Skip to main content
DetentionReceipts

Follow the money

Influence channels

Company treasury money, employee-funded PAC money, lobbying expense and subsidiary receipts are separate legal and accounting objects. They are published side by side and never added together. No record on this page establishes that political activity caused a government decision.

01

Disclosed political channels

Each figure is reported by one filer, for one period, in one channel. Company-published figures are unaudited company disclosures, not transaction ledgers.

Company treasury money, employee-funded PAC money, 527 money, independent expenditures, lobbying expense and subsidiary receipts are separate accounting and legal objects with different filers, periods and reporting scopes. This page never adds one to another, and none of them is added to federal award money.

Corporate treasury (company funds)

The GEO Group · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$4,216,900

Contributions the company reports making from corporate funds. Not employee money, not a federal PAC ledger, not lobbying expense.

The GEO Group published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

The aggregate does not identify every recipient, refund, amendment or filing lineage, and does not establish that any contribution influenced or caused a government decision.

Connected PAC (employee-funded)

The GEO Group · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$208,500

Contributions the company reports its employee-funded connected PAC made. Not corporate treasury money.

The GEO Group published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

A connected-PAC total is not corporate money and does not establish that any disbursement influenced or caused a government decision.

Direct lobbying expense

The GEO Group · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$5,371,336

Reported lobbying expense under the Lobbying Disclosure Act. An expense, not a contribution to any candidate or committee.

The GEO Group published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

Reported lobbying expense does not establish that a meeting occurred beyond what was reported, that an official was persuaded, or that any award followed.

Corporate treasury (company funds)

CoreCivic · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$1,102,700

Contributions the company reports making from corporate funds. Not employee money, not a federal PAC ledger, not lobbying expense.

CoreCivic published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

The aggregate does not identify every recipient, refund, amendment or filing lineage, and does not establish that any contribution influenced or caused a government decision.

Connected PAC (employee-funded)

CoreCivic · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$130,434.08

Contributions the company reports its employee-funded connected PAC made. Not corporate treasury money.

CoreCivic published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

A connected-PAC total is not corporate money and does not establish that any disbursement influenced or caused a government decision.

Direct lobbying expense

CoreCivic · 2025 · Company disclosure — unaudited

$3,271,346.99

Reported lobbying expense under the Lobbying Disclosure Act. An expense, not a contribution to any candidate or committee.

CoreCivic published this 2025 figure in its own political activity and lobbying report.

What this does not establish

Reported lobbying expense does not establish that a meeting occurred beyond what was reported, that an official was persuaded, or that any award followed.

Subsidiary treasury into a non-contribution account

The GEO Group · 2026 · Primary government filing

$4,413,000

Receipts a recipient committee reported into a non-contribution account from a named subsidiary legal entity. Not a candidate contribution and not a company-reported aggregate.

MAGA Inc. reported five receipts from GEO Reentry Services LLC between 2025-10-09 and 2026-07-31 totalling $4,413,000.

What this does not establish

The filings establish what the recipient committee reported receiving. They do not resolve the donor entity's own federal contract or bid status, its tax classification, or its payment account, and they do not establish that any government decision followed.

For scale only · Separate-channel sum across both company reports: $14,301,217.07. The final sum combines separately reported channels for scale only; it is not a homogeneous influence-spending measure. Corporate funds account for 94.01% of the two companies’ disclosed political contributions.

02

Unreconciled figures inside a company report

Where a company's own report prints two different totals, both are shown as printed.

CoreCivic 2025 report — unreconciled internal difference

Company disclosure — unaudited; shown as printed

Table A-1 summary — CoreCivic PAC contributions
$130,434.08
Table A-2 detail grand total
$129,000.00
Difference
$1,434.08

The company's own 2025 report prints two different PAC totals and does not reconcile the difference.

What this does not establish

The difference does not establish misconduct, misstatement of intent, or any reporting violation. It establishes that a voluntary, unaudited company report needs reconciliation against transaction-level filings.

03

GEO Reentry Services LLC → MAGA Inc.

Five receipts the recipient committee reported, each with its own FEC locator, plus the legal-entity distinctions and the open federal-contractor question.

