What public records establish about B.I. Incorporated: a wholly owned GEO subsidiary that provides electronic monitoring and community supervision, the exact recipient of the closed-out ISAP IV order in this dataset, a successor ISAP contract announced for October 2025, a separate skip-tracing contract, a 2011 acquisition history, a disclosed 2025 related-party consulting agreement, and unresolved questions about participant-level technology, data governance, oversight and successor award instruments.
Corporate family A reviewed record places this award recipient under GEO Group. Listed subsidiary as of December 31, 2025; the exhibit says listed subsidiaries are held directly or indirectly at 100% unless otherwise stated. The parent's securities, ownership, obligations and liabilities are not attributed to this recipient, and the awards on this page are not attributed to the parent.
What these records do not establish The records do not establish how many people were enrolled in supervision, what technology was used on any person, or for how long. The parent recipient reported on this award is THE GEO GROUP, INC. That parent relationship is reported by the award record itself; nothing here establishes how the two entities divide work.
01
Who this company is on the record
Identity, registered identifiers and address, as published in the cited records.
Legal name
B.I. Incorporated
Legal form and jurisdiction
corporation · Colorado
Lifecycle status
active
Unique Entity ID (UEI)
PKK6L9KLMYR5
USAspending recipient identifier. The UEI does not establish all contracts, ownership directness, or program performance.
foreign registration
F95000000233
Florida Department of State. A Florida registration number is not a federal award identifier.
Registry identifier
84-0769926
Florida Department of State FEI/EIN as published. The identifier does not establish ownership, payment routing, or tax treatment.
Also filed as
B.I. INCORPORATED · BI INCORPORATED OF COLORADO · BI Incorporated
Spellings and brands carried for the same legal entity in the cited records. A different spelling is not a different company, and a brand is not a subsidiary.
Principal executive office
6265 Gunbarrel Avenue Suite B, Boulder, Colorado 80301
Corporate address as published in this record. Registries print more than one address for this company, and none is selected here as the definitive current headquarters. Not a detention facility.
Address as published
4955 Technology Way, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Corporate address as published in this record. Registries print more than one address for this company, and none is selected here as the definitive current headquarters. Not a detention facility.
Completeness
Partial dossier
Reviewed scope covers identity reconciliation, parent relationship, state registration, two locations, 21 current-at-source roles, one closed-out award with 12 actions, four corporate/financial events, one procurement matter, one federal oversight matter, 13 open questions, and one append-only copy correction. It is not a complete participant, technology-deployment, data-governance, lobbying, state/local contract, governance or successor-award census. Reviewed August 24, 2026.
Company websiteA company website is a party source, not independent verification.
Service scope and product capabilities as the company and the programme page publish them, kept apart from what any award bought.
Where this work sits The Intensive Supervision Appearance Program is community supervision outside detention. The award recorded here names no facility, and its money is never added to detention, bed-cost or operator totals on this site.
The company describes itself as a provider of electronic monitoring and community-supervision services and technology for public-sector agencies, including case management and monitoring support centres, with products it says are manufactured in the United States.
GPS location monitoring
Radio-frequency monitoring
Alcohol monitoring
Smartphone and mobile check-in applications
Case-management and supervision-support services
What the capability list does not establish This list is what the company publishes about its own products. It does not establish which technology ICE assigned to any person under this programme, for how long, what data were collected, or how any device performed.
03
Corporate-family relationships
Relationships established by the cited corporate and registry records, each bounded by what that record states. A parent relationship transfers no award, facility role, workforce conduct, legal matter, or liability.
Recorded corporate parent (1)
THE GEO GROUP, INC.
corporation · Florida · 100% direct or indirect · Directness not established
Listed subsidiary as of December 31, 2025; the exhibit says listed subsidiaries are held directly or indirectly at 100% unless otherwise stated.
Names, titles and dates exactly as the cited records publish them. A title establishes no participation in a contract, a subsidiary's work, or a government decision.
Board recorded at the annual meeting (3)
Names and titles as published in the cited proxy statement and voting-results filing.
