August sales.

15

Open questions

Thirty questions the reviewed records leave open, each with the evidence that would answer it and who holds it. An open question is not an allegation.

  1. 01

    What appraised fair-market value did DHS approve for each property?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • government appraisal
    • approved appraisal
    • effective valuation date
    • valuation approach and assumptions

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  2. 02

    Who reviewed each appraisal and what changes or conditions did the reviewer require?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • review appraisal
    • reviewer identity
    • approval sheet
    • review comments

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  3. 03

    Which independent appraiser or appraisal firm performed each assignment?

    intermediaries · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • engagement letter
    • appraiser identity
    • license and qualifications
    • invoice

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  4. 04

    What just-compensation amount did DHS establish before negotiations?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (3)
    • just-compensation determination
    • approval chain
    • date established

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  5. 05

    What offers, counteroffers, and negotiation analyses led to each exact price?

    negotiation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • negotiation memorandum
    • offers and counteroffers
    • meeting notes
    • price recommendation

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  6. 06

    What buy-versus-lease or alternative-site analysis supported ownership?

    alternatives · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • buy-versus-lease analysis
    • alternative-site analysis
    • lease continuation scenario
    • decision memorandum

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  7. 07

    What lifecycle and capital-needs model supported the purchases?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • discounted lifecycle-cost model
    • capital-needs assessment
    • maintenance forecast
    • replacement-cost analysis

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  8. 08

    What replacement-cost, depreciation, land-value, and comparable-sale inputs were used?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • cost approach
    • depreciation schedule
    • land appraisal
    • comparable transactions

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  9. 09

    Were all four properties formally assigned under SK2 contract 70CMSW26C00000002?

    allocation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (3)
    • property assignment list
    • task instructions
    • invoice-to-property crosswalk

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  10. 10

    What property-specific deliverables did SK2 or its team submit?

    deliverables · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • accepted deliverables
    • site reports
    • invoice support
    • quality review

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  11. 11

    What do the four underlying SK2 access and confidentiality agreements require?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • four executed access agreements
    • amendments
    • termination notices
    • inspection protocol

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  12. 12

    Who actually entered and inspected each property?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • site-visit logs
    • inspection-party roster
    • visitor records
    • travel records

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  13. 13

    What environmental assessments were obtained and who authored them?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • Phase I/II reports
    • regulatory correspondence
    • engagements
    • invoices

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  14. 14

    What structural and condition reports were reviewed?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • structural report
    • property-condition assessment
    • maintenance report
    • repair estimate

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  15. 15

    What title objections, cures, and encumbrance releases appeared in the closing files?

    title · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (5)
    • title commitments
    • title notices
    • seller responses
    • lien releases
    • final title policies

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  16. 16

    What surveys and legal-description work were obtained?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • ALTA surveys
    • buyer surveys
    • survey objections
    • invoices

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  17. 17

    What adjustments, credits, commissions, and costs appeared at closing?

    money · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • joint settlement statements
    • wire confirmations
    • proration schedules
    • closing invoices

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  18. 18

    How much was CBRE paid for each sale and under what formula?

    intermediaries · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • broker agreement
    • commission schedule
    • invoice
    • payment record

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  19. 19

    What did CBRE do beyond the seller-broker role printed in the agreements?

    intermediaries · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • engagement scope
    • marketing records
    • broker communications
    • conflict disclosure

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  20. 20

    What fees and title products did Chicago Title provide?

    intermediaries · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • escrow agreement
    • title commitment
    • title policy
    • fee invoice

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  21. 21

    Which DHS officials and offices approved appraisal, price, funding, and acquisition?

    approval · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • approval chain
    • delegations
    • acquisition decision memorandum
    • funding certification

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  22. 22

    Which appropriation and Treasury account funded each purchase?

    money · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (3)
    • funding document
    • Treasury account symbol
    • obligation and disbursement records

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  23. 23

    How were CoreCivic management prices changed after the United States assumed ownership costs?

    management-pricing · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • pre-sale rate schedule
    • post-sale rate schedule
    • ownership-change modification
    • invoice comparison

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  24. 24

    What obligations remain with CoreCivic versus DHS after closing?

    management-pricing · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • management contracts
    • facilities responsibility matrix
    • maintenance responsibilities
    • insurance terms

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  25. 25

    What verified local tax and service-revenue effects followed federal ownership?

