What public records establish about Acquisition Logistics LLC: the original Army-selected prime contractor hired to construct, operate, and maintain Camp East Montana; the later administrative transfer to ICE; a $598.4 million frozen obligation record; serious GAO findings about acquisition, waste, detention standards, and contractor oversight; termination for the government's convenience; transition to a different prime vendor; and the ownership, subcontract, closeout, and actor-specific evidence that remains unresolved.
What these records do not establish The award record does not establish a corporate parent above Acquisition Logistics LLC, why ICE terminated the order, or that the later Amentum contract succeeded to it. Who operated Camp East Montana is established by sources outside the award record, cited on the corporate case file. The record documents an administrative transfer between agencies. The parent recipient above Acquisition Logistics LLC is not reported in the record.
01
Who this company is on the record
Identity, registered identifiers and address, as published in the cited records.
Legal name
Acquisition Logistics LLC
Display name
Acquisition Logistics
Legal form and jurisdiction
Limited liability company · Virginia
Lifecycle status
active
Registry identifier
S2511543
Virginia State Corporation Commission record, via secondary registry mirror. The secondary mirror is not a complete governance or ownership record.
CAGE code
50E79
Legacy DLA/SAM public extract compiled by CAGE.report. The secondary legacy record does not establish the current SAM registration state or replace an official DLA/SAM record.
DUNS
809210516
Historical DUNS in legacy SAM/CAGE-linked public extract. A historical DUNS is not the current UEI and does not establish current registration status.
Also filed as
Acquisition Logistics Company
Spellings and brands carried for the same legal entity in the cited records. A different spelling is not a different company, and a brand is not a subsidiary.
Principal executive office
Henrico, Virginia
Corporate office as published in the cited filings. Not a detention facility.
Completeness
Partial dossier
Reviewed scope covers exact identity, formation and public identifiers, one current executive, the original Army award, ICE transfer and two transfer-record actions, four contract-history events, original and current operator periods, one procurement case, GAO oversight, eighteen open questions, thirty-two withheld inferences, and two append-only corrections. It is not a complete ownership, governance, subcontract, payment, political, litigation, worker-safety, termination-settlement, or incident-attribution census. Reviewed August 24, 2026.
Names, titles and dates exactly as the cited records publish them. A title establishes no participation in a contract, a subsidiary's work, or a government decision.
Executive roles at the review date (2)
Titles as published. A role establishes no participation in a contract, lobbying contact, contribution, or government decision.
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Ken Wagner
President and Chief Executive Officer
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
03
Selected corporate events
Each amount keeps its own meaning and its own line. A sale price, an accounting gain, a repayment and a repurchase are different objects and are never added together.
Army awards Camp East Montana task order through WEXMAC
corporate history · source-reported · Event July 18, 2025 · Announced July 18, 2025
Recorded for Acquisition Logistics LLC
On July 18, 2025, the Army awarded W9124J-25-F-A075 to Acquisition Logistics to establish and operate a 5,000-capacity short-term ICE detention facility. The award announcement reported 13 bids.
Fiscal 2025 Army funds obligated at initial award
$231,878,229.00 USD
Source-reported
Initial obligation at Army award, not total contract value or cash paid.
Corrected total cumulative face value in DoD contract announcement
$1,238,567,966.00 USD
Source-reported
Corrected cumulative face value of the original Army task order; not an obligation, outlay, or amount to add to the transferred award.
Does not establish that the full face value was obligated or paid, that the later ICE record is additional money, or that WEXMAC use was appropriate for detention.
Camp East Montana contract administration moves from Army to ICE
corporate history · observed · Event October 1, 2025 · Announced November 14, 2025
Recorded for Acquisition Logistics LLC
An Army modification dated September 23 transferred contract-administration responsibility to ICE effective October 1, 2025. The ICE USAspending record for the administrative transfer was signed November 14, 2025.
Does not establish a corporate novation, assignment to a new contractor, movement of cash between agencies, or that the November action created new additive contract value.
ICE terminates the transferred Camp East Montana order for convenience
corporate history · terminated · Event April 17, 2026 · Announced April 17, 2026
Recorded for Acquisition Logistics LLC
Modification P00001 terminated the ICE transfer award in full for the government's convenience on April 17, 2026, with zero transaction obligation.
Termination for convenience is not termination for cause, default, fraud, or a finding of contractor fault. The reviewed record does not establish why ICE chose this remedy.