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Derrick Schofield
VP, Reentry Services
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Beth A. Crews
VP, Asst. Secretary
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Fouad Hamdun
VP, Community Solutions
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Shayn March
Treasurer, VP
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Amber Martin
VP, Contract Administration
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Robert Murnock
VP, Partnership Development
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Jeff McGee
VP, ISAP Services, Program Director
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Dennis Jesielowski
VP, COO
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Wayne Calabrese
President, Director
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Henry Conforti
VP, Protocol Operations, B.I. Incorporated, GEO Care
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Daniel Friend
VP, CFO
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Isabel Yang
Executive Vice President
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Steven Albertson
Vice President - Finance
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Mark Suchinski
VP, Finance
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Pravin Chaubey
VP, Hardware Engineering
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Paul Beckford
VP, Software, IT & Security
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
Jennifer Houston
VP, Client Relations
Reported in the cited filing; no end date established
05
Selected corporate events
Each amount keeps its own meaning and its own line. A sale price, an accounting gain, a repayment and a repurchase are different objects and are never added together.
GEO acquisition of BII Holding / B.I. Incorporated
business acquisition · closed · Event February 10, 2011 · Announced December 21, 2010
Recorded for B.I. Incorporated · THE GEO GROUP, INC.
GEO completed the acquisition on February 10, 2011 through a merger involving BII Holding, then the indirect owner of 100% of BI. Historical SEC filings report different transaction-accounting figures under different semantics.
Merger consideration announced/initially reported, excluding transaction expenses and subject to adjustments
$415,000,000.00 USD
Source-reported
Historical transaction consideration; not a present valuation.
Later reported cash merger consideration excluding cash acquired and transaction expenses after adjustments
$409,600,000.00 USD
Source-reported
Later SEC accounting presentation; never summed with the initial figure.
The event does not establish current standalone BI valuation, current direct ownership chain, or government spending.
corporate history · active-at-source · Event October 1, 2025 · Announced September 30, 2025
Recorded for B.I. Incorporated
GEO announced on September 30, 2025 that wholly owned BI received a new two-year ICE contract, inclusive of option periods, for continued electronic monitoring, case management and supervision under ISAP; initial term began October 1, 2025 with one additional one-year option.
Does not establish the successor PIID, obligation, outlay, ceiling, exercised option, participant count, or that branch award amounts should be rolled forward.
corporate history · active-at-source · Event December 16, 2025 · Announced December 22, 2025
Recorded for B.I. Incorporated
GEO's 2025 Form 10-K says wholly owned BI received a two-year ICE skip-tracing contract effective December 16, 2025. It describes enhanced location research using identifiable information, commercial data verification, physical observation and alternative-address investigation for people on the non-detained docket.
Does not establish the exact federal award instrument, spending, a link to a particular person, or that skip tracing is the same program as ISAP.
Guidepost consulting agreement disclosed as related-party transaction
other · closed · Event December 31, 2025 · Announced April 6, 2026
Recorded for B.I. Incorporated
GEO's 2026 proxy says Guidepost, whose CEO Julie Myers Wood is a GEO director and former head of ICE, had a consulting agreement with BI. BI paid $420,000 in aggregate during 2025; the most recent monthly retainer was $35,000; the agreement was not extended past December 31, 2025.
Aggregate amount BI paid under Guidepost consulting agreement during 2025
$420,000.00 USD
Source-reported · Period January 1, 2025 → December 31, 2025
Related-party disclosure amount; not characterized by the source as lobbying or award-related.
Most recent monthly retainer reported in the 2026 proxy
$35,000.00 USD
Source-reported · Period open → December 31, 2025
A component/retainer rate, not an additional amount to add to the annual aggregate.
Does not establish impropriety, lobbying, influence, access, award causation, procurement participation, or a BI role for Julie Myers Wood.
Represented in this dataset. Not company revenue, not total federal business, not market share.
Award records held
1
Current award value
$270,442,488.54
Base and exercised options on 1 of 1 awards. Not cash paid.
Obligated
$270,442,488.54
Legally committed on 1 of 1 awards.
Outlayed
$270,442,578.35
Cash disbursed across all 1 awards.
Potential value
$270,442,488.54
Ceiling if every option is exercised. It may never be reached.
