What public records establish about MVM, Inc.: an active passenger carrier and federal contractor, one large ICE order for nationwide transport of unaccompanied children and family units, a narrow current governance record, selected labor and employment matters, historical temporary-holding records, and the ownership, route, staffing, and performance evidence that remains unavailable.
What these records do not establish The award records do not establish how many children or family members were transported, on what routes, by which personnel, or under what conditions. USAspending reports the same legal entity as its own parent recipient. No subsidiary or subcontractor structure is established by the award record.
01
Who this company is on the record
Identity, public-company status and security identity, as published in the cited filings.
Legal name
MVM, INC.
Display name
MVM, Inc.
Legal form and jurisdiction
Corporation · California
Lifecycle status
active
foreign registration
854940
Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. A foreign registration does not establish beneficial ownership or every jurisdiction of operation.
Registry identifier
95-3396082
Florida Department of State, FEI/EIN as published. The identifier does not establish ownership, bank-account attribution, or transaction tax treatment.
Registry identifier
2554986
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Active carrier registration does not establish any particular route, trip, passenger, or ICE facility.
Registry identifier
MC-1488086
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Operating authority does not establish the scope or performance of PIID 70CDCR25FR0000026.
Also filed as
M V M, INC. · M V M INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, INC.
Spellings and brands carried for the same legal entity in the cited records. A different spelling is not a different company, and a brand is not a subsidiary.
Principal executive office
44620 GUILFORD DRIVE, SUITE 150, ASHBURN, VA 20147
Corporate address as published in this record. Registries print more than one address for this company, and none is selected here as the definitive current headquarters. Not a detention facility.
Address as published
19775 BELMONT EXECUTIVE PLAZA SUITE 400, ASHBURN, VA 20147
Corporate address as published in this record. Registries print more than one address for this company, and none is selected here as the definitive current headquarters. Not a detention facility.
Capital status as of January 1, 2023
privately held
Washington Technology's 2023 Top 100 profile classified MVM as privately held.
Completeness
Partial dossier
Reviewed scope covers exact identity, federal carrier authority, two source-specific addresses, one current officer/director, one indexed ICE award and eight actions, five legal or labor matters, two historical accountability records, and ten open questions. It is not a complete ownership, board, award, trip, passenger, subcontractor, political-finance, or current-practice census. Reviewed August 24, 2026.
Company websiteA company website is a party source, not independent verification.
Names, titles and dates exactly as the cited records publish them. A title establishes no participation in a contract, a subsidiary's work, or a government decision.
Board recorded at the annual meeting (1)
Names and titles as published in the cited proxy statement and voting-results filing.
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Kevin Marquez
President
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Kevin Marquez
Secretary
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Kevin Marquez
Treasurer
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
03
What this project traces to this recipient
Represented in this dataset. Not company revenue, not total federal business, not market share.
Award records held
1
Current award value
$360,294,907.63
Base and exercised options on 1 of 1 awards. Not cash paid.
Obligated
$165,036,645.52
Legally committed on 1 of 1 awards.
Outlayed
$131,141,192.86
Cash disbursed across all 1 awards.
Potential value
$360,294,907.63
Ceiling if every option is exercised. It may never be reached.
Facilities named in these awards
0
Only where the award description names the facility and a reviewer matched it.
Awards naming an unmatched facility
0
The record names a facility; no confirmed directory row exists in this extract.
Awards identifying no facility
1
Counted here rather than assigned to a site on a guess.
Earliest to latest period
Apr 01, 2024 → Mar 31, 2026
Across the awards held here, not the recipient's full contracting history.
Entity resolution: USAspending reports the same legal entity as its own parent recipient. No subsidiary or subcontractor structure is established by the award record.
04
When these awards run
One row per award, spanning only the period the source reports. Bar length encodes time, never money.
Current period of performance
Potential period if options are exercised
A dated contract action
Source: USAspending.gov, retrieved 2026-08-20. Bar length encodes time only. It carries no information about amount.