GEO Reentry Services LLC → MAGA Inc.

5 receipts reported by the recipient committee · as of 2026-08-21

$4,413,000

Subsidiary treasury into a non-contribution account. Not summed with any other channel.

Receipts MAGA Inc. reported from GEO Reentry Services LLC
DateAmountContributor as filedLocator
2026-07-31$413,000GEO REENTRY SERVICES LLCSchedule A, line 17, transaction SA17.5475, image 202608209903328714 · memo: NON-CONTRIBUTION: TAXED AS A CORPORATION
2026-07-16$1,000,000GEO REENTRY SERVICES LLCSchedule A, line 17, transaction SA17.5476, image 202608209903328714 · memo: NON-CONTRIBUTION: TAXED AS A CORPORATION
2026-04-24$1,000,000GEO REENTRY SERVICES LLCSchedule A, line 17, transaction SA17.5311, file 1978142, image 202605209870174576 · memo: NON-CONTRIBUTION: TAXED AS A CORPORATION
2026-03-09$1,000,000GEO REENTRY SERVICES LLCSchedule A, line 17, transaction SA17.5251, file 1970306, image 202604209866614095 · memo: NON-CONTRIBUTION: TAXED AS A CORPORATION
2025-10-09$1,000,000GEO REENTRY SERVICES LLCSchedule A, line 17, transaction SA17.4958, file 1930534, image 202601029793901862 · memo: NON-CONTRIBUTION: TAXED AS A CORPORATION

What this does not establish

The filing establishes what MAGA Inc. reported receiving on this date from the entity named in the filing. It does not establish the donor entity's own federal contract or bid status, its tax classification, the account the funds came from, any parent-company liability, or any connection to a government award.

Exact legal entities

Named entities are never merged

The donor named in MAGA Inc.'s filings is GEO Reentry Services LLC. SEC subsidiary exhibits list GEO Reentry Services, LLC and GEO Reentry, Inc. as separate entities. Nothing recorded for one entity is attributed to the other, and nothing recorded for a subsidiary is attributed to The GEO Group, Inc.

  • GEO Reentry Services LLC

    Limited liability company

    Not the same as · GEO Reentry, Inc.; The GEO Group, Inc.

    SEC subsidiary exhibits list GEO Reentry Services, LLC among The GEO Group, Inc. subsidiaries.

    What this does not establish

    A parent relationship does not transfer contract status, bid status, tax classification or liability between entities, and it does not make this LLC interchangeable with GEO Reentry, Inc.

  • GEO Reentry, Inc.

    Corporation

    Not the same as · GEO Reentry Services LLC; The GEO Group, Inc.

    Listed separately from GEO Reentry Services, LLC in the 2024 SEC subsidiary exhibit. The 2025 exhibit does not list it, which does not establish dissolution or inactivity because Exhibit 21 may omit non-significant subsidiaries.

    What this does not establish

    Nothing recorded for this entity may be attributed to GEO Reentry Services LLC.

  • The GEO Group, Inc.

    Corporation

    Not the same as · GEO Reentry Services LLC; GEO Reentry, Inc.

    What this does not establish

    Parent-level disclosures do not establish which subsidiary held a contract, made a payment, or bid on federal work.

03a

Contractor-status review, by contribution date

For each reported receipt date: the exact prime recipient named in the reviewed Houston records, which donor-status questions remain unresolved, and the legal conclusion, which is not determined.

Contractor-status review, by contribution date

5 contribution dates · donor of record GEO Reentry Services, LLC · as of 2026-08-21

Exact donor not identified as the Houston prime recipient; bidder, other-contract, tax, and source-account status remain unresolved.

