What public records establish about The Arora Group, Inc.: an active Maryland healthcare-staffing corporation, exact recipient of one represented ICE medical-staffing task order, five named but unallocated service-location labels, current and historical company leadership, shared federal healthcare contract vehicles, four historical procurement decisions, and unresolved questions about ownership, complete governance, site mappings, staffing levels, clinical outcomes, certification scope, joint ventures, political activity, and award accounting.
What these records do not establish The record does not establish which facilities those labels mean, how the money divides among them, or what care was delivered under this task order. The award description reads 'medical staffing services' and, from modification P00006, names Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena and Tacoma. Those are service-location labels, not resolved facilities.
01
Who this company is on the record
Identity, registered identifiers and address, as published in the cited records.
Legal name
The Arora Group, Inc.
Display name
The Arora Group
Legal form and jurisdiction
Corporation · Maryland
Lifecycle status
active
Registry identifier
F18000004172
Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations. The state filing number is not a federal award identifier or ownership record.
Registry identifier
52-1919194
Florida Department of State FEI/EIN as published. The identifier does not establish equity ownership, tax treatment of a transaction, or payment routing.
CAGE code
0Y4G6
Secondary federal-award and registration mirror. The secondary record does not replace an official DLA or SAM record and does not establish current registration status beyond its source snapshot.
Also filed as
THE ARORA GROUP, INC. · The Arora Group
Spellings and brands carried for the same legal entity in the cited records. A different spelling is not a different company, and a brand is not a subsidiary.
Principal executive office
903 Russell Avenue, 4th Floor, Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Corporate office as published in the cited filings. Not a detention facility.
Completeness
Partial dossier
Reviewed scope covers exact identity, three additional identifiers, one corporate address and website, five people, eleven roles, six corporate/current-activity records, one frozen ICE task order with twelve runtime actions, five named service labels, four historical GAO matters, eighteen open questions, four quarantined research leads, thirty-six withheld inferences, and two corrections. It is not a complete ownership, governance, IDIQ, facility, staffing, clinician, certification, legal, lobbying, political-finance, or clinical-outcome census. Reviewed August 28, 2026.
Company websiteA company website is a party source, not independent verification.
Names, titles and dates exactly as the cited records publish them. A title establishes no participation in a contract, a subsidiary's work, or a government decision.
Board recorded at the annual meeting (1)
Names and titles as published in the cited proxy statement and voting-results filing.
Ended before the review date · From January 1, 2010 · To December 31, 2021
Kamni Arora
Controller and General Manager
Ended before the review date · From January 1, 1997 · To January 1, 2006
Terrence Gonzalez
Recruiter
Ended before the review date · From January 1, 2019 · To January 1, 2021
03
Selected corporate events
Each amount keeps its own meaning and its own line. A sale price, an accounting gain, a repayment and a repurchase are different objects and are never added together.
Company reports Joint Commission healthcare-staffing certification since 2007
corporate history · current-at-source · Event January 1, 2007
Recorded for The Arora Group, Inc.
Arora states that it has maintained the Joint Commission Gold Seal for healthcare staffing since 2007 and publishes quality and patient-safety reporting channels.
The reviewed record does not include the current certificate, certification scope, survey findings, complaint history, decision file, or evidence that the certification covers this ICE task order or every named service location.
InGenesis Arora Joint Venture registered in Florida
corporate history · historical-observation · Event February 16, 2018
Recorded for The Arora Group, Inc. · org-ingenesis · org-ingenesis-arora-joint-venture
Florida's foreign-LLC record identifies InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC as a Texas entity and lists InGenesis, Inc. and The Arora Group, Inc. as members. The Florida registration was filed February 16, 2018 and withdrawn December 3, 2018.
The record does not establish the Texas formation date, ownership percentages, operating agreement, current status, federal awards, task orders, or that either member inherits the other's award, legal, or clinical records.
Arora receives a position on ICE's medical-staffing IDIQ
corporate history · current-at-source · Event August 25, 2023 · Announced August 31, 2023
Recorded for The Arora Group, Inc.