Camp East Montana operations transition to a different prime vendor
corporate history · observed · Event April 18, 2026 · Announced March 12, 2026
Recorded for Acquisition Logistics LLC · org-amentum
GAO reports that ICE awarded a noncompetitive, undefinitized contract to a different vendor on March 12, 2026 to begin operating Camp East Montana on April 18. Separate federal award records and reporting identify that vendor as Amentum Services, Inc.
Does not establish a novation, assignment of Acquisition Logistics' contract rights, corporate succession, contractor fault as the reason for termination, or that GAO's findings caused the transition.
Represented in this dataset. Not company revenue, not total federal business, not market share.
Award records held
1
Current award value
$598,444,871.04
Base and exercised options on 1 of 1 awards. Not cash paid.
Obligated
$598,444,871.04
Legally committed on 1 of 1 awards.
Outlayed
$314,891,675.50
Cash disbursed across all 1 awards.
Potential value
$1,339,875,022.97
Ceiling if every option is exercised. It may never be reached.
Facilities named in these awards
1
Only where the award description names the facility and a reviewer matched it.
Awards naming an unmatched facility
0
The record names a facility; no confirmed directory row exists in this extract.
Awards identifying no facility
0
Counted here rather than assigned to a site on a guess.
Earliest to latest period
Oct 01, 2025 → Apr 17, 2026
Across the awards held here, not the recipient's full contracting history.
Entity resolution: The record documents an administrative transfer between agencies. The parent recipient above Acquisition Logistics LLC is not reported in the record.
05
When these awards run
One row per award, spanning only the period the source reports. Bar length encodes time, never money.
Current period of performance
Potential period if options are exercised
A dated contract action
Source: USAspending.gov, retrieved 2026-08-20. Bar length encodes time only. It carries no information about amount.
Award periods as a table (1)
Reported period of performance and current value for each award
ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSFER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WAR TASK ORDER W9124J25FA075 TO THE US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT FOR DETENTION, TRANSPORTATION AND MEDICAL SERVICES AT CAMP EAST MONTANA TEMPORARY DETENTION CENTER IN EL PASO, TX
Obligated $598,444,871.04 · Outlayed $314,891,675.50 · 2 contract actions · Period to April 17, 2026
Facility: Facility named and matched to a directory row — Camp East Montana Temporary Detention Center — The transfer description names the Camp East Montana temporary detention center in El Paso. Naming a facility in an award does not establish who operates it, who owns it, or how many people are held there.
Each contract action beside the source registry entry it was read from, the retrieval provenance of that snapshot, and the recorded corporate relationships whose own period contains the action date.
Recorded relationships in effect on this action date
No recorded relationship has a period containing this action date.
The crosswalk states where each action was read from and which recorded relationships were in effect on its date. A relationship in effect on an action date did not thereby sign, price, perform, receive, or benefit from that action, and no money on an action is assigned to a related entity, a person, a facility, or a service location.
09
Every contract action on this award
One row per action the award record reports, in date order, with the obligation each action moved and the running total. Select a modification number to read the exact source fields behind that row.
70CDCR26FR0000001 · 2 contract actions
Cumulative reported obligation
Potential value (all options) — $1,339,875,022.97
Current value (exercised options) — $598,444,871.04
Cash outlayed to date, as of 2026-08-20 — $314,891,675.50
Source: USAspending.gov award 70CDCR26FR0000001, retrieved 2026-08-20. Unit: US dollars, nominal, not inflation-adjusted.
The line steps only on dates the source records. Cash outlay is reported as a single to-date total with no action-level dates, so it is drawn as one marker at the retrieval date and never as a line across time. Each action mark is keyboard focusable.
Contract actions as a table (2) — select a modification for its evidence trace
Every contract action reported for award 70CDCR26FR0000001
Action date
Mod
Action
This action
Cumulative obligation
Nov 14, 2025
DELIVERY ORDER
$598,444,871.04
$598,444,871.04
Apr 17, 2026
TERMINATE FOR CONVENIENCE (COMPLETE OR PARTIAL)
$0.00
$598,444,871.04
10
Legal and oversight record
Procedural posture as the cited records state it. A vote, a filing account or an inquiry is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Gemini challenge to the CICA stay override for Camp East Montana award
United States Court of Federal Claims · 25-1337C · Filed August 11, 2025 · Closed September 8, 2025 · Status as of September 18, 2025
United States Court of Federal Claims · court holding · Background fact in published opinion
The court's background states that the Army awarded Acquisition Logistics a task order to construct, operate, and maintain the new 5,000-capacity facility.