Facilities named in these awards
0
Only where the award description names the facility and a reviewer matched it.
Awards naming an unmatched facility
0
The record names a facility; no confirmed directory row exists in this extract.
Awards identifying no facility
1
Counted here rather than assigned to a site on a guess.
Earliest to latest period
Aug 01, 2024 → Sep 30, 2025
Across the awards held here, not the recipient's full contracting history.
Entity resolution: The parent recipient reported on this award is THE GEO GROUP, INC. That parent relationship is reported by the award record itself; nothing here establishes how the two entities divide work.
07
When these awards run
One row per award, spanning only the period the source reports. Bar length encodes time, never money.
Current period of performance
Potential period if options are exercised
A dated contract action
Source: USAspending.gov, retrieved 2026-08-20. Bar length encodes time only. It carries no information about amount.
Award periods as a table (1)
Reported period of performance and current value for each award
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION APPEARANCE PROGRAM (ISAP IV)
Obligated $270,442,488.54 · Outlayed $270,442,578.35 · 12 contract actions · Period to September 30, 2025
Facility: The record does not identify a facility — The order funds the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, a nationwide supervision programme conducted outside detention facilities. It names no facility. The record does not identify a facility. Place of performance, city and area of responsibility are not facility identity.
A facility appears here only where the award's own description names it. Nothing is inferred from a recipient's known portfolio.
No award record held for this recipient names a facility that matches a row in this project's ICE directory extract. That is a limit of the records indexed here, not a finding that the recipient operates no facility.
The records for 70CDCR24FR0000049 do not identify a facility. Those awards are excluded from every facility total on this site.
10
Action-to-evidence crosswalk
Each contract action beside the source registry entry it was read from, the retrieval provenance of that snapshot, and the recorded corporate relationships whose own period contains the action date.
Recorded relationships in effect on this action date
No recorded relationship has a period containing this action date.
Period not established, so coverage of this action is not established: THE GEO GROUP, INC.
The crosswalk states where each action was read from and which recorded relationships were in effect on its date. A relationship in effect on an action date did not thereby sign, price, perform, receive, or benefit from that action, and no money on an action is assigned to a related entity, a person, a facility, or a service location.
11
Every contract action on this award
One row per action the award record reports, in date order, with the obligation each action moved and the running total. Select a modification number to read the exact source fields behind that row.
70CDCR24FR0000049 · 12 contract actions
Cumulative reported obligation
Current value (exercised options) — $270,442,488.54
Cash outlayed to date, as of 2026-08-20 — $270,442,578.35
Source: USAspending.gov award 70CDCR24FR0000049, retrieved 2026-08-20. Unit: US dollars, nominal, not inflation-adjusted.
The line steps only on dates the source records. Cash outlay is reported as a single to-date total with no action-level dates, so it is drawn as one marker at the retrieval date and never as a line across time. Each action mark is keyboard focusable.
Contract actions as a table (12) — select a modification for its evidence trace
Every contract action reported for award 70CDCR24FR0000049
Action date
Mod
Action
This action
Cumulative obligation
Jul 30, 2024
DELIVERY ORDER
$46,503,027.00
$46,503,027.00
Aug 23, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$34,039,522.49
$80,542,549.49
Sep 18, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$19,165,274.75
$99,707,824.24
Sep 25, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$2,200,000.00
$101,907,824.24
Sep 30, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$342,921.33
$102,250,745.57
Sep 30, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$23,784.66
$102,274,530.23
Oct 24, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$30,339,560.00
$132,614,090.23
Nov 29, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$466,062.24
$133,080,152.47
Feb 07, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$59,477,400.00
$192,557,552.47
Jun 06, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$18,349,546.68
$210,907,099.15
Sep 26, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$59,741,224.35
$270,648,323.50
Aug 17, 2026
CLOSE OUT
-$205,834.96
$270,442,488.54
12
Legal and oversight record
Procedural posture as the cited records state it. A vote, a filing account or an inquiry is not a finding of wrongdoing.
