What public records establish about InGenesis, Inc.: a Texas healthcare-workforce company holding ICE Health Service Corps task order 3; eleven generated contract actions; six named but unallocated service-site labels; current-at-source leadership; historical acquisitions and joint ventures; federal procurement and labor records; and an unusual, source-documented overlap between InGenesis leadership, Healthcare Standards Institute governance, and HSI certification that raises precise unanswered questions without establishing compromised certification.
What these records do not establish Holding a staffing order does not establish who provided care to any person, at what staffing level, or to what clinical standard. USAspending reports the same legal entity as its own parent recipient.
01
Who this company is on the record
Identity, public-company status and security identity, as published in the cited filings.
Legal name
InGenesis, Inc.
Display name
InGenesis
Legal form and jurisdiction
Corporation · Texas
Lifecycle status
active
CAGE code
3EX66
Secondary SAM-derived federal-registration profile. The secondary profile is not a substitute for a direct DLA CAGE record.
Registry identifier
F14619591
Arizona Corporation Commission record through secondary mirror. The Arizona identifier is not the Texas formation identifier or a federal award identifier.
Also filed as
INGENESIS INC · InGenesis
Spellings and brands carried for the same legal entity in the cited records. A different spelling is not a different company, and a brand is not a subsidiary.
Principal executive office
18756 Stone Oak Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78258
Corporate office as published in the cited filings. Not a detention facility.
Capital status as of January 10, 2018
privately held
Company-published description in the 2018 acquisition announcement: "privately held". Historical observation, not a current capital-status statement.
Completeness
Partial dossier
Reviewed scope covers exact identity, public identifiers, corporate address and website, nine current or historical roles, one time-bounded capital-status observation, three corporate-history events, one frozen ICE award with eleven runtime actions and eleven diagnostic anchors, six service-site labels, six procurement/court/labor matters, eighteen open questions, thirty-eight withheld conclusions, four research leads, and two append-only corrections. It is not a complete ownership, governance, IDIQ, facility-allocation, staffing-performance, certification-audit, clinical-outcome, political-finance, joint-venture, or federal-award census. Reviewed August 28, 2026.
Company websiteA company website is a party source, not independent verification.
Names, titles and dates exactly as the cited records publish them. A title establishes no participation in a contract, a subsidiary's work, or a government decision.
Board recorded at the annual meeting (1)
Names and titles as published in the cited proxy statement and voting-results filing.
Each amount keeps its own meaning and its own line. A sale price, an accounting gain, a repayment and a repurchase are different objects and are never added together.
InGenesis and STG form InGenesis STGi Partners, LLC
joint venture formation · historical-observation · Event June 1, 2011
Recorded for InGenesis, Inc. · org-stg-international
A federal court opinion states that InGenesis and STG formed InGenesis STGi Partners, LLC in June 2011 to pursue government healthcare-staffing work. The opinion describes InGenesis as managing operations, project and contract management, and government communications, while STG handled human-resources functions.
The opinion does not establish current joint-venture existence, current ownership percentages, current federal awards, or that STG and InGenesis are one company.
InGenesis acquires Kelly Services healthcare specialty business
business acquisition · closed-at-source · Event January 10, 2018 · Announced January 10, 2018
Recorded for InGenesis, Inc.
InGenesis announced an agreement to acquire Kelly Services healthcare specialty business unit and transition the unit and affected employees. Kelly later confirmed the divestiture in its annual report. Terms were not disclosed in the reviewed records.
The event does not establish acquisition price, current employee count, ownership of Kelly Services, or a relationship to the current ICE task order.
HSI certifies InGenesis to ISO 22956 while InGenesis leaders participate in HSI governance
certification and governance · current-at-source · Event August 21, 2023 · Announced August 21, 2023
Recorded for InGenesis, Inc.
HSI announced ANAB accreditation for its ISO 22956 certification program and identified InGenesis as the first organization certified by HSI to the standard. Current InGenesis and HSI pages identify Veronica Edwards as HSI president and Stephen Meigs on the HSI standards board.