Arora announced selection to a multiple-award ICE medical-staffing vehicle supporting 24/7/365 healthcare staffing nationwide. The vehicle maximum is shared across awardees.
The vehicle ceiling is not Arora task-order money, obligation, outlay, revenue, market share, or evidence that Arora staffed every ICE facility.
joint venture formation · current-at-source · No event date stated · Announced May 8, 2025
Recorded for The Arora Group, Inc.
Arora described Compass Arora JV as a joint venture with Compass Government Solutions and reported that it received preaward notification for the MQS2-NG small-business pool.
The record does not establish the JV's formation date, legal form, ownership percentages, UEI, executed award, task orders, current status, or a relationship to the ICE task order.
Represented in this dataset. Not company revenue, not total federal business, not market share.
Award records held
1
Current award value
$132,521,769.03
Base and exercised options on 1 of 1 awards. Not cash paid.
Obligated
$91,104,688.16
Legally committed on 1 of 1 awards.
Outlayed
$61,375,357.06
Cash disbursed across all 1 awards.
Potential value
$236,310,734.63
Ceiling if every option is exercised. It may never be reached.
Facilities named in these awards
0
Only where the award description names the facility and a reviewer matched it.
Awards naming an unmatched facility
0
The record names a facility; no confirmed directory row exists in this extract.
Awards identifying no facility
1
Counted here rather than assigned to a site on a guess.
Earliest to latest period
Aug 01, 2024 → Jul 31, 2027
Across the awards held here, not the recipient's full contracting history.
Entity resolution: The award description reads 'medical staffing services' and, from modification P00006, names Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena and Tacoma. Those are service-location labels, not resolved facilities.
05
When these awards run
One row per award, spanning only the period the source reports. Bar length encodes time, never money.
Current period of performance
Potential period if options are exercised
A dated contract action
Source: USAspending.gov, retrieved 2026-08-20. Bar length encodes time only. It carries no information about amount.
Award periods as a table (1)
Reported period of performance and current value for each award
Obligated $91,104,688.16 · Outlayed $61,375,357.06 · 12 contract actions · Period to July 31, 2027
Facility: The record does not identify a facility — Medical staffing services. The record does not identify a facility. The record does not identify a facility. Place of performance, city and area of responsibility are not facility identity.
A facility appears here only where the award's own description names it. Nothing is inferred from a recipient's known portfolio.
No award record held for this recipient names a facility that matches a row in this project's ICE directory extract. That is a limit of the records indexed here, not a finding that the recipient operates no facility.
The award description does name places: 5 service-site labels appear from modification P00006 onward. A short label is not a confirmed directory row and carries no amount, so the count above stays at the facilities a reviewer matched. The labels are listed in full below.
The records for 70CDCR24FR0000035 do not identify a facility. Those awards are excluded from every facility total on this site.
10
Service-site labels named in the award
The award's own description names these places. It attaches no amount to any of them, and a short label is not a directory row.
70CDCR24FR0000035 · named from modification P00006, Aug 01, 2025
Alexandria
Eloy
Florence
Jena
Tacoma
From modification P00006 onward the award's own description names five service-location labels. The record attaches no amount to any of them.
Service-site labels named
5
Counted from the award description, not from a facility directory.
Site-level dollar allocations
0
The record apportions no amount to any named site.
Facility financial links
0
No money on this award reaches a facility record here.
Facility roles
0
No facility role is created from a site label.
Operator roles
0
A medical-staffing prime is not the facility operator.
What this does not establish Five labels do not establish five canonical facilities, five directory rows, five dollar allocations, an equal division of the award, continuous staffing at each location, or staffing levels and clinical disciplines anywhere.
08
Action-to-evidence crosswalk
Each contract action beside the source registry entry it was read from, the retrieval provenance of that snapshot, and the recorded corporate relationships whose own period contains the action date.
Recorded relationships in effect on this action date
No recorded relationship has a period containing this action date.