Award periods as a table (1)
Reported period of performance and current value for each award
Award
Start
Current end
Potential end
Current value
70CDCR25FR0000026
Apr 01, 2024
Mar 31, 2026
Jul 31, 2026
$360,294,907.63
05
Award records
Current status of the work
The award record carries a period start of April 1, 2024, a signature date of March 6, 2025, a current period end of March 31, 2026, a potential period end of July 31, 2026, and an additional-work action dated July 1, 2026. Those fields are preserved as reported; the relationship between the July action and the recorded current period end is not established here.
THIS AWARD ESTABLISHES A NEW TASK ORDER FOR THE NATIONWIDE TRANSPORTATION OF UNACCOMPANIED MINORS (UC) AND FAMILY UNITS (FAMU).
Obligated $165,036,645.52 · Outlayed $131,141,192.86 · 8 contract actions · Period to March 31, 2026
Facility: The record does not identify a facility — The order funds nationwide ground transportation of unaccompanied minors and family units. It names no facility. The record does not identify a facility. Place of performance, city and area of responsibility are not facility identity.
A facility appears here only where the award's own description names it. Nothing is inferred from a recipient's known portfolio.
No award record held for this recipient names a facility that matches a row in this project's ICE directory extract. That is a limit of the records indexed here, not a finding that the recipient operates no facility.
The records for 70CDCR25FR0000026 do not identify a facility. Those awards are excluded from every facility total on this site.
07
Action-to-evidence crosswalk
Each contract action beside the source registry entry it was read from, the retrieval provenance of that snapshot, and the recorded corporate relationships whose own period contains the action date.
Recorded relationships in effect on this action date
No recorded relationship has a period containing this action date.
The crosswalk states where each action was read from and which recorded relationships were in effect on its date. A relationship in effect on an action date did not thereby sign, price, perform, receive, or benefit from that action, and no money on an action is assigned to a related entity, a person, a facility, or a service location.
08
Every contract action on this award
One row per action the award record reports, in date order, with the obligation each action moved and the running total. Select a modification number to read the exact source fields behind that row.
70CDCR25FR0000026 · 8 contract actions
Cumulative reported obligation
Current value (exercised options) — $360,294,907.63
Cash outlayed to date, as of 2026-08-20 — $131,141,192.86
Source: USAspending.gov award 70CDCR25FR0000026, retrieved 2026-08-20. Unit: US dollars, nominal, not inflation-adjusted.
The line steps only on dates the source records. Cash outlay is reported as a single to-date total with no action-level dates, so it is drawn as one marker at the retrieval date and never as a line across time. Each action mark is keyboard focusable.
Contract actions as a table (8) — select a modification for its evidence trace
Every contract action reported for award 70CDCR25FR0000026
Action date
Mod
Action
This action
Cumulative obligation
Mar 06, 2025
DELIVERY ORDER
$41,313,666.00
$41,313,666.00
May 07, 2025
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$41,313,666.00
Aug 01, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$30,000,000.00
$71,313,666.00
Aug 29, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$12,324,306.80
$83,637,972.80
Sep 30, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$30,093,914.12
$113,731,886.92
Jan 16, 2026
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$20,674,627.00
$134,406,513.92
Feb 09, 2026
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$10,689,659.98
$145,096,173.90
Jul 01, 2026
ADDITIONAL WORK (NEW AGREEMENT, JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED)
$19,940,471.62
$165,036,645.52
09
Legal and oversight record
Procedural posture as the cited records state it. A vote, a filing account or an inquiry is not a finding of wrongdoing.
MVM protest of GSA unaccompanied-child transportation award
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-421788.3; B-421788.4 · Closed March 5, 2024 · Status as of March 5, 2024
Protest sustained
Parties as published
MVM, Inc. — Protester
Acuity-CHS, LLC — Awardee
General Services Administration — Agency
Procedural record
March 5, 2024 · decision
GAO sustained MVM's protest of a national HHS transportation-services award for unaccompanied children.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · order · Sustained
GAO concluded that GSA's evaluation of the awardee's proposed key personnel and responsibility determination were unreasonable or inadequately documented.
The decision does not find that MVM performed the contract, was entitled to award, or meets every requirement of the current ICE order.
The sustained protest does not establish MVM's current performance, treatment of passengers, operation of any facility, or entitlement to the protested HHS award.