The background statement does not adjudicate every performance issue, subcontractor role, or later termination decision.
United States Court of Federal Claims · court holding · Motion denied
The court denied the preliminary-injunction request concerning the CICA stay override.
The ruling is not a broad validation of contractor performance, later facility conditions, or the merits of every allegation in the underlying GAO protest.
The case concerned the government's stay override and does not establish later contract performance, termination cause, or contractor innocence or liability on unrelated matters.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · June 9, 2026 · GAO-26-108886
GAO anonymizes the prime contractor in its public report. The subject attribution to Acquisition Logistics is a cross-source identity inference based on the exact facility, award period, court record, DoD award, and ICE transfer record.
Expedited acquisition produced planning and source-selection problems
GAO found the Army and ICE used WEXMAC for detention for the first time, selected a contractor without prior detention-services experience, incorporated a contractor-written performance work statement that lacked normal specificity, and used a lowest-price-technically-acceptable process despite complex and poorly defined requirements.
The finding does not establish that the contractor had no federal logistics experience or that every problem was caused solely by the contractor rather than agency decisions.
Fixed pricing caused millions in payments for unused meals and services
GAO estimated up to $11.5 million was spent on services before any detained people arrived, about $423,000 on unneeded meals through September 2025, and about $7.1 million on unneeded meals from October 1, 2025 through March 12, 2026.
The estimates do not equal contractor profit, fraud, recoverable damages, or the difference between the branch award's obligation and outlay.
Camp East Montana opened without required inspection or key detention standards
GAO found ICE did not conduct the required pre-occupancy inspection. Initial gaps included perimeter-camera blind spots, inadequate accessibility, insufficient outdoor recreation, and missing attorney and family visitation space.
The finding does not assign sole responsibility for every gap to the prime contractor or establish the current condition of each item.
ICE documented serious medical screening and treatment gaps
GAO reported inadequate tuberculosis screening, missing comprehensive health assessments, and absent treatment plans for detained people with chronic conditions, including diabetes and HIV.
The report does not identify which corporate or subcontractor personnel performed each act, and the finding is not a medical-causation determination for any individual death.
ICE documented weapons, transport, reporting, and evidence-preservation problems
GAO reported a lost loaded firearm, transportation delays, failures to provide required use-of-force and death reports, and missing or destroyed evidence associated with an incident later ruled a homicide.
The report does not establish who personally lost, removed, or destroyed evidence, criminal intent, or that Acquisition Logistics caused a death.
The missing Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan limited enforcement
GAO found the Army omitted a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan because of the rushed schedule. ICE officials said this limited their ability to monitor performance and apply financial penalties when deficiencies were identified.
The missing plan does not excuse contractor obligations or establish that a specific penalty would otherwise have been imposed.
ICE terminated the initial contract for convenience and chose a different operator
GAO reports that ICE awarded a noncompetitive, undefinitized contract to a different vendor on March 12, 2026 to begin operating April 18, and terminated the initial contract for convenience in mid-April.
GAO does not state that its findings caused the termination, that termination was for cause or default, or that the different vendor legally succeeded to the prior contract.
The report does not establish that every facility problem was solely caused by Acquisition Logistics, that the contract was terminated for cause, or that GAO's audit caused the transition.
Questions the reviewed records do not answer, with the evidence that is missing and where we are looking for it.
What this does not establish
An open question records missing evidence. It is not a finding.
ownership control
Who currently owns and controls Acquisition Logistics LLC?
Why it matters
The award self-reports the company as its own parent; that is not a beneficial-ownership census.
Missing evidence
Members and ownership percentages; Voting and control rights; Any parent or holding company
Where we are looking
Virginia SCC records; SAM responsibility records; company governance documents
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Who currently owns and controls Acquisition Logistics LLC? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
governance
Who are the complete current officers, managers, and governing persons?
Why it matters
Ken Wagner's president/CEO role is current-at-source, but the complete current roster is not established.
Missing evidence
Manager and officer roster; Role effective dates; Board or governing-body records
Where we are looking
Virginia SCC; company governance records; SAM.gov
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Who are the complete current officers, managers, and governing persons? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
identity location
What is the company's current public website and business office?
Why it matters
A historical federal record lists a website that was not retrievable; the registered street address may be residential.
Missing evidence
Current official website; Public business office; Address effective dates
Where we are looking
Company filing; SAM.gov; Virginia SCC; company-controlled domain records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What is the company's current public website and business office? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
award lineage
What do the complete original W9124J25FA075 task order, modifications, invoices, and payment records establish?