The crosswalk states where each action was read from and which recorded relationships were in effect on its date. A relationship in effect on an action date did not thereby sign, price, perform, receive, or benefit from that action, and no money on an action is assigned to a related entity, a person, a facility, or a service location.
09
Every contract action on this award
One row per action the award record reports, in date order, with the obligation each action moved and the running total. Select a modification number to read the exact source fields behind that row.
70CDCR24FR0000035 · 12 contract actions
Cumulative reported obligation
Potential value (all options) — $236,310,734.63
Current value (exercised options) — $132,521,769.03
Cash outlayed to date, as of 2026-08-20 — $61,375,357.06
Source: USAspending.gov award 70CDCR24FR0000035, retrieved 2026-08-20. Unit: US dollars, nominal, not inflation-adjusted.
The line steps only on dates the source records. Cash outlay is reported as a single to-date total with no action-level dates, so it is drawn as one marker at the retrieval date and never as a line across time. Each action mark is keyboard focusable.
Contract actions as a table (12) — select a modification for its evidence trace
Every contract action reported for award 70CDCR24FR0000035
Action date
Mod
Action
This action
Cumulative obligation
Jul 22, 2024
DELIVERY ORDER
$3,173,611.35
$3,173,611.35
Aug 07, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$500,000.00
$3,673,611.35
Aug 23, 2024
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$3,673,611.35
Nov 05, 2024
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
$0.00
$3,673,611.35
Nov 22, 2024
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$8,409,358.17
$12,082,969.52
Feb 05, 2025
CHANGE ORDER
$8,490,417.14
$20,573,386.66
Aug 01, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$9,114,485.50
$29,687,872.16
Sep 18, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$9,529,350.00
$39,217,222.16
Dec 15, 2025
FUNDING ONLY ACTION
$15,091,070.00
$54,308,292.16
Feb 09, 2026
CHANGE ORDER
$0.00
$54,308,292.16
May 26, 2026
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR WORK WITHIN SCOPE
$11,370,000.00
$65,678,292.16
Jul 27, 2026
EXERCISE AN OPTION
$25,426,396.00
$91,104,688.16
11
What these records do and do not establish
The money figures, the places the work is recorded in, and the limits of a staffing contract as evidence.
Obligation and outlay are two separate fields, and the difference is unexplained
The source reports $91,104,688.16 obligated and $61,375,357.06 outlayed, a difference of $29,729,331.10. The reviewed record does not explain the difference. Current award value ($132,521,769.03) and potential award value ($236,310,734.63) are two further figures, and neither is money committed or paid.
What this does not establish The $29,729,331.10 difference does not establish unpaid completed work, outstanding invoices, unperformed work, savings, waste, contractor profit, overbilling, fraud, a refund, a final closeout balance, or a reporting lag as an established explanation.
Award snapshot retrieved 2026-08-20
Five named service-location labels, no site-level money
The award names five service-location labels: Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena, and Tacoma. It apportions no money among them and does not by itself resolve five canonical facilities.
What this does not establish Naming a city does not establish a canonical facility join, a dollar amount at that location, continuous staffing there, staffing levels, clinical disciplines, or that each label is a single physical facility. The award is never divided by five and no label is joined to a directory row by string match.
Award action descriptions from modification P00006 onward
A medical-staffing award is not a record of care
A medical-staffing award establishes procurement of personnel. It does not establish staffing adequacy, clinician identity, diagnosis, treatment, negligence, injury, death, or patient outcome.
What this does not establish The task order does not establish authorized or filled FTEs, hours by facility, vacancy or backfill rates, shift coverage, disciplines, clinician identity, credentials, diagnosis, treatment, adequacy, negligence, injury, death, preventability, individual responsibility, or facility operation. No Human Cost record is linked to this award.
Shared vehicle ceilings are not Arora money
The ICE and DHA vehicle ceilings are shared procurement ceilings, not Arora obligations, payments, revenue, or market share.