National Labor Relations Board · order · Recorded voting unit
The voting unit covered full-time and regular part-time armed and unarmed Transportation Specialists performing guard duties in El Paso, Texas.
The unit description does not identify an ICE facility, current route, current award, labor-law violation, or conditions experienced by transported people.
National Labor Relations Board · order · Recorded voting unit
The voting unit covered Child and Family Protection Care Specialists at an MVM worksite in San Antonio, Texas.
A worksite address is not automatically a detention facility, and the unit description does not establish current contract scope or treatment of children and families.
EEOC national-origin discrimination and retaliation matter
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · 8:17-cv-02864 · Filed September 29, 2017 · Closed December 17, 2020 · Status as of December 17, 2020
Resolved by two-year consent decree
Parties as published
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — Plaintiff
MVM, Inc. — Defendant
Procedural record
December 17, 2020 · consent decree announced
EEOC announced a two-year consent decree providing $1.6 million in monetary relief, injunctive terms, policy changes, and other equitable relief.
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · 1:17-cv-02881-TDC · Filed September 29, 2017 · Closed January 11, 2021 · Status as of January 11, 2021
Resolved by two-year consent decree
Parties as published
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission — Plaintiff
MVM, Inc. — Defendant
Procedural record
January 11, 2021 · consent decree announced
EEOC announced a two-year consent decree providing $200,000 in monetary relief, an injunction, training, monitoring, and reporting requirements.
Historical overnight stays at an MVM Phoenix office
Arizona Public Media · July 16, 2018
Secondary reporting preserves the company admission, response, and state inspection limitation.
Company acknowledged some children stayed overnight
After an earlier denial, MVM acknowledged that some children had remained overnight at the Phoenix office because of delays or placement issues.
The report does not establish a current practice, a permanent detention facility, the number of all overnight stays, or the scope of today's ICE award.
Historical hotel detention and expulsion transport during 2020
Associated Press · July 22, 2020
Credible secondary reporting supplies a historical transport-and-temporary-holding record.
Government records showed hotel use involving children
AP reported from government records that hotels in Phoenix, El Paso, and McAllen were used in the pandemic expulsion system and that MVM transportation specialists were involved in guarding and moving children.
The report does not establish that MVM owned the hotels, that every stay had the same duration, or that the practice continues under the current award.
AP reported 186 hotel uses and 169 children in two reviewed months
AP reported that government data showed 186 hotel uses and 169 children during April and June 2020, including very young children and one five-year-old held for 19 days.
The figures are a bounded historical dataset, not a complete count for all dates, all hotels, all MVM work, or the current award.
Questions the reviewed records do not answer, with the evidence that is missing and where we are looking for it.
What this does not establish
An open question records missing evidence. It is not a finding.
ownership control
Who currently owns and controls MVM, Inc.?
Why it matters
A 2023 industry profile classified MVM as privately held, while the 2026 state filing identifies officers but does not disclose shareholders or beneficial owners.
Missing evidence
Current shareholder or member records; Voting and control rights; Any parent or holding company; Transaction history after 2023
Where we are looking
California corporate records; company governance records; lender documents; SAM responsibility records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Who currently owns and controls MVM, Inc.? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
governance
Who are the complete current directors and executive officers of MVM, Inc., and when did their roles begin?
Why it matters
The 2026 Florida record lists Kevin Marquez in five roles but does not establish that he is the only director or officer.
Missing evidence
Complete board roster; Officer roster; Role effective dates; Committee or governance structure
Where we are looking
California corporate records; company governance records; state annual reports
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Who are the complete current directors and executive officers of MVM, Inc., and when did their roles begin? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
identity location
Which Ashburn address is the current headquarters, and why do the Florida and FMCSA records differ?
Why it matters
The records publish two different current-at-source Ashburn addresses. Neither should silently overwrite the other.
Missing evidence
Current headquarters statement; Address effective dates; Carrier-location explanation
Where we are looking
Company legal notices; California records; FMCSA MCS-150 history; Florida filing images
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Which Ashburn address is the current headquarters, and why do the Florida and FMCSA records differ? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
workforce
What is MVM's current workforce size and how is it defined?