Contractor-status review for each reported contribution date
DateAmountKnown Houston prime recipient at that dateDonor matchLegal conclusion
2025-10-09$1,000,00015BRRC21D00000242 — GEO Reentry, Inc. (sibling corporation)official USAspending IDV active through June 30, 2026Not identified in reviewed Houston prime recordsNot determined
2026-03-09$1,000,00015BRRC21D00000242 — GEO Reentry, Inc. (sibling corporation)official USAspending IDV active through June 30, 2026Not identified in reviewed Houston prime recordsNot determined
2026-04-24$1,000,00015BRRC21D00000242 — GEO Reentry, Inc. (sibling corporation)official USAspending IDV active through June 30, 2026Not identified in reviewed Houston prime recordsNot determined
2026-07-16$1,000,00015BRRC26D00000003 — GEO Reentry, Inc. (sibling corporation)BOP current contractor directory; award timing additionally appears in a SAM-data mirror pending official snapshotNot identified in reviewed Houston prime recordsNot determined
2026-07-31$413,00015BRRC26D00000003 — GEO Reentry, Inc. (sibling corporation)BOP current contractor directory; award timing additionally appears in a SAM-data mirror pending official snapshotNot identified in reviewed Houston prime recordsNot determined
2025-10-09 · $1,000,000 · transaction SA17.4958
Donor of record
GEO Reentry Services, LLC
Donor operational role
Court-described owner/operator of Leidel in 2025 — not a prime-contract role
Bid or negotiation status
Unresolved
Other direct federal contract
Unresolved
Federal subaward status
Unresolved
Tax election
Recipient-reported corporate treatment, not independently verified
Source account
Unresolved
Procurement context
New Houston procurement was publicly pending; all offerors not identified.
Legal conclusion
Not determined

What this does not establish

This status review does not determine that the receipt was lawful or prohibited, and does not establish that the donor LLC had no other federal contract or bid.

2026-03-09 · $1,000,000 · transaction SA17.5251
Donor of record
GEO Reentry Services, LLC
Donor operational role
Court-described owner/operator of Leidel in 2025 — not a prime-contract role
Bid or negotiation status
Unresolved
Other direct federal contract
Unresolved
Federal subaward status
Unresolved
Tax election
Recipient-reported corporate treatment, not independently verified
Source account
Unresolved
Procurement context
New Houston procurement was publicly pending; all offerors not identified.
Legal conclusion
Not determined

What this does not establish

This status review does not determine that the receipt was lawful or prohibited, and does not establish that the donor LLC had no other federal contract or bid.

2026-04-24 · $1,000,000 · transaction SA17.5311
Donor of record
GEO Reentry Services, LLC
Donor operational role
Court-described owner/operator of Leidel in 2025 — not a prime-contract role
Bid or negotiation status
Unresolved
Other direct federal contract
Unresolved
Federal subaward status
Unresolved
Tax election
Recipient-reported corporate treatment, not independently verified
Source account
Unresolved
Procurement context
New Houston award was reported to GEO Reentry, Inc.; all offerors still not identified.
Legal conclusion
Not determined

What this does not establish

This status review does not determine that the receipt was lawful or prohibited, and does not establish that the donor LLC had no other federal contract or bid.

2026-07-16 · $1,000,000 · transaction SA17.5476
Donor of record
GEO Reentry Services, LLC
Donor operational role
Court-described owner/operator of Leidel in 2025 — not a prime-contract role
Bid or negotiation status
Unresolved
Other direct federal contract
Unresolved
Federal subaward status
Unresolved
Tax election
Recipient-reported corporate treatment, not independently verified
Source account
Unresolved
Procurement context
New Houston award was reported to GEO Reentry, Inc.; all offerors still not identified.
Legal conclusion
Not determined

What this does not establish

This status review does not determine that the receipt was lawful or prohibited, and does not establish that the donor LLC had no other federal contract or bid.

2026-07-31 · $413,000 · transaction SA17.5475
Donor of record
GEO Reentry Services, LLC
Donor operational role
Court-described owner/operator of Leidel in 2025 — not a prime-contract role
Bid or negotiation status
Unresolved
Other direct federal contract
Unresolved
Federal subaward status
Unresolved
Tax election
Recipient-reported corporate treatment, not independently verified
Source account
Unresolved
Procurement context
New Houston award was reported to GEO Reentry, Inc.; all offerors still not identified.
Legal conclusion
Not determined

What this does not establish

This status review does not determine that the receipt was lawful or prohibited, and does not establish that the donor LLC had no other federal contract or bid.