Why it matters
The public DoD announcement, court opinion, GAO report, and ICE transfer record expose different snapshots and accounting fields.
Missing evidence
Original task order; All modifications; Invoices; Payments; Option exercise; Termination settlement
Where we are looking
Army contract file; FPDS; USAspending; ICE transfer file
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What do the complete original W9124J25FA075 task order, modifications, invoices, and payment records establish? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
contract administration
What exact legal and accounting mechanism moved contract administration from Army to ICE?
Why it matters
GAO says an Army modification transferred administration effective October 1; the ICE award action is dated November 14.
Missing evidence
September 23 modification; Interagency agreement; Funding and payment instructions; Administrative-transfer memorandum
Where we are looking
Army and ICE contract files; interagency agreement; FPDS history
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What exact legal and accounting mechanism moved contract administration from Army to ICE? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
procurement
Why do the original DoD announcement and the ICE transfer record report different offer counts?
Why it matters
DoD reported 13 bids, while the transferred ICE record reports 11 offers and competition code D.
Missing evidence
Solicitation and evaluation record; Offeror count by phase; FPDS competition coding lineage
Where we are looking
Army source-selection file; WEXMAC task-order competition record; FPDS
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Why do the original DoD announcement and the ICE transfer record report different offer counts? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
subcontracting
Which entities performed medical, guard, construction, food, transportation, and other services under the initial contract?
Why it matters
GAO says the proposal identified medical and guard subcontractors but does not name them publicly.
Missing evidence
Subcontract plan; Named subcontractors; Amounts; Effective dates; Statements of work
Where we are looking
Army contract file; official subaward records; invoices; contractor proposal
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Which entities performed medical, guard, construction, food, transportation, and other services under the initial contract? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
What exact role did Amentum perform before becoming the new prime operator?
Why it matters
AP and NPR report that Amentum was already a subcontractor, but the exact scope and dates are unresolved.
Missing evidence
Subcontract; Task allocation; Invoices; Personnel and facility role records
Where we are looking
Army contract file; Amentum records; official subaward data
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What exact role did Amentum perform before becoming the new prime operator? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
performance oversight
What do the complete performance work statement, discrepancy reports, oversight report, and corrective-action records show?
Why it matters
GAO summarizes selected gaps, but the underlying records are needed for complete chronology, responses, and resolution status.
ICE contract file; GAO workpapers where releasable; records requests
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What do the complete performance work statement, discrepancy reports, oversight report, and corrective-action records show? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
Which GAO findings and ICE discrepancy reports were corrected, when, and by whom?
Why it matters
The report notes serious gaps and open recommendations but does not provide a complete remediation ledger.
Missing evidence
Corrective-action closures; Inspection results; Current recommendation status; Financial remedies
Where we are looking
ICE; GAO; Amentum; facility records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Which GAO findings and ICE discrepancy reports were corrected, when, and by whom? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
termination
Why did ICE terminate the contract for convenience, and what termination settlement was reached?
Why it matters
The legal posture is established, but the decision memorandum and settlement economics are not.
Missing evidence
Termination decision; Settlement proposal; Settlement agreement; Closeout and deobligation actions
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Why did ICE terminate the contract for convenience, and what termination settlement was reached? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
accounting freshness
Why did the live USAspending outlay fall below the branch's August 20 snapshot?
Why it matters
The branch snapshot reports $314,891,675.50; the live page on August 24 reported $312,275,691.46, a decrease of $2,615,984.04.
Missing evidence
Raw transaction and payment history; Adjustment or reversal record; Next generated snapshot
Where we are looking
USAspending API; FPDS; ICE payment records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Why did the live USAspending outlay fall below the branch's August 20 snapshot? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
accounting
What happened to obligations not reported as outlayed when the contract ended?
Why it matters
Obligation minus the frozen outlay is not automatically savings, refund, recoverable money, or final settlement.
ICE contract file; USAspending/FPDS updates; payment records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What happened to obligations not reported as outlayed when the contract ended? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
vendor transition
How were operations, staff, subcontracts, assets, and responsibility transitioned to Amentum?
Why it matters
A different vendor began operating April 18, but no novation or assignment is established.
Missing evidence
Transition plan; Asset and data handoff; Subcontract continuity; Personnel transition; Responsibility dates
Where we are looking
ICE contracts; Amentum and Acquisition Logistics records; facility transition documents
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: How were operations, staff, subcontracts, assets, and responsibility transitioned to Amentum? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
corporate compliance
Was Acquisition Logistics properly registered or otherwise authorized to conduct its Camp East Montana work in Texas?