    local-impact · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • official assessor record
    • tax-bill history
    • school and county impact analysis
    • service agreements

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  26. 26

    What property-level accounting basis produced Prairie’s June 30 carrying value?

    accounting · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • fixed-asset ledger
    • capital additions
    • depreciation schedule
    • impairments

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  27. 27

    What defensible non-appraisal comparator exists for Midwest?

    valuation · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • property tax records
    • company carrying value
    • historic acquisition basis
    • capital improvements

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  28. 28

    Which seller-document categories were actually delivered, and were any unavailable?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • document index
    • production log
    • exceptions
    • supplemental deliveries

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  29. 29

    What independent verification, if any, tested the seller’s environmental and property representations?

    diligence · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (4)
    • verification memorandum
    • third-party reports
    • exceptions list
    • closing certificate

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

  30. 30

    Which federal appraisal and acquisition standards did DHS determine applied?

    legal-framework · open

    The answer would distinguish documented process from inference and could materially change the valuation or intermediary account.

    Records that would answer it (3)
    • legal memorandum
    • standard selection
    • waiver or exception analysis

    Who holds them · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, ICE Office of Acquisition Management, CoreCivic, SK2 LLC, relevant intermediary

    What this does not establish

    An open question is not an allegation, a finding that a record was improperly withheld, or evidence that the transaction was fair or unfair.

14

Records-request docket

Where the missing records live and who can release them. A request is not a finding about what the records would show.

  1. 01

    Government appraisals and review appraisals for all four purchases

    Target · DHS, ICE Office of Asset and Facilities Management, and the responsible real-estate contracting office

    Records sought (8)
    • appraisal reports
    • review appraisals
    • appraiser engagement letters
    • valuation dates
    • workfiles
    • approval sheets
    • invoices
    • qualifications and conflict certifications

    This request does not assume the appraisals were absent, deficient, manipulated, or inconsistent with price.

  2. 02

    Price approval and negotiation record

    Target · DHS and ICE acquisition/real-estate offices

    Records sought (7)
    • just-compensation determinations
    • independent government estimates
    • pre-negotiation analyses
    • offers and counteroffers
    • negotiation memoranda
    • approval chains
    • funding certifications

    A request for negotiation records is not a finding of overpayment, favoritism, or improper negotiation.

  3. 03

    Buy-versus-lease, alternatives, and lifecycle-cost analysis

    Target · DHS and ICE

    Records sought (7)
    • buy-versus-lease studies
    • alternative sites
    • continued private-ownership scenario
    • lifecycle-cost models
    • capital-needs assessments
    • replacement-cost estimates
    • decision memoranda

    The request does not assume ownership was less economical than leasing or continued private ownership.

  4. 04

    Four access agreements and property diligence files

    Target · DHS, ICE, CoreCivic, and SK2 LLC

    Records sought (10)
    • four executed access agreements
    • amendments
    • site-visit logs
    • inspection-party rosters
    • surveys
    • environmental assessments
    • structural and condition reports
    • maintenance reports
    • document-production indexes
    • accepted deliverables

    The request does not assume SK2 authored every diligence product or that all contemplated diligence occurred.

  5. 05

    Title, escrow, and closing records

    Target · DHS, CoreCivic, and Chicago Title Insurance Company

    Records sought (10)
    • title commitments
    • title objections
    • seller responses
    • lien releases
    • final title policies
    • escrow instructions
    • joint settlement statements
    • proration schedules
    • wire confirmations
    • closing invoices

    The request does not assume title defects existed or that closing adjustments changed the headline price materially.

  6. 06

    Seller-broker scope and compensation

    Target · CoreCivic and CBRE

    Records sought (7)
    • broker engagement agreements
    • scope of services
    • commission formula
    • invoices
    • payment records
    • property marketing material
    • conflict and dual-agency disclosures

    The request does not assume the commission was excessive, price-linked improperly, or paid by the buyer.

  7. 07

    Property assignments and fee allocation under contract 70CMSW26C00000002

    Target · ICE and SK2 LLC

    Records sought (8)
    • property assignment list
    • task instructions
    • CLIN schedule
    • property-level invoices
    • deliverable acceptance
    • subcontracts
    • consultant agreements
    • organizational-conflict analysis

    The four access relationships do not prove formal contract assignment or any property-specific SK2 fee.