  • Operating a facility on behalf of a federal agency does not by itself establish that the operator is the direct federal contracting person.
  • A prime award to GEO Reentry, Inc. cannot be assigned to GEO Reentry Services, LLC.
  • No-result award searches do not prove that no other contract or bid existed.
  • The FEC memo stating corporate tax treatment is recipient-reported and is not an independently obtained tax-election record.
  • No reviewed record determines that any of the five receipts was lawful or prohibited.
Conclusions deliberately withheld
  • Not published: The donor LLC was a federal contractor on a contribution date.
  • Not published: The donor LLC was not a federal contractor on a contribution date.
  • Not published: The donor LLC bid on the Houston solicitation.
  • Not published: The donor LLC did not bid on the Houston solicitation.
  • Not published: The contributions violated federal law.
  • Not published: The contributions were cleared or conclusively lawful.
  • Not published: MAGA Inc. knew or should have known any contributor was ineligible.

Reviewed records naming each entity

Shown separately · never aggregated

Each record below stands alone. Nothing here is combined, netted or totalled, and no record determines whether any receipt was permitted or prohibited.

Why these entities cannot be merged

Exact legal names · roles kept apart

Three separate legal entities are involved. An award naming one of them is not an award naming another, and operating a facility is not the same as holding the contract for it.

What remains needed

6 open records questions · none is a finding

  • Did GEO Reentry Services, LLC hold any direct federal prime contract on a contribution date outside the reviewed Houston records?

    Open · No legal conclusion.

    • Records needed: Official USAspending exact-name and UEI results
    • Records needed: FPDS/SAM entity-award export
    • Records needed: Novations, predecessor and successor records

  • Did GEO Reentry Services, LLC respond to, bid on, or negotiate the 2024–2026 Houston BOP procurement or another federal solicitation?

    Open · Contribution-period prohibition cannot be resolved because the ban can begin before award.

    • Records needed: Bidders list
    • Records needed: Source-selection record
    • Records needed: Offeror correspondence
    • Records needed: Proposal receipt log
    • Records needed: Competitive range and negotiation records

  • Was GEO Reentry Services, LLC a subawardee or affiliate service provider under a sibling prime?

    Open · Operational role remains distinct from direct federal contractual privity.

    • Records needed: Federal subaward records
    • Records needed: Intercompany service agreement
    • Records needed: Invoices and payment ledger

  • What IRS tax classification did the LLC use on each receipt date?

    Open · The filing memo is shown as recipient-reported classification, not independent proof.

    • Records needed: MAGA Inc. LLC donor-response form
    • Records needed: W-9 or equivalent certification
    • Records needed: Tax-election representation

  • Which legal entity owned the account from which each payment was made?

    Open · No source-of-funds or contribution-in-the-name-of-another conclusion.

    • Records needed: Contribution check or wire record
    • Records needed: Bank-account title
    • Records needed: General-ledger entry
    • Records needed: Intercompany funding record

  • What eligibility review did MAGA Inc. perform for the LLC receipts?

    Open · No conclusion about committee knowledge, best efforts, or acceptance of a prohibited source.

    • Records needed: Donor questionnaire
    • Records needed: Compliance correspondence
    • Records needed: Legal review
    • Records needed: Refund or redesignation records

These are records the reviewed sources do not contain. A missing record is a gap in the evidence, not a finding about anyone's conduct, and a search that returned nothing does not establish that nothing exists.

04

Reported disbursements and current institutional roles

Two separately observed facts, placed side by side and nothing more.

A reported PAC disbursement and a current institutional role are two separately observed facts. Their overlap does not establish that any contribution changed a vote, hearing, appropriation, contract or oversight action.

Reported PAC disbursements beside the recipient’s current institutional role
Reported byRecipientReported amountDatesCurrent institutional role
CoreCivic PACAndrew Garbarino$10,0002025-09-23, 2026-04-22Chair, U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security

What this does not establish

The records establish PAC disbursements and a current office role. They do not establish influence, exchange, or action taken because of the money.

CoreCivic PACKatie Britt$2,5002025-09-23Chair, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security

What this does not establish

The records establish a PAC disbursement and a current appropriations role. They do not establish influence, exchange, or action taken because of the money.

CoreCivic PACBill Hagerty$2,5002025-09-23Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security

What this does not establish

The records establish a PAC disbursement and a committee role only.