Why it matters
Two current company pages report materially different figures: over 800 employees and 1,500+ personnel.
Missing evidence
As-of date for each count; Employee versus contractor definitions; Domestic versus total scope
Where we are looking
Company workforce disclosure; EEO-1 or public workforce reports; contract staffing records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What is MVM's current workforce size and how is it defined? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
identity history
What are MVM's complete current and historical SAM, CAGE, DUNS, UEI, carrier, and legal-name identifiers?
Why it matters
The branch has a UEI and the federal carrier record supplies USDOT and MC numbers, but official CAGE/DUNS lineage and name-history documents were not obtained.
Missing evidence
Official CAGE record; DUNS-to-UEI migration; SAM entity history; Name-change or novation records
Where we are looking
SAM.gov; Defense Logistics Agency CAGE records; contract files; California registry
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What are MVM's complete current and historical SAM, CAGE, DUNS, UEI, carrier, and legal-name identifiers? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
award coverage
What is the complete federal award and subcontract universe for MVM under all reviewed names?
Why it matters
The current branch indexes one ICE order, while official and company records show a broader history across several federal agencies.
Missing evidence
Prime awards; Task orders and IDIQs; Subawards; Expired and predecessor awards; Bid and negotiation periods
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What is the complete federal award and subcontract universe for MVM under all reviewed names? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
contract performance
How many people were transported under PIID 70CDCR25FR0000026, on which routes, with what staffing and care standards?
Why it matters
The award records nationwide scope and money but no passenger count, trip ledger, route, staffing level, vehicle assignment, custody handoff, or performance measure.
Missing evidence
Trip and passenger records; Route logs; Vehicle and driver records; Staffing plans; Performance and incident reports
Where we are looking
ICE contract file; task-order deliverables; FMCSA inspection records; records requests
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: How many people were transported under PIID 70CDCR25FR0000026, on which routes, with what staffing and care standards? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
award status
How should the award's recorded dates be reconciled with the July 1, 2026 additional-work action?
Why it matters
The generated record carries a period start before the order was signed, a current period end of March 31, 2026, a potential end of July 31, 2026, and an additional-work action on July 1.
Missing evidence
Raw FPDS action history; Task-order modification text; Option and period-of-performance clauses; Current closeout status
Where we are looking
USAspending raw JSON; FPDS; ICE contract file; modification P00007
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: How should the award's recorded dates be reconciled with the July 1, 2026 additional-work action? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
subcontracting and sites
Which subcontractors, airlines, hotels, offices, temporary sites, and service providers supported MVM transport work in each period?
Why it matters
Historical reporting identifies temporary offices and hotels, but the current award does not publish a subcontractor or site roster.
Missing evidence
Subcontract plan; Hotel and lodging agreements; Air and ground carriers; Temporary holding protocols; Site use dates
Where we are looking
Prime contract file; subaward records; local records; court records; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: Which subcontractors, airlines, hotels, offices, temporary sites, and service providers supported MVM transport work in each period? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
political finance
What lobbying, political-contribution, trade-association, and government-affairs activity is attributable to MVM or verified leaders?
Why it matters
The reviewed Slice 7 source set did not establish a complete political-activity record. A failed search is not evidence that none exists.
Missing evidence
Federal and state lobbying registrations; PAC or personal transactions; Trade-association memberships; Government contacts
Where we are looking
Senate LDA; FEC; state campaign-finance systems; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Reviewed Slice 7 source set and current Detention Receipts branch: What lobbying, political-contribution, trade-association, and government-affairs activity is attributable to MVM or verified leaders? (partial). The packet records the source-supported portion and preserves the unresolved remainder.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, an undisclosed contract, or an unreported political relationship exists.
Edges are drawn only from records cited on this site: award recipients, parent recipients, awarding agency, and named performance locations. There is no influence score, no lobbying edge without a filing, and no edge inferred from timing or name similarity. A missing edge means no source, not no relationship.
12
Corporate case-file sources
Every source cited by the corporate sections above, once each.
13
Sources
Award figures retrieved from the USAspending.gov API on 2026-08-20. Amounts are nominal US dollars as reported by the awarding agency.