G4S protest of ISAP II award to BI
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-401694; B-401694.2 · Closed November 4, 2009 · Status as of November 4, 2009
Protest denied
Parties as published
G4S Government Services — Protester
BI Incorporated — Awardee
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Agency
Procedural record
November 4, 2009 · decision
GAO denied the protest challenging ICE's award of the ISAP II contract to BI.
ICE did not fully assess the contractor against all contract performance standards
GAO found ICE conducted some contractor oversight but did not fully assess performance against all standards or sufficiently follow up and document resolution of identified issues.
The oversight gap does not establish that BI failed every or any particular standard; it establishes that ICE lacked sufficient information and documentation to make that assessment comprehensively.
Several contractor-oversight recommendations remained open in 2026
In the reviewed GAO status page, recommendations 6, 7, 8 and 9 remained open, while recommendations 1 and 10 were closed as implemented. GAO continued to report missing or insufficient information for full contractor-performance assessment and documented follow-up.
Open recommendations are not findings of BI misconduct and do not establish that every original condition remains unchanged.
Questions the reviewed records do not answer, with the evidence that is missing and where we are looking for it.
What this does not establish
An open question records missing evidence. It is not a finding.
ownership
What is the exact current intermediate ownership chain between The GEO Group, Inc. and B.I. Incorporated?
Why it matters
GEO's Exhibit 21 establishes direct-or-indirect 100% ownership but does not establish directness or intermediate entities.
Missing evidence
Current intermediate ownership records; Current BII Holding status
Where we are looking
SEC exhibits; Colorado corporate records; GEO legal-entity records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What is the exact current intermediate ownership chain between The GEO Group, Inc. and B.I. Incorporated? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
governance
What is BI's complete current board and executive roster, with effective dates?
Why it matters
The Florida foreign-registration roster lists 21 people but does not establish role start dates or prove completeness across jurisdictions.
Colorado Secretary of State; BI governance records; GEO legal records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What is BI's complete current board and executive roster, with effective dates? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
award coverage
What exact federal award instrument implements the successor ISAP contract effective October 1, 2025?
Why it matters
Company-filed sources establish the successor contract but not PIID, obligations, outlays, ceiling or modification history.
Missing evidence
PIID/IDV; Award values; Actions; Option exercise status
Where we are looking
USAspending; FPDS; ICE contract file; SAM.gov
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What exact federal award instrument implements the successor ISAP contract effective October 1, 2025? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
What exact federal award instrument and spending implement BI's December 2025 skip-tracing contract?
Why it matters
The 10-K establishes the contract and scope, not the federal instrument or posted spending.
Missing evidence
PIID/IDV; Award amount; Task orders; Performance dates
Where we are looking
USAspending; FPDS; ICE contract file
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What exact federal award instrument and spending implement BI's December 2025 skip-tracing contract? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
technology deployment
Which BI technologies were actually assigned under each ISAP modality and period?
Why it matters
BI's product catalogue and parent disclosures list multiple technologies, but product availability is not person-level or contract-level deployment evidence.
Missing evidence
Device/app assignment rules; Counts by modality; Change history
Where we are looking
ICE program records; Contract deliverables; BI reports
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: Which BI technologies were actually assigned under each ISAP modality and period? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
data governance
What data does each ISAP technology collect, retain, share and expose to ICE or third parties, and under what retention/security rules?
Why it matters
Public product pages establish capabilities but not the complete federal data-governance contract.
Missing evidence
Data dictionary; Retention schedule; Access controls; Sharing rules; Audit logs
Where we are looking
ICE PIA/SORN; contract security exhibits; BI privacy/security documents
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What data does each ISAP technology collect, retain, share and expose to ICE or third parties, and under what retention/security rules? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
oversight
What is the current implementation status of GAO recommendations 2–9, especially contractor-performance recommendations 6–9?
Why it matters
GAO continues to update statuses; several remained open in 2026.
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What is the current implementation status of GAO recommendations 2–9, especially contractor-performance recommendations 6–9? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
accounting
Why does the August 20, 2026 USAspending snapshot report outlays $89.81 above final obligations after closeout?
Why it matters
The discrepancy is small but real and the project should not silently call the fields equal.