  8. 08

    Pre-sale and post-sale management pricing

    Target · ICE and CoreCivic

    Records sought (7)
    • pre-sale rate schedules
    • post-sale rate schedules
    • ownership-change modifications
    • fixed monthly rates
    • per-diem rates
    • cost-responsibility matrix
    • invoices before and after closing

    The request does not assume ICE continued paying property-cost components after acquiring the properties.

  9. 09

    Local tax and service impacts of federal ownership

    Target · Relevant county assessors, school districts, cities, DHS, and CoreCivic

    Records sought (6)
    • final tax bills
    • assessment history
    • abatement records
    • official fiscal-impact estimates
    • service agreements
    • payment-in-lieu-of-tax discussions if any

    Local assessed values and reported tax estimates are not appraisals and do not by themselves measure total public loss or gain.

The earlier docket entries
  1. 01

    Appraisal, valuation, and acquisition approval records

    Target · DHS / ICE Facilities Management Division

    Records sought (7)
    • final and draft appraisals for all four facilities
    • review appraisals and appraisal-acceptance memoranda
    • appraisal engagement letters and appraiser conflict disclosures
    • independent government estimates and price-negotiation memoranda
    • buy-versus-lease and lifecycle-cost analyses
    • acquisition approval and appropriations certifications
    • comparable-sales, replacement-cost, income and discounted-cash-flow models

    A records request identifies missing evidence. It is not a finding that the records support any particular conclusion.

  2. 02

    Due diligence and property-condition records

    Target · DHS / ICE Facilities Management Division

    Records sought (10)
    • SK2 access agreements
    • data-room index
    • Schedule 5.1 and Schedule D
    • structural and maintenance reports
    • environmental assessments
    • capital-expenditure budgets
    • surveys and title objections
    • inspection findings
    • termination analyses
    • closing adjustments and settlement statements

    A records request identifies missing evidence. It is not a finding that the records support any particular conclusion.

  3. 03

    Pre-sale and post-sale management pricing

    Target · ICE Acquisition Management / contracting offices

    Records sought (6)
    • last pre-sale management contract and price schedule per facility
    • first post-sale modification and price schedule per facility
    • fixed monthly and per-diem rates
    • ownership, insurance, tax, maintenance, utility and capital-cost allocations
    • cost or pricing data, negotiation memoranda, invoices and payment records
    • automatic ownership-change provisions and guidance estimates

    A records request identifies missing evidence. It is not a finding that the records support any particular conclusion.

  4. 04

    SK2 contract 70CMSW26C00000002

    Target · ICE / DHS Office of Acquisition Management

    Records sought (8)
    • complete contract and statement of work
    • sole-source justification and approval
    • all modifications
    • property assignments
    • deliverable and appraisal lists
    • invoices and payments
    • consultant and appraiser subcontracts
    • organizational-conflict and procurement-integrity records

    A records request identifies missing evidence. It is not a finding that the records support any particular conclusion.

  5. 05

    Prairie and Midwest sale agreements

    Target · DHS / ICE and CoreCivic public filings

    Records sought (6)
    • executed purchase agreements
    • access/confidentiality agreements
    • appraisals and review appraisals
    • condition reports
    • closing statements
    • ownership-change management modifications

    A records request identifies missing evidence. It is not a finding that the records support any particular conclusion.

16

Sources

Every source used on this page, with its class, role and stated limits.

  1. California City Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.1

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact California City price, square feet, seller, buyer, access period, diligence rights, seller documents, title, broker, notices, and signatories.

    Locator · Agreement §§ 1–7, 12, 14; signature page

    Limit · A party-filed agreement. It does not provide the appraisal, review appraisal, access agreement, broker commission agreement, or complete closing file.

  2. Otay Mesa Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.2

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact Otay Mesa price, square feet, seller, buyer, access period, diligence rights, seller documents, title, broker, notices, and signatories.

    Locator · Agreement §§ 1–7, 12, 14; signature page

    Limit · A party-filed agreement. It does not provide the appraisal, review appraisal, access agreement, broker commission agreement, or complete closing file.

  3. Midwest Regional Reception Center Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.1

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact Midwest price, square feet, seller, buyer, SK2 access period, diligence rights, seller documents, title, CBRE broker role, notices, and signatories.