What this does not establish The ICE ceiling exceeding $2.6 billion and the DHA MQS2-NG ceiling of $43 billion are shared procurement maximums. They are not Arora award value, obligation, outlay, revenue, market share, a represented task-order ceiling, or money assigned to the five city labels, and they are never added to task-order figures.
Named roles, unresolved current vice-president title
Current sources establish named company roles but not equity ownership or a complete board. The 2026 Florida filing and company biography conflict on Sam Arora's vice-president title.
What this does not establish The reviewed records do not establish share ownership, ownership percentages, sole control, a complete board, board independence, committees, participation in the ICE award decision, or responsibility for staffing vacancies or any clinical decision. The current vice-president title is published as unresolved, not decided.
Company-reported certification history
Arora reports Joint Commission healthcare-staffing certification since 2007. The reviewed packet does not contain the current certificate, scope, survey findings, or decision file.
What this does not establish The reviewed record does not establish current certificate scope, survey findings, complaint resolution, a certification decision, coverage of this ICE task order or of the five service labels, adequate staffing, clinical quality, or the absence of clinical problems.
Former public service is context, not influence
Sam Arora's former Maryland legislative service and company roles are separately documented facts. They do not establish contact, recusal failure, influence, or award causation.
What this does not establish Temporal overlap between elected office and a company role does not establish lobbying, a campaign-finance relationship, government contact, a recusal failure, an ethics finding, influence over a federal award, or causation. A failed exact-name lobbying or FEC search is not evidence of no activity.
One historical joint venture, kept separate from a similarly named entity
A 2018 Florida filing identifies InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC and lists InGenesis and Arora as members. A separate court record names InGenesis Arora Military, LLC. The reviewed evidence does not establish that they are the same entity, nor does Florida withdrawal establish dissolution, current affiliation, ownership percentages, or award inheritance.
What this does not establish The Florida record does not establish Texas formation or dissolution, ownership percentages, an operating agreement, federal identity, awards, current status, award inheritance, or that InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC and InGenesis Arora Military, LLC are the same entity.
Historical procurement decisions are not current performance
Four GAO decisions from 1999, 2001, 2004 and 2006 record distinct procurement outcomes under different agencies. None of them concerns the represented ICE task order.
What this does not establish A denial is not a performance endorsement, a sustained protest is not an award, a mixed result is not a clinical-quality finding, the 2006 Navy matter creates no current Arora-STG relationship or award inheritance, and no protest win/loss score is constructed.
12
Legal and oversight record
Procedural posture as the cited records state it. A vote, a filing account or an inquiry is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Arora challenge to Army occupational-health procurement
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-280978.3; B-280978.4 · Closed January 27, 1999 · Status as of January 27, 1999
Protest denied
Parties as published
The Arora Group, Inc. — Protester
U.S. Army Medical Command — Agency
Procedural record
January 27, 1999 · decision
GAO denied Arora's challenge after finding the proposal evaluation and cost/technical tradeoff reasonable under the solicitation.
Arora protest of Army outpatient-clinic procurement
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-288127 · Closed September 14, 2001 · Status as of September 14, 2001
Protest sustained
Parties as published
The Arora Group, Inc. — Protester
CRAssociates, Inc. — Awardee
Department of the Army — Agency
Procedural record
September 14, 2001 · decision
GAO sustained the protest because latent solicitation ambiguity led offerors to compete on unequal understandings and recommended clarification, revised proposals, reevaluation, and reimbursement of protest costs.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Protest sustained
GAO sustained the protest because latent solicitation ambiguity led offerors to compete on unequal understandings and recommended clarification, revised proposals, reevaluation, and reimbursement of protest costs.
A sustained protest does not establish that Arora ultimately received or performed the contract, was entitled to every claimed remedy, or should receive favorable treatment later.
A sustained protest does not establish that Arora ultimately received or performed the contract, was entitled to every claimed remedy, or should receive favorable treatment later.