CoreCivic PACShelley Moore Capito$2,5002025-10-20Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security

What this does not establish

The records establish a PAC disbursement and a committee role only.

CoreCivic PACCindy Hyde-Smith$2,5002025-10-20Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security

What this does not establish

The records establish a PAC disbursement and a committee role only.

CoreCivic PACSusan Collins$5,0002026-04-22Chair, Senate Committee on Appropriations

What this does not establish

The records establish a PAC disbursement and a committee role only.

05

Prior public service in company roles

Company proxy-statement biographies, reproduced as disclosed.

These are company proxy-statement biographies. Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information or contract causation. No record here is scored, ranked or converted into an access claim.

  • Matthew T. Albence

    The GEO Group · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Senior Vice President, Client Relations
    Prior public role
    ICE roles from May 2012 through August 2020, culminating as Acting Director

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Daniel Ragsdale

    The GEO Group · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Senior Vice President, Contract Administration and Compliance
    Prior public role
    ICE, 1996–2017; Deputy Director, 2012–2017

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Julie Myers Wood

    The GEO Group · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Director
    Prior public role
    Head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2006–2008

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Paul Laird

    The GEO Group · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Senior Vice President, Secure Services
    Prior public role
    29 years at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, including Regional Director

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Stacia A. Hylton

    CoreCivic · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Director
    Prior public role
    Director, U.S. Marshals Service, 2010–2015; Federal Detention Trustee, 2004–2010

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Harley G. Lappin

    CoreCivic · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Director; former CoreCivic EVP and Chief Corrections Officer
    Prior public role
    Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 2003–2011

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  • Thurgood Marshall Jr.

    CoreCivic · company proxy biography

    Company role
    Director; chair of board Risk Committee
    Prior public role
    Former White House Cabinet Secretary and Senate committee counsel

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

06

Investigation queue

Open questions and pending records requests. Nothing here is a finding.

These are open questions and pending records requests. None of them is a finding, and none carries a conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  1. Resolve the donor LLC's federal contract and bid status for each date, obtain its tax classification and bank-account attribution, and preserve the exact FEC amendment lineage.

    Open · unresolved

    MAGA Inc. reported $4.413 million from GEO Reentry Services LLC across five receipts

    What this does not establish

    The donor named in the filing is GEO Reentry Services LLC. SEC exhibits establish it as a GEO subsidiary, but they also distinguish it from GEO Reentry, Inc. The current record does not establish that the donor LLC itself held or negotiated a federal contract during each donation. Therefore this packet does not characterize the receipts as illegal federal-contractor contributions.

  2. Build recipient-level state and 527 ledgers, beginning with Florida, while preserving company treasury, employee PAC, 527, and federal PAC semantics as separate channels.

    Open · unresolved

    Corporate treasury money, not employee PAC money, dominates disclosed political contributions

    What this does not establish

    These are company-published aggregates with different recipient categories and legal channels. They are not interchangeable with federal PAC transactions, lobbying expense, independent expenditures, or contract revenue.

  3. Request or reconstruct the omitted line(s) from federal and state transaction records.

    Open · unresolved

    CoreCivic's 2025 political report contains a $1,434.08 PAC reconciliation discrepancy

    What this does not establish

    The discrepancy is small relative to the total and does not establish misconduct. It does establish that voluntary company disclosure should be reconciled against underlying filings rather than treated as self-authenticating.

  4. Obtain appraisals, fairness materials, negotiation records, management-contract amendments, and government buy-versus-lease analyses for each public acquisition.

    Open · unresolved

    Public purchases of detention real estate become private capital-allocation events

    What this does not establish

    These sequences are documented corporate finance. They do not, by themselves, establish overpayment, favoritism, unlawful subsidy, or that a particular public dollar funded a particular share repurchase.

  5. Map subsidiary-level awards and subawards for pharmacy, transport, medical, monitoring, and case-management services to the same people and facilities.

    Open · unresolved

    The detention companies are expanding across the custody lifecycle

    What this does not establish

    Vertical breadth does not establish improper tying or self-dealing. It does identify where subcontracts, related-party pricing, bundled procurements, and cross-segment incentives deserve review.