    Locator · Agreement §§ 1–7, 12, 14; signature page

    Limit · A party-filed agreement. It excludes seller appraisals and does not provide the government appraisal, access agreement, broker commission agreement, or complete closing file.

  4. Prairie Correctional Facility Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.2

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact Prairie price, square feet, seller, buyer, SK2 access period, diligence rights, seller documents, title, CBRE broker role, notices, and signatories.

    Locator · Agreement §§ 1–7, 12, 14; signature page

    Limit · A party-filed agreement. It excludes seller appraisals and does not provide the government appraisal, access agreement, broker commission agreement, or complete closing file.

  5. Form 8-K reporting California City and Otay Mesa sales

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Transaction completion, facility capacity, rounded company announcement amounts, and exhibit crosswalk.

    Locator · Items 1.01, 2.01, and 9.01

    Limit · The 8-K summary rounds prices; the filed agreements provide exact dollars.

  6. Form 8-K reporting Prairie and Midwest sales

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Transaction completion, facility capacity, rounded company announcement amounts, and exhibit crosswalk.

    Locator · Items 1.01, 2.01, and 9.01

    Limit · The 8-K summary rounds prices; the filed agreements provide exact dollars.

  7. CoreCivic Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2026

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party-filed · published 2026-08-06 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Prairie June 30 net carrying value, rounded sales summaries, debt repayment, expected gains/net proceeds, and continuing-management disclosure.

    Locator · Idled-facility net carrying value table; Subsequent Events

    Limit · Net carrying value is an accounting measure, not an appraisal or fair-market-value estimate.

  8. CoreCivic Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results

    CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Company statements about continuing management, possible contract modification, contract horizons, expected gain/net proceeds, and debt/repurchase chronology.

    Locator · Facility Sales & Continuing Management; Capital Strategy

    Limit · Company statements are attributed. They do not establish current post-sale rate schedules or trace specific sale dollars into later corporate actions.

  9. CoreCivic Announces New Contract Award at Prairie Correctional Facility

    CoreCivic, Inc. · primary-party · published 2026-08-04 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Prairie management-contract start, five-year term, fixed monthly plus incremental per-diem structure, and company revenue forecast.

    Locator · Contract term and payment-structure paragraph

    Limit · The source does not disclose the rate schedule, invoices, or post-sale ownership-change modification.

  10. Why the federal government bought two California detention centers

    CalMatters · secondary-investigative-reporting · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Attributed CoreCivic statement about independent federal appraisals, and county assessed-value comparators for the two California properties.

    Locator · Appraisal-process and assessed-value discussion

    Limit · The appraisal statement is company attribution; the appraisals themselves were not published. Assessed value is not fair market value.

  11. Otay Mesa detention-center sale and local property-tax implications

    NBC 7 San Diego · secondary-reporting · published 2026-07 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Attributed estimate of annual local property-tax and school-revenue effects after federal ownership.

    Locator · Reported county tax-loss estimate

    Limit · Secondary estimate; not a closing statement, official tax settlement, or complete local fiscal-impact analysis.

  12. 42 U.S.C. § 4651 — Uniform policy on real property acquisition practices

    U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Law Revision Counsel · primary-authoritative · retrieved 2026-08-28

    General federal policy framework stating that real property ordinarily is appraised before negotiations and that an agency establishes just compensation not below its approved appraisal.

    Locator · Paragraphs (2) and (3)

    Limit · General statutory framework only. This packet does not reach a legal conclusion about exact applicability, waiver, compliance, or the contents of DHS files.

  13. Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (Yellow Book)

    U.S. Department of Justice · primary-authoritative-guidance · retrieved 2026-08-28

    General federal appraisal standards and review context.

    Locator · DOJ Land Acquisition Section overview

    Limit · The standards do not establish which standard DHS applied to these four transactions or whether any specific appraisal complied.

  14. Real Property Asset Acquisition business process

    U.S. General Services Administration · primary-authoritative-guidance · retrieved 2026-08-28

    General process context for proposal evaluation, appraisals, just-compensation estimates, pre-negotiation analysis, negotiation, approval, and payment scheduling.

    Locator · RPM.030.010 Real Property Asset Acquisition

    Limit · A government-wide process description does not establish that every listed artifact exists in the DHS file or that a particular action was compliant.

  15. Buy the walls, pay the operator

    Detention Receipts · internal-branch · published 2026-08-21 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Current public implementation to correct and deepen, not an independent factual source.