Arora protest of HHS occupational-health staffing award
U.S. Government Accountability Office · B-293102 · Closed February 2, 2004 · Status as of February 2, 2004
Protest sustained in part
Parties as published
The Arora Group — Protester
CasePro, Inc. — Awardee
Department of Health and Human Services — Agency
Procedural record
February 2, 2004 · decision
GAO sustained Arora's challenge to an unreasonable key-personnel certification evaluation, while rejecting other transition-plan and quality-assurance objections.
U.S. Government Accountability Office · court holding · Protest sustained in part
GAO sustained Arora's challenge to an unreasonable key-personnel certification evaluation, while rejecting other transition-plan and quality-assurance objections.
The mixed ruling does not establish that every Arora contention was correct, that Arora received the award, or that current ICE clinical staffing is adequate or inadequate.
The mixed ruling does not establish that every Arora contention was correct, that Arora received the award, or that current ICE clinical staffing is adequate or inadequate.
Figures the agency publishes about its own health programme. They describe the government's operation, not this company's.
Current IHSC scale is agency context, not Arora performance data
The existing IHSC program-context source may be reused to explain the agency health system. Its FY2025 people and facility counts are never attributed to Arora and do not establish current work under this award.
What these figures are not Agency-wide program figures are not Arora patient counts, staffed-site counts, staffing levels, performance metrics, market share, or evidence of involvement at every IHSC location.
FY2025 program statistics
14
What remains unresolved
Questions the reviewed records do not answer, with the evidence that is missing and where we are looking for it.
What this does not establish
An open question records missing evidence. It is not a finding.
ownership control
Who currently owns and controls The Arora Group, Inc.?
Why it matters
Current award, corporate, and leadership records do not disclose shareholders or beneficial owners.
Missing evidence
Shareholder records; Voting and control rights; Any parent or holding company
Where we are looking
Maryland corporate records; SAM responsibility records; company governance records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: Who currently owns and controls The Arora Group, Inc.? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
governance
Who comprises the complete current board and officer roster, and when did each role begin?
Why it matters
The company page and Florida filing provide overlapping but not complete or fully consistent role evidence.
Missing evidence
Complete board and officer roster; Role effective dates; Committee assignments
Where we are looking
Maryland corporate records; company governance records; current annual reports
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: Who comprises the complete current board and officer roster, and when did each role begin? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
governance conflict
Does Sam Arora currently hold the vice-president title printed in the 2026 Florida filing?
Why it matters
The current filing lists VP, while the company biography says his vice-president service ended in 2021.
Missing evidence
Current signed officer certification; Maryland roster; company explanation
Where we are looking
Florida filing image; Maryland corporate record; company governance records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: Does Sam Arora currently hold the vice-president title printed in the 2026 Florida filing? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
identity history
What is the complete official history of Arora's UEI, CAGE, DUNS, SAM, and legal-name identifiers?
Why it matters
The award supplies the UEI and a secondary federal mirror supplies the CAGE, but full official lineage is incomplete.
Missing evidence
Official CAGE record; Historical DUNS; SAM entity history; Name and address changes
Where we are looking
SAM.gov; DLA CAGE records; Maryland corporate records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What is the complete official history of Arora's UEI, CAGE, DUNS, SAM, and legal-name identifiers? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
award coverage
What is the complete awardee and task-order topology of the ICE medical-staffing IDIQ?
Why it matters
Company and secondary records establish a shared vehicle, but not a reviewed complete awardee/order universe.
Missing evidence
All base IDIQ awards; Every task order; Awardee effective dates; Cross-agency ordering authority
Where we are looking
USAspending; FPDS; ICE contract file; SAM.gov
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What is the complete awardee and task-order topology of the ICE medical-staffing IDIQ? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
What is Arora's complete current federal award and vehicle portfolio?
Why it matters
Company announcements establish ICE, DHA, and Coast Guard activity but are not a complete award census.
Missing evidence
Prime awards; Task orders; Subawards; Vehicles; Current periods
Where we are looking
USAspending; FPDS; SAM.gov
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What is Arora's complete current federal award and vehicle portfolio? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
facility resolution
Which exact ICE facilities correspond to Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena, and Tacoma in this task order?