The overlap does not establish self-certification, compromised impartiality, invalid certification, an undisclosed financial interest, or influence over the ICE award. The reviewed public sources do not expose the certificate scope, audit team, impartiality review, surveillance audits, or certification decision file.
MEDICAL STAFFING SERVICES FOR THE ICE HEALTH SERVICE CORPS (IHSC) TASK ORDER 3
Obligated $66,214,267.86 · Outlayed $38,474,864.23 · 11 contract actions · Period to September 22, 2026
Facility: Facility named in the record, no directory row confirmed — Six IHSC staffing sites named in modifications from March 2025: Buffalo, Caroline, Elizabeth, Folkston, Krome and Varick — From modification P00004 the order description lists six ICE Health Service Corps sites. The record does not apportion any amount between them, so no dollar figure is attached to any facility here. No confirmed row for this facility exists in the ICE workbook extract this project carries, so the award contributes nothing to directory population or capacity totals. Naming a facility in an award does not establish who operates it, who owns it, or how many people are held there.
A facility appears here only where the award's own description names it. Nothing is inferred from a recipient's known portfolio.
No award record held for this recipient names a facility that matches a row in this project's ICE directory extract. That is a limit of the records indexed here, not a finding that the recipient operates no facility.
The award description does name places: 6 service-site labels appear from modification P00004 onward. A short label is not a confirmed directory row and carries no amount, so the count above stays at the facilities a reviewer matched. The labels are listed in full below.
70CDCR24FR0000032 name a facility in the award record, but no confirmed row for it exists in this project's ICE directory extract. Those awards are excluded from every facility population and capacity total on this site.
10
Service-site labels named in the award
The award's own description names these places. It attaches no amount to any of them, and a short label is not a directory row.
70CDCR24FR0000032 · named from modification P00004, Mar 11, 2025
Buffalo
Caroline
Elizabeth
Folkston
Krome
Varick
From modification P00004 onward the award's own description names six service-site labels. The record attaches no amount to any of them.
Service-site labels named
6
Counted from the award description, not from a facility directory.
Site-level dollar allocations
0
The record apportions no amount to any named site.
Facility financial links
0
No money on this award reaches a facility record here.
Facility roles
0
No facility role is created from a site label.
Operator roles
0
A medical-staffing prime is not the facility operator.
What this does not establish Six labels do not establish six canonical facilities, six directory rows, six dollar allocations, an equal division of the award, continuous staffing at each site, or staffing levels and clinical disciplines anywhere.
08
Action-to-evidence crosswalk
Each contract action beside the source registry entry it was read from, the retrieval provenance of that snapshot, and the recorded corporate relationships whose own period contains the action date.
Recorded relationships in effect on this action date
No recorded relationship has a period containing this action date.
The crosswalk states where each action was read from and which recorded relationships were in effect on its date. A relationship in effect on an action date did not thereby sign, price, perform, receive, or benefit from that action, and no money on an action is assigned to a related entity, a person, a facility, or a service location.
09
Every contract action on this award
One row per action the award record reports, in date order, with the obligation each action moved and the running total. Select a modification number to read the exact source fields behind that row.
70CDCR24FR0000032 · 11 contract actions
Cumulative reported obligation
Potential value (all options) — $144,491,445.76
Current value (exercised options) — $84,816,725.76
Cash outlayed to date, as of 2026-08-20 — $38,474,864.23
Source: USAspending.gov award 70CDCR24FR0000032, retrieved 2026-08-20. Unit: US dollars, nominal, not inflation-adjusted.
The line steps only on dates the source records. Cash outlay is reported as a single to-date total with no action-level dates, so it is drawn as one marker at the retrieval date and never as a line across time. Each action mark is keyboard focusable.