    Locator · Current Wave 12 route; https://detentionreceipts.org/follow-the-money/public-acquisition-audit

    Limit · Internal publication; it must be reconciled against primary filed agreements.

  16. SK2 contractor case file

    Detention Receipts · internal-branch · published 2026-08-28 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Current two-property access model to extend to four filed access relationships.

    Locator · Current SK2 case file; https://detentionreceipts.org/contractors/sk2

    Limit · Internal publication; no property assignment may be inferred from access.

  1. Wave 7 — The Detention Capacity Market

    Detention Receipts · reviewed-local-packet · published 2026-08-21 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Existing four-sale identity, bed, ownership and management baseline.

    Local packet · research/capacity-market/7-2026-08-21

    Limit · Wave 12 supersedes the rounded July prices with exact agreement values and deepens, rather than replaces, Wave 7.

  2. California City Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.1

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic · primary-sec-filed-agreement · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Exact price, square footage, property scope, expense allocation, due diligence, SK2 access agreement, representations and as-is terms.

    Locator · Sections 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14; Schedule references.

    Limit · Certain schedules, contact details and information were omitted or redacted.

  3. Otay Mesa Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.2

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic · primary-sec-filed-agreement · published 2026-07-06 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Exact price, square footage, property scope, expense allocation, due diligence, SK2 access agreement, broker and as-is terms.

    Locator · Sections 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14; Schedule references.

    Limit · Certain schedules, contact details and information were omitted or redacted.

  4. Prairie Correctional Facility Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.2

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic · primary-sec-filed-agreement · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact price, building area, property scope, expense allocation, due-diligence chronology, SK2 access agreement, CBRE broker clause, Chicago Title escrow role and signatories.

    Locator · Sections 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14; Schedule references.

    Limit · Certain schedules, contact details and information were omitted or redacted.

  5. Midwest Regional Reception Center Purchase and Sale Agreement, Exhibit 10.1

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic · primary-sec-filed-agreement · published 2026-08-05 · retrieved 2026-08-28

    Exact price, building area, property scope, expense allocation, due-diligence chronology, SK2 access agreement, CBRE broker clause, Chicago Title escrow role and signatories.

    Locator · Sections 2, 4, 5, 9 and 14; Schedule references.

    Limit · Certain schedules, contact details and information were omitted or redacted.

  6. CoreCivic Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2026

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / CoreCivic · primary-sec-filing · published 2026-05-07 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Prairie carrying value, California City and Midwest pre-sale contract, revenue, population and payment-structure context.

    Locator · Idle Facilities table; Safety-segment facility discussions.

    Limit · Carrying value is not fair market value and excludes specified transferable assets.

  7. What the sale of 2 ICE detention centers reveals about Trump’s new immigration strategy

    CalMatters · credible-secondary-reporting · published 2026-07-22 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    County assessed-value comparators, company appraisal-process statement, and policy context.

    Limit · Assessed values are not appraisals; the appraisal-process claim is attributed to CoreCivic.

  8. Otay Mesa Detention Center valued at quarter of federal purchase price, records show

    NBC 7 San Diego · credible-secondary-reporting · published 2026-07-09 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    San Diego County assessor estimate of annual local property-tax and school-revenue loss.

    Limit · Attributed estimate; assessed value is not fair market value.

  9. Official award search snapshot for SK2 LLC prime awards

    USAspending.gov · primary-government-api-snapshot · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Stored official snapshot confirming award ID, recipient, UEI, current award amount, period of performance, awarding agency and contract type.

    Locator · api.usaspending.gov /api/v2/search/spending_by_award/ · sha256 3932370a71d6…

    Limit · The search endpoint returns no statement of work, modification history, competition record or property assignment.

  10. Acquisition of Real Property Services for ICE Operating Requirements, 70CMSW26C00000002

    HigherGov · secondary-official-data-mirror · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Discovery source for initial value, scope description, competition, place of performance and CAGE.

    Limit · Mirror fields stay review-pending until an official record carries them.

  11. Definitive Contract 70CMSW26C00000002

    GovTribe · secondary-official-data-mirror · published 2026-01-07 · retrieved 2026-08-21

    Independent discovery mirror for initial award, one-offer sole-source and place-of-performance context.

    Limit · Generated summary and mirror data are not the contract or statement of work.