Why it matters
The action descriptions use city labels that may correspond to multiple facilities or program components.
Missing evidence
Task-order site schedule; Facility names and addresses; Effective dates
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: Which exact ICE facilities correspond to Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena, and Tacoma in this task order? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
site accounting
How much obligation, outlay, and current value is attributable to each named service location?
Why it matters
The award combines five labels and does not apportion money.
Missing evidence
CLIN/site pricing; Invoices; Funding by location; Modification allocation
Where we are looking
ICE contract file; invoices; payment records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: How much obligation, outlay, and current value is attributable to each named service location? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
staffing performance
What positions, FTEs, hours, vacancy rates, and backfill performance were required and delivered at each location?
Why it matters
Award amounts and city labels do not establish staffing volume or performance.
Missing evidence
Position rosters; Authorized and filled FTEs; Hours; Vacancies; Backfill metrics
Where we are looking
Task-order staffing plans; monthly reports; ICE oversight records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What positions, FTEs, hours, vacancy rates, and backfill performance were required and delivered at each location? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
clinical staffing
Which clinicians were assigned, credentialed, disciplined, or removed under the order?
Why it matters
Corporate certification and staffing procurement do not expose person-level assignments or credential outcomes.
ICE/IHSC; state licensing boards; contract deliverables
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: Which clinicians were assigned, credentialed, disciplined, or removed under the order? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
accounting
What explains the $29,729,331.10 difference between obligation and reported outlay?
Why it matters
The award snapshot reports both figures but no explanation.
Missing evidence
Payment history; Invoices; Unperformed funded work; Closeout or adjustment records
Where we are looking
USAspending/FPDS refresh; ICE finance and contract files
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What explains the $29,729,331.10 difference between obligation and reported outlay? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
award provenance
What are the exact generated transaction IDs, complete descriptions, and source hash for all twelve actions?
Why it matters
The public page exposes action dates and values but not every generated provenance field.
Missing evidence
Runtime generated rows; Content hash; Raw USAspending actions; Parser manifest
Where we are looking
Current repository; USAspending API; award manifest
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What are the exact generated transaction IDs, complete descriptions, and source hash for all twelve actions? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
certification
What is the current Joint Commission certificate scope, survey history, and complaint record?
Why it matters
The company reports certification since 2007, but the current certificate and survey file were not obtained.
Missing evidence
Certificate; Scope; Survey dates; Findings; Complaint/appeal history
Where we are looking
The Joint Commission; company certification file
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What is the current Joint Commission certificate scope, survey history, and complaint record? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
joint venture
What is Compass Arora JV's exact legal structure, ownership, federal identity, award, and task-order history?
Why it matters
A company announcement identifies the JV and a preaward notification but not the legal or award record.
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What is Compass Arora JV's exact legal structure, ownership, federal identity, award, and task-order history? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
historical joint venture
What were the exact identities, relationships, ownership, award histories, and current status of InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC and InGenesis Arora Military, LLC?
Why it matters
Florida's registry resolves InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC and its two filed members. A separate 2012 court record names InGenesis Arora Military, LLC. The reviewed evidence does not establish that the two legal names refer to one entity.
Missing evidence
Texas formation record for InGenesis Arora Joint Venture, LLC; Formation record for InGenesis Arora Military, LLC; Operating agreements and ownership percentages; Relationship or name-change record between the two entities; UEI/CAGE and federal award histories; Dissolution or current-status records
Where we are looking
Court record; state registry; SAM.gov; federal award records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What was The Arora Group's exact role in InGenesis Arora Military, LLC, and what is that entity's current status? (partial). The Joint Venture entity and filed members are resolved. The Military entity remains a quarantined lead and is not merged.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
public service overlap
What ethics, recusal, or conflict controls applied while Sam Arora served in the Maryland legislature and held a company role?
Why it matters
Temporal overlap is established, but no contract-specific contact or conflict record is.