Contract actions as a table (11) — select a modification for its evidence trace
Every contract action reported for award 70CDCR24FR0000032
Action date
Mod
Action
This action
Cumulative obligation
Sep 20, 2024
DELIVERY ORDER
$3,200,000.00
$3,200,000.00
Oct 15, 2024
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$3,200,000.00
Dec 13, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$4,904,354.17
$8,104,354.17
Jan 22, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$4,904,355.00
$13,008,709.17
Mar 11, 2025
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$13,008,709.17
Jun 03, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$6,500,000.00
$19,508,709.17
Aug 06, 2025
EXERCISE AN OPTION
$6,330,133.69
$25,838,842.86
Jan 20, 2026
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$25,838,842.86
Feb 05, 2026
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$11,728,152.00
$37,566,994.86
Jun 09, 2026
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$8,400,000.00
$45,966,994.86
Aug 11, 2026
EXERCISE AN OPTION
$20,247,273.00
$66,214,267.86
11
What these records do and do not establish
The money figures, the places the work is recorded in, and the limits of a staffing contract as evidence.
Obligation, outlay, current value and potential value are four separate fields
The reviewed award snapshot reports $66,214,267.86 obligated and $38,474,864.23 outlayed, a difference of $27,739,403.63. It reports $84,816,725.76 current award value and $144,491,445.76 potential award value. The reviewed award record does not explain the difference between obligation and outlay.
What this does not establish The difference does not establish unpaid completed work, outstanding invoices, unperformed work, savings, waste, contractor profit, overbilling, fraud, a refund, or a final closeout balance. Current value and potential value are neither obligations nor payments.
Award snapshot, retrieved 2026-08-20
Six named service-site labels, no site-level money
The award descriptions name six service-site labels. They establish neither six dollar allocations nor six automatic canonical facility joins. No facility financial link or operator role is created.
What this does not establish Naming a site does not establish a canonical facility join, a dollar amount at that site, continuous staffing there, staffing levels, clinical disciplines, or that each label is a distinct physical facility.
Award action descriptions from modification P00004 onward
A medical-staffing award is not a record of care
This award establishes procurement of medical staffing. It does not establish who worked a shift, staffing levels, vacancies, credential status, diagnosis, treatment, care adequacy, negligence, injury, death, or patient outcome.
What this does not establish A medical-staffing prime is not the detention-facility operator, and no record here links this award to any person's care or to any Human Cost record.
Modification P00010 is absent from the reviewed action history
The public action sequence skips from P00009 to P00011. Modification P00010 does not appear in the reviewed generated action history. The project does not establish whether it was cancelled, superseded, rejected, not publicly reported, or otherwise absent.
What this does not establish The absence is not established as a deletion, a concealment, an error, or evidence of misconduct.
Generated action ledger, retrieved 2026-08-20
Certification and standards governance
InGenesis leaders participate in HSI governance and HSI certified InGenesis to ISO 22956. That relationship is disclosed because it matters. The public record reviewed here does not establish self-certification. It does not establish compromised impartiality or influence over the ICE award.
What this does not establish The relationship does not establish self-certification, compromised impartiality, invalid certification, an audit conflict, or influence over the ICE award. The reviewed public record does not expose the certificate scope, audit team, impartiality review, certification decision, or surveillance history.
Procurement decisions are not performance or clinical findings
Procurement decisions establish proposal evaluations, protest outcomes, and recommendations. They are not clinical-performance or patient-harm findings.
What this does not establish GAO B-422389.2 is not established as concerning PIID 70CDCR24FR0000032; its five Texas sites are not current award sites; historical proposal weaknesses are not current performance; redacted 2016 details remain unknown; and the HHS Federal Occupational Health matter is not ICE evidence.
The Schofield Barracks record is a representation election
The Schofield Barracks case is a representation election for one local professional unit, not a labor-law violation or current company-wide union-coverage finding.
What this does not establish The case is not an unfair-labor-practice finding, a labor violation, an ICE worksite record, or current company-wide union coverage.
NLRB case 20-RC-346608
One corporation, no established owner or parent
The reviewed records resolve one Texas corporation and exact ICE recipient. They do not establish current beneficial owners, a parent company, or ownership percentages. The 2018 privately-held description is a historical, time-bounded observation, not a current capital-status statement.
What this does not establish No parent, owner, shareholder, control relationship, security, current capital status, or second InGenesis entity is established by these records.