Why it matters
The Virginia entity and federal award are established; Texas corporate-registration status was not resolved from primary records.
Missing evidence
Texas registration or exemption; Effective dates; Registered agent
Where we are looking
Texas Secretary of State; contract responsibility file
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Was Acquisition Logistics properly registered or otherwise authorized to conduct its Camp East Montana work in Texas? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
worker safety
What worker-safety incidents, OSHA records, and employer/subcontractor responsibilities occurred during construction and operation?
Why it matters
Public reporting contains leads, but this packet does not publish unverified employer or incident attribution.
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What worker-safety incidents, OSHA records, and employer/subcontractor responsibilities occurred during construction and operation? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
human impact
What contract-specific evidence links or does not link identified deaths and serious incidents to prime or subcontractor acts?
Why it matters
Facility-level deaths and GAO reporting gaps are established; legal or medical causation and actor attribution require separate evidence.
Missing evidence
Death and use-of-force reports; Medical records; investigation records; contractor/subcontractor assignments
Where we are looking
ICE; medical examiner; law enforcement; court records; records requests
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What contract-specific evidence links or does not link identified deaths and serious incidents to prime or subcontractor acts? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
political finance
What lobbying, political-finance, and government-relations activity is attributable to the exact company or verified leaders?
Why it matters
The reviewed Slice 10 source set does not establish a complete exact-entity political record.
Missing evidence
Federal/state lobbying; Contributions; Retained firms; Government contacts
Where we are looking
LDA; FEC; state systems; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 10 primary-source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What lobbying, political-finance, and government-relations activity is attributable to the exact company or verified leaders? (partial). Supported facts are included; unresolved evidence remains explicit.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden ownership, an undisclosed subcontract, improper influence, or criminal conduct exists.
12
Corrections to this record
Append-only. The timeline gives each correction's exact discovery and publication time and the dates of the sources behind it; the ledger below keeps the previous value visible beside the corrected one.
Discovered August 24, 2026, 20:45 UTC · Published August 24, 2026, 20:45 UTC
Acquisition Logistics was contracted to construct, operate and maintain Camp East Montana through April 17, 2026. The correction does not establish facility ownership, sole delivery of every service, responsibility for every incident, or termination for contractor fault.
Discovered August 24, 2026, 20:45 UTC · Published August 24, 2026, 20:45 UTC
factual correction · headline, deck, plainSummary, thesis, transition language
The correction does not establish why ICE chose termination for convenience, that GAO's findings caused the transition, or that Amentum legally succeeded to the prior contract.
"Reader-facing copy stated that who operated Camp East Montana during the transferred-order period was not established, and published no operator role for the site."
Now recorded
"The DoD award announcement, the Court of Federal Claims opinion and GAO establish that Acquisition Logistics LLC was contracted to construct, operate and maintain Camp East Montana from July 18, 2025 through April 17, 2026. A time-bounded operator role is published alongside the existing recipient roles."
The award record alone did not establish operator status. Sources outside the award record do, and the earlier copy read the award boundary as a finding of absence.
Acquisition Logistics was contracted to construct, operate and maintain Camp East Montana through April 17, 2026. The correction does not establish facility ownership, sole delivery of every service, responsibility for every incident, or termination for contractor fault.
Discovered August 24, 2026 · Published August 24, 2026
"Acquisition Logistics copy said no succession or replacement relationship was established, while Amentum copy said the audited contractor was replaced and the leverage case called the award a replacement award."
Now recorded
"Every surface now states the same reviewed facts: ICE terminated the earlier order for the government's convenience on April 17, 2026, and GAO reports that a different vendor began operating the site on April 18. Separate award records and reporting identify that vendor as Amentum Services, Inc."
Two reader-facing surfaces contradicted each other, and the replacement wording implied a causal and legal relationship the records do not establish.
The correction does not establish why ICE chose termination for convenience, that GAO's findings caused the transition, or that Amentum legally succeeded to the prior contract.
Discovered August 24, 2026 · Published August 24, 2026
Edges are drawn only from records cited on this site: award recipients, parent recipients, awarding agency, and named performance locations. There is no influence score, no lobbying edge without a filing, and no edge inferred from timing or name similarity. A missing edge means no source, not no relationship.
14
Corporate case-file sources
Every source cited by the corporate sections above, once each.
15
Sources
Award figures retrieved from the USAspending.gov API on 2026-08-20. Amounts are nominal US dollars as reported by the awarding agency.