Missing evidence
Disclosures; Recusal records; Ethics opinions; Government contacts
Where we are looking
Maryland ethics records; legislative disclosures; company records
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What ethics, recusal, or conflict controls applied while Sam Arora served in the Maryland legislature and held a company role? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
political finance
What lobbying, political-finance, and trade-association activity is attributable to the exact company or verified leaders?
Why it matters
The reviewed public-source set found no exact company filing, which is not evidence of no activity.
Missing evidence
Federal/state lobbying; Contributions; PAC or committee relationships; Trade-association activity
Where we are looking
LDA; FEC; Maryland campaign-finance records; company disclosures
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What lobbying, political-finance, and trade-association activity is attributable to the exact company or verified leaders? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
legal coverage
What current labor, employment, licensing, enforcement, and civil-litigation matters are attributable to the exact entity?
Why it matters
The reviewed packet contains historical procurement protests but not a complete current legal census.
Missing evidence
NLRB/EEOC matters; Licensing actions; Civil cases; Settlements; Enforcement records
Where we are looking
NLRB; EEOC; federal and state courts; licensing boards
Searches recorded
August 28, 2026 — Slice 14 reviewed source set and public Detention Receipts surfaces: What current labor, employment, licensing, enforcement, and civil-litigation matters are attributable to the exact entity? (partial). Supported facts are included; the unresolved remainder is preserved.
Status
partially answered
An open question records a gap in reviewed evidence. It is not a finding that hidden ownership, misconduct, clinical failure, improper influence, or an undisclosed transaction exists.
15
Corrections to this record
Append-only. The timeline gives each correction's exact discovery and publication time and the dates of the sources behind it; the ledger below keeps the previous value visible beside the corrected one.
Discovered August 28, 2026, 19:30 UTC · Published August 28, 2026, 21:00 UTC
factual correction · facilityCounts, facilitySummary, award facility presentation
Five service-location labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations, zero facility financial links, zero facility roles, and zero operator roles are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed. Correcting the count does not establish that every label maps to one facility, that each location was staffed throughout, or that money can be assigned to a site.
The source reports $91,104,688.16 obligated and $61,375,357.06 outlayed, a difference of $29,729,331.10. The reviewed record does not explain the difference. The difference does not establish unpaid work, outstanding invoices, unperformed work, savings, waste, profit, overbilling, fraud, refund, or final closeout balance.
"Zero facilities named; the award identifies no site list."
Now recorded
"Five service-location labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations, zero facility financial links, zero facility roles, and zero operator roles are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed."
The contractor route says no facility or site list is named, while award descriptions from P00006 onward explicitly name Alexandria, Eloy, Florence, Jena, and Tacoma.
Five service-location labels are named in the award. Zero site-level dollar allocations, zero facility financial links, zero facility roles, and zero operator roles are established. Canonical facility joins remain separately reviewed. Correcting the count does not establish that every label maps to one facility, that each location was staffed throughout, or that money can be assigned to a site.
Discovered August 28, 2026 · Published August 28, 2026
"The source reports $91,104,688.16 obligated and $61,375,357.06 outlayed, a difference of $29,729,331.10. The reviewed record does not explain the difference."
Current copy says outlay reporting lags obligation, presenting an unsupported explanation for the $29,729,331.10 difference.
The source reports $91,104,688.16 obligated and $61,375,357.06 outlayed, a difference of $29,729,331.10. The reviewed record does not explain the difference. The difference does not establish unpaid work, outstanding invoices, unperformed work, savings, waste, profit, overbilling, fraud, refund, or final closeout balance.
Discovered August 28, 2026 · Published August 28, 2026
Edges are drawn only from records cited on this site: award recipients, parent recipients, awarding agency, and named performance locations. There is no influence score, no lobbying edge without a filing, and no edge inferred from timing or name similarity. A missing edge means no source, not no relationship.
17
Corporate case-file sources
Every source cited by the corporate sections above, once each.
18
Sources
Award figures retrieved from the USAspending.gov API on 2026-08-20. Amounts are nominal US dollars as reported by the awarding agency.