12
Legal and oversight record
Procedural posture as the cited records state it. A vote, a filing account or an inquiry is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Maxim protest of five-site Texas IHSC task order issued to InGenesis
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-422389.2 · Closed August 21, 2024 · Status as of August 21, 2024
Protest sustained; GAO recommended terminating the InGenesis task order for convenience and reopening the competition
Parties as published
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. — Protester
InGenesis, Inc. — Awardee and intervenor
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Agency
Procedural record
October 20, 2023 · solicitation issued
ICE issued FOPR 70CDCR24R00000003 to IHSC medical-staffing IDIQ holders for El Paso, Houston, Montgomery, Port Isabel, and Taylor, Texas.
GAO sustained Maxim’s protest because the solicitation did not put offerors on notice that active SAM registration at proposal submission would be a disqualifying requirement.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Recommendation after sustained protest
GAO recommended terminating the task order issued to InGenesis for convenience, reopening the competition, including Maxim, making a new selection, and reimbursing protest costs.
The decision does not establish that PIID 70CDCR24FR0000032 is the protested order, that the five Texas sites are the six service labels in the current award, or that InGenesis performed clinical work inadequately.
The matter does not establish the identity of the current Slice 13 award, current facility coverage, clinical performance, negligence, or patient harm.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Protest denied
GAO found the reviewed proposal evaluation reasonable, including management weaknesses and a deficiency involving required key-personnel resumes.
Proposal weaknesses in a 2016 solicitation do not establish performance under the 2024 award, current staffing levels, contract breach, negligence, or clinical harm.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Protest denied
GAO found ICE reasonably exercised Maxim’s option after considering price, continuity, transition costs, and other factors.
The publicly released decision redacts the specific historical InGenesis performance information considered by ICE. The redactions cannot be filled with speculation or converted into a current performance claim.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Protest denied
The reviewed record gave both firms satisfactory confidence, rated STG’s technical proposal higher, recorded InGenesis’s lower evaluated price, and identified InGenesis recruitment and retention concerns in that procurement.
This non-ICE procurement does not establish current ICE staffing performance, current vacancy rates, clinical negligence, or that STG and InGenesis are one entity.
Figures the agency publishes about its own health programme. They describe the government's operation, not this company's.
Current IHSC scale is agency context, not InGenesis performance data
The existing IHSC program-context source may be reused to explain the agency health system. Its FY2025 people and facility counts are never attributed to InGenesis and do not establish current work under this award.
What these figures are not Agency-wide program figures are not InGenesis patient counts, staffed-site counts, staffing levels, performance metrics, market share, or evidence of current involvement at every site.
FY2025 program statistics
14
What remains unresolved
Questions the reviewed records do not answer, with the evidence that is missing and where we are looking for it.
What this does not establish
An open question records missing evidence. It is not a finding.
ownership control
Who currently owns and controls InGenesis, Inc.?
Why it matters
Historical sources call the company privately held and identify Veronica Edwards as founder/CEO, but current shareholders and control rights are not established.
Missing evidence
Current shareholder or beneficial-owner records; Voting and control rights; Any parent or holding company
Where we are looking
Texas corporate records; SAM responsibility records; company governance documents
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Who currently owns and controls InGenesis, Inc.? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
governance
What is the complete current board and executive roster with effective dates?
Why it matters
The Arizona filing mirror concentrates seven roles in one person and HSI identifies one additional executive, but completeness is not established.
Texas Secretary of State; company governance records; SAM.gov
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What is the complete current board and executive roster with effective dates? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
identity
What is the exact Texas formation identifier and current domestic filing status?
Why it matters
The reviewed packet uses the exact federal identity and an Arizona foreign-registration ID but does not publish an authoritative Texas entity number.
Missing evidence
Texas entity ID; Formation date; Current domestic status
Where we are looking
Texas Secretary of State; Texas Comptroller taxable-entity record
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What is the exact Texas formation identifier and current domestic filing status? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
certification
What exact operations, sites, and dates are covered by InGenesis’s ISO 22956 certificate?
Why it matters
Public pages identify the standard and certifier but not the certificate number, scope, sites, surveillance cycle, or current status.
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What exact operations, sites, and dates are covered by InGenesis’s ISO 22956 certificate? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
certification governance
What impartiality controls governed HSI’s certification of InGenesis while InGenesis leaders participated in HSI governance?