Missing evidence
Raw USAspending action/payment data; Closeout accounting; Rounding/source explanation
Where we are looking
USAspending; FPDS; ICE finance/contract file
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: Why does the August 20, 2026 USAspending snapshot report outlays $89.81 above final obligations after closeout? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
workforce
What is BI's current workforce size and definition?
Why it matters
BI says it employs more than 1,000 professionals; the September 2025 GEO release described close to 1,000 employees across approximately 100 offices.
Missing evidence
As-of dates; Employee/contractor scope; ISAP-only versus total workforce
Where we are looking
BI HR disclosure; GEO filings; contract staffing records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What is BI's current workforce size and definition? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
related party
What services did Guidepost provide BI under the consulting agreement that ended December 31, 2025?
Why it matters
The GEO proxy reports amounts and relationship but not enough scope to infer lobbying, procurement or ICE-related work.
Missing evidence
Statement of work; Invoices; Engagement dates; Procurement/ICE scope
Where we are looking
GEO Audit Committee records; Guidepost/BI contract; public records
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What services did Guidepost provide BI under the consulting agreement that ended December 31, 2025? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
contract coverage
What is BI's complete state and local supervision, electronic-monitoring and reentry contract universe?
Why it matters
BI describes work with more than 1,000 agencies but the federal award ledger is not a state/local contract census.
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What is BI's complete state and local supervision, electronic-monitoring and reentry contract universe? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
political finance
What lobbying, political-finance and government-relations activity is attributable specifically to BI rather than inherited from GEO?
Why it matters
Parent-company lobbying must not be inherited by a subsidiary without exact entity evidence.
Missing evidence
Federal/state lobbying; Political contributions; Retained firms
Where we are looking
LDA; FEC; state lobbying systems; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What lobbying, political-finance and government-relations activity is attributable specifically to BI rather than inherited from GEO? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
human impact
What are the measurable participant outcomes and burdens by ISAP modality, including errors, device failures, false alerts, stigma, accessibility and service referrals?
Why it matters
Contract and product records do not establish individual experience or causal outcomes.
GAO; DHS OIG/CRCL; academic research; court records; records requests
Searches recorded
August 24, 2026 — Slice 9 reviewed source set and current branch: What are the measurable participant outcomes and burdens by ISAP modality, including errors, device failures, false alerts, stigma, accessibility and service referrals? (partial). Supported facts are published; unresolved remainder retained.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that misconduct, hidden surveillance, improper influence, or an undisclosed relationship exists.
14
Corrections to this record
Append-only. The timeline gives each correction's exact discovery and publication time and the dates of the sources behind it; the ledger below keeps the previous value visible beside the corrected one.
Discovered August 24, 2026, 00:00 UTC · Published August 24, 2026, 00:00 UTC
factual correction · headline, deck, plainSummary
Reader-facing copy reports both exact figures and states that outlay is $89.81 above final obligation in the source snapshot; the project does not reconcile the discrepancy. The discrepancy does not establish overpayment, fraud, accounting error, or the reason for the source difference.
"Reader-facing copy described outlay as matching obligation / fully paid out."
Now recorded
"Reader-facing copy reports both exact figures and states that outlay is $89.81 above final obligation in the source snapshot; the project does not reconcile the discrepancy."
The current reader-facing receipt says outlay matches obligation / is fully paid out. The preserved USAspending snapshot reports $270,442,578.35 outlay and $270,442,488.54 obligation, a difference of $89.81. The raw values remain unchanged; copy should state the discrepancy rather than round it into equality.
Reader-facing copy reports both exact figures and states that outlay is $89.81 above final obligation in the source snapshot; the project does not reconcile the discrepancy. The discrepancy does not establish overpayment, fraud, accounting error, or the reason for the source difference.
Discovered August 24, 2026 · Published August 24, 2026
Edges are drawn only from records cited on this site: award recipients, parent recipients, awarding agency, and named performance locations. There is no influence score, no lobbying edge without a filing, and no edge inferred from timing or name similarity. A missing edge means no source, not no relationship.
16
Corporate case-file sources
Every source cited by the corporate sections above, once each.
17
Sources
Award figures retrieved from the USAspending.gov API on 2026-08-20. Amounts are nominal US dollars as reported by the awarding agency.