  6. Request ethics agreements, recusal statements, post-employment reviews, meeting calendars, and communications where legally obtainable.

    Open · unresolved

    Former detention administrators occupy client-relations, contract-compliance, operations, and board-oversight roles

    What this does not establish

    Prior public service followed by private employment is not evidence of influence, preferential access, misuse of information, or contract causation. The placement of those biographies nevertheless defines a concrete relationship map for further records work.

  7. Build a time-aware decision ledger for hearings, letters, votes, markups, appropriations, and facility-specific interventions, with no causation edge absent direct evidence.

    Open · unresolved

    Reviewed CoreCivic PAC disbursements overlap current DHS oversight and appropriations roles

    What this does not establish

    A PAC contribution and an institutional role are separately observed facts. The overlap does not establish that the contribution changed a vote, hearing, appropriation, contract, or oversight action.

  8. Seek visitor logs, calendars, meeting materials, procurement communications, and HHS/ACF/BOP contract dockets matching the filing period.

    Open · unresolved

    A GEO outside-firm filing names White House, HHS, ACF, and BOP work on detention-center contracts

    What this does not establish

    The filing establishes the registrant's disclosure, not that any meeting occurred beyond what was reported, that any official was persuaded, or that any contract resulted.

  9. Ingest Florida Division of Elections transactions, resolve recipients, and compare against facility management contracts, state procurement, appropriations, and executive actions.

    Open · unresolved

    Florida is GEO's largest disclosed state and local political-contribution basin

    What this does not establish

    The aggregate does not identify every recipient, filing lineage, refund, or related state action. No recipient-level conclusion is published from the aggregate alone.

  10. Records request: GEO Reentry Services LLC and MAGA Inc.

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • Every contract, order, grant, cooperative agreement, bid, proposal, or novation naming `GEO Reentry Services LLC`
    • Entity identifiers: UEI, DUNS, CAGE, TIN/EIN where releasable, SAM registration, parent and predecessor fields
    • Contract performance and negotiation dates covering 2025-10-09 through 2026-07-31
    • Any responsibility determinations and representations concerning federal-contractor political activity
    • Raw Schedule A versions for transaction IDs `SA17.4958`, `SA17.5251`, `SA17.5311`, `SA17.5476`, and `SA17.5475`
    • Filing amendments, donor correspondence, attribution forms, refund records, and committee review notes
    • The LLC donor-response form and tax-classification representation, if obtained by MAGA Inc.
    • Donor authorization and approval records
    • Account ownership and source-of-funds documentation
    • Board or officer approval
    • Internal legal review of federal-contractor restrictions

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  11. Records request: Florida political contributions

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • GEO Group and every GEO subsidiary
    • 2024–2026 corporate contributions
    • Refunds, amendments, transfers, committees, candidates, and electioneering entities
    • Recipient committee officers and affiliated organizations

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  12. Records request: Public facility acquisitions

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • Independent appraisals and valuation reports
    • Buy-versus-lease analyses
    • Negotiation memoranda and approval chains
    • Environmental, title, condition, and capital-needs assessments
    • Management-contract amendments after public purchase
    • Government estimates of lifecycle operating cost
    • Competing offers, market comparables, and fairness materials

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  13. Records request: Lobbying contacts

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • Calendars, visitor logs, meeting invitations, agendas, attendee lists
    • Presentations, leave-behinds, procurement forecasts, and follow-up correspondence
    • Procurement-integrity and ethics reviews
    • Meeting records involving named lobbyists and company executives

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  14. Records request: Revolving-door controls

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • Post-employment ethics opinions
    • Recusal agreements
    • 18 U.S.C. § 207 guidance
    • Agency ethics-office communications
    • Waivers or screening arrangements
    • Company-side compliance policies governing former officials

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

  15. Records request: Vertical-service contracting

    Open · unresolved

    Named records that would resolve an open question in this wave.

    • Pharmacy
    • Medical staffing
    • Transportation
    • Food
    • Electronic monitoring
    • Location monitoring
    • Case management
    • Reentry
    • Facility maintenance and construction

    What this does not establish

    A pending records request is not a finding and carries no conclusion about any person, entity or agency.

07

Source docket

Every record cited on this page.