Why it matters
The overlap is documented; the public audit and impartiality file is not.
Missing evidence
Audit team independence; Conflict review; Certification decision record; Recusal or safeguards
Where we are looking
HSI and ANAB records; certification audit file
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What impartiality controls governed HSI’s certification of InGenesis while InGenesis leaders participated in HSI governance? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
facility identity
What exact canonical facilities correspond to Buffalo, Caroline, Elizabeth, Folkston, Krome, and Varick in the award descriptions?
Why it matters
The award uses short labels; some may map to known sites, but the packet does not authorize name-only joins.
Missing evidence
Full PWS site names and addresses; Canonical facility IDs; Effective dates
Where we are looking
ICE task-order file; PWS; staffing matrices
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What exact canonical facilities correspond to Buffalo, Caroline, Elizabeth, Folkston, Krome, and Varick in the award descriptions? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
award allocation
How are award obligations, outlays, labor hours, and positions allocated among the six named sites?
Why it matters
The public award record names sites but supplies no site-level amounts or hours.
Missing evidence
CLIN/task-order allocation; Invoices; Labor-hour reports; Site staffing budgets
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: How are award obligations, outlays, labor hours, and positions allocated among the six named sites? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
staffing performance
What positions, disciplines, authorized staffing, vacancies, backfill rates, and shift coverage existed at each site?
Why it matters
A staffing award does not expose actual staffing performance.
Missing evidence
Position roster; Authorized and filled FTE; Vacancy/backfill data; Credential and shift reports
Where we are looking
ICE/IHSC staffing reports; contract deliverables; quality assurance records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What positions, disciplines, authorized staffing, vacancies, backfill rates, and shift coverage existed at each site? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
award lineage
Why does the generated action sequence skip from P00009 to P00011?
Why it matters
The reviewed public action history contains eleven actions but no P00010.
Missing evidence
Missing, cancelled, superseded, rejected, or non-public modification record
Where we are looking
USAspending raw history; FPDS; ICE contract file
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Why does the generated action sequence skip from P00009 to P00011? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
accounting
What accounts for the $27,739,403.63 difference between obligation and reported outlay?
Why it matters
The source records two fields but no invoice, completion, payment-timing, or closeout explanation.
Missing evidence
Invoices; Payment history; Accruals; Deobligations; Closeout status
Where we are looking
USAspending; ICE finance and contract records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What accounts for the $27,739,403.63 difference between obligation and reported outlay? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
award topology
Which legal entities hold the parent IHSC IDIQ contracts and what is the complete task-order topology?
Why it matters
The branch contains STG, Amergis, InGenesis, and Arora task orders, but that is not a complete base-IDIQ awardee map.
Missing evidence
Base IDIQ awards; Awardee list; Ordering ceiling; Task-order relationships
Where we are looking
SAM.gov; FPDS; USAspending; ICE solicitation and award notices
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Which legal entities hold the parent IHSC IDIQ contracts and what is the complete task-order topology? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
procurement remedy
What happened after GAO sustained B-422389.2, and is the current award related to that remedy?
Why it matters
GAO recommended reopening the five-site competition, but the current award identity and remedy chronology are not established.
Missing evidence
Corrective-action record; New selection decision; Termination action; Task-order PIIDs
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What happened after GAO sustained B-422389.2, and is the current award related to that remedy? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
performance oversight
Do any 2017 proposal-evaluation issues recur in current contract-performance records?
Why it matters
The GAO decision is proposal-specific and cannot be carried forward without current evidence.
Missing evidence
Current quality assurance, staffing and performance records
Where we are looking
ICE contract file; CPARS where public; oversight reports
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Do any 2017 proposal-evaluation issues recur in current contract-performance records? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
historical awards
What sites and performance history belonged to historical contract VHSCECR-12-F-00048?
Why it matters
GAO confirms the contract but describes locations generically and redacts specific performance information.
Missing evidence
Full award and modifications; Site list; Unredacted or releasable performance record
Where we are looking
ICE contract file; USAspending/FPDS archive; records requests
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What sites and performance history belonged to historical contract VHSCECR-12-F-00048? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
joint venture
Does InGenesis STGi Partners, LLC still exist or hold current awards?
Why it matters
The 2011 joint venture is historical; no current status or award was established.
Missing evidence
Current registration; Ownership; Awards; Dissolution or inactive status
Where we are looking
State records; SAM.gov; USAspending
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Does InGenesis STGi Partners, LLC still exist or hold current awards? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
What was the exact InGenesis-Arora joint-venture structure, and does it relate to current IHSC task orders?
Why it matters
A secondary corporate lead exists, but exact current legal and federal-award relationships are unresolved.
Missing evidence
Formation and governance records; SAM identifiers; IDIQ/task-order records
Where we are looking
Texas records; SAM.gov; ICE procurement file
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What was the exact InGenesis-Arora joint-venture structure, and does it relate to current IHSC task orders? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
labor
Does the Schofield Barracks bargaining unit remain represented, and are there other current InGenesis units or labor matters?
Why it matters
The reviewed NLRB case establishes one historical certification only.
Missing evidence
Current certification status; Collective bargaining agreement; Other NLRB cases
Where we are looking
NLRB; union and company records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: Does the Schofield Barracks bargaining unit remain represented, and are there other current InGenesis units or labor matters? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
political finance
What lobbying, political-finance, and government-relations activity is attributable to the exact entity or verified leaders?
Why it matters
The Slice 13 source set is not a complete political or lobbying search.
Missing evidence
LDA filings; FEC and state contributions; Retained firms; Government contacts
Where we are looking
LDA; FEC; state systems; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 13 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts branch surfaces: What lobbying, political-finance, and government-relations activity is attributable to the exact entity or verified leaders? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap. It is not a finding that misconduct, compromised certification, hidden ownership, inadequate care, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
15
Corrections to this record
Append-only. The timeline gives each correction's exact discovery and publication time and the dates of the sources behind it; the ledger below keeps the previous value visible beside the corrected one.
Discovered August 28, 2026, 18:10 UTC · Published August 28, 2026, 19:00 UTC
factual correction · facilityCounts, facilitySummary, award facility presentation
Six service-site labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations and zero facility financial links are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed. Correcting the count does not establish that every label maps to a unique directory row, that each site was staffed throughout, or that money can be assigned to a site.
The source reports $66,214,267.86 obligated and $38,474,864.23 outlayed, a difference of $27,739,403.63. The reviewed record does not explain the difference. The difference does not establish unpaid work, outstanding invoices, savings, waste, profit, overbilling, fraud, refund, or final closeout balance.
"Zero facilities named; one unmatched facility record."
Now recorded
"Six service-site labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations and zero facility financial links are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed."
The current public contractor route reports zero facilities named and one unmatched facility, while the award description explicitly lists six service-site labels from P00004 onward.
Six service-site labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations and zero facility financial links are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed. Correcting the count does not establish that every label maps to a unique directory row, that each site was staffed throughout, or that money can be assigned to a site.
Discovered August 28, 2026 · Published August 28, 2026
"The source reports $66,214,267.86 obligated and $38,474,864.23 outlayed, a difference of $27,739,403.63. The reviewed record does not explain the difference."
Current copy says outlay reporting lags obligation, presenting an unsupported explanation for the $27,739,403.63 difference.
The source reports $66,214,267.86 obligated and $38,474,864.23 outlayed, a difference of $27,739,403.63. The reviewed record does not explain the difference. The difference does not establish unpaid work, outstanding invoices, savings, waste, profit, overbilling, fraud, refund, or final closeout balance.
Discovered August 28, 2026 · Published August 28, 2026
Edges are drawn only from records cited on this site: award recipients, parent recipients, awarding agency, and named performance locations. There is no influence score, no lobbying edge without a filing, and no edge inferred from timing or name similarity. A missing edge means no source, not no relationship.
17
Corporate case-file sources
Every source cited by the corporate sections above, once each.
18
Sources
Award figures retrieved from the USAspending.gov API on 2026-08-20. Amounts are nominal US dollars as reported by the awarding agency.