ICE's own fiscal-year average, not a bed count and not a point-in-time headcount.
Average of that population convicted or with pending charges
312.2
ICE's classification, reproduced as published. This is an ICE administrative classification. Pending charges are not convictions, and this field is not population-level crime-rate evidence.
Average length of stay
45.5 days
Guaranteed minimum
800
A population level a contract treats as guaranteed. The workbook prints the number, not the price.
No award record in this dataset names this facility. ICE and its contractors may hold awards covering it that this project has not yet indexed.
A
Accountability dossier
Oversight of this Pennsylvania facility runs through the Detention Ombudsman and the DHS civil rights office rather than the inspector general. A man died here on August 5, 2025; his brother sued for the records ten weeks later, and three members of Congress wrote to ICE in August 2026 after an unannounced visit. No award in this dataset names the facility.
Complete dossier · Last reviewed August 20, 2026
Complete: ombudsman, civil rights, ICE inspection, death and litigation records are indexed with primary sources, with each record's redactions and gaps stated. The money lane is empty because no award record in this dataset names this facility.
Evidence chain · every edge labelled by what the record establishes
01
Public money
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — appropriated detention funding
02
Award
Not established in sources currently indexed
03
Contractor / operator
The GEO Group, Inc. — operator
04
Facility
Moshannon Valley Processing Center
05
Findings
6 published inspection, litigation, and harm records
public money → award · Not established
No federal award record currently indexed in this dataset names this facility.
What this does not establish
The award record does not establish how much has been paid out, nor that the appropriation was passed for this facility specifically.
Harm records indexed here (observed / attributed)
0 / 1
Observed means an official record documents it. Attributed means a named source reached the finding. The two are never summed.
Inspection and oversight records
2
Legal instrument, litigation and complaint records
3
These are counts of records indexed by this project, not counts of everything that happened. They are never summed into a score.
B
Who is involved, and on what basis
Federal agencyU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
No effective period printed in the indexed record
ICE lists the facility in its own detention-management workbook and awards the orders indexed here.
What this does not establish
Agency custody does not establish who owns or operates the physical facility.
GEO's own facility page lists this processing centre and names Clearfield County and ICE as its clients.
What this does not establish
A company listing establishes the company's claim to run the site. It does not establish the contract structure between ICE, Clearfield County and the company, or the current terms.
Money, population, inspections, litigation and harm on one calendar
The facility record beside the money record
Lanes are shown side by side because they share a facility and a calendar, not a cause. Chronological proximity does not establish causation.
Only dated events are plotted. Records carrying an as-of or dataset-cutoff date, such as ICE’s fiscal-year population aggregates, are listed in the table instead, because a data-pull date is not the date something happened.
202220232024202520262027
Money and award actions
No record indexed in this lane
Population and capacity
No record indexed in this lane
Inspections and oversight
Litigation and corrective action
Observed and attributed harm
Select or focus a marker to read the underlying record. Every marker below is also listed in the table.
Facility evidence records by date, lane, evidence status and source.
Date
Lane
Record
Status
Oct 17, 2022
Inspections and oversight
Detention Ombudsman inspection reportThe DHS Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman issued a final inspection report on conditions at this facility, addressed to ICE's then-acting director.DHS Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman
ICE compliance inspection, March 4-6, 2025ICE's Office of Detention Oversight inspected this facility over three days in March 2025.ICE Office of Detention Oversight
Three members of Congress write to ICE after an unannounced visitReporting records that three Pennsylvania members of the House sent letters to ICE and DHS in early August 2026 demanding changes to procedures at this facility, following an unannounced site visit in late May 2026.USA Today Network
Attributed finding
As of Jul 20, 2026
Population and capacity
Fiscal 2026 average daily populationICE reports this facility's average daily population for fiscal 2026 in its detention-management workbook. It is a fiscal-year average, not a bed count and not a headcount on any given day.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Observed / verified
As of Jul 20, 2026
Population and capacity
Fiscal 2026 average length of stayICE reports the average number of days people spent in custody at this facility in fiscal 2026.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Observed / verified
As of Jul 20, 2026
Population and capacity
Contracted guaranteed minimumICE's workbook prints a guaranteed minimum population level for this facility. The workbook prints the number; it does not print the price attached to it.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Observed / verified
D
Inspections, findings and litigation
An ICE compliance rating records the agency's own determination against its detention standards on the inspection dates. It does not establish that no harm or deficiency occurred.
October 17, 2022 · Inspections and oversightObserved / verified
Detention Ombudsman inspection report
The DHS Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman issued a final inspection report on conditions at this facility, addressed to ICE's then-acting director.
Locator
OIDO-23-001
Linked to this facility by
The report names this facility in its title.
What this does not establish
Ombudsman recommendations are not binding. Nothing indexed here establishes whether ICE acted on them.
August 16, 2024 · Litigation and corrective actionObserved / verified
Civil rights office memorandum following an on-site review
The DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties sent ICE leadership a memorandum concerning its on-site review of this facility. The publicly released copy is redacted.
Locator
CRCL memorandum dated August 16, 2024
Procedural status
Memorandum sent to ICE
Linked to this facility by
The memorandum names this facility.
What this does not establish
The redactions mean the findings, recommendations and their status are not established by the copy indexed here.
November 12, 2025 · Litigation and corrective actionAllegation
Family sues for the federal records on the August 2025 death
The brother of the man who died filed a Freedom of Information Act suit in the Southern District of New York seeking DHS and ICE records about the death.
Locator
S.D.N.Y. No. 1:25-cv-09430
Procedural status
Filed November 12, 2025; no disposition indexed here
Linked to this facility by
The complaint concerns a death at this facility.
What this does not establish
This is a records suit. It is not a wrongful-death claim, it asserts no liability, and its allegations are not findings.
August 8, 2026 · Litigation and corrective actionAttributed finding
Three members of Congress write to ICE after an unannounced visit
Reporting records that three Pennsylvania members of the House sent letters to ICE and DHS in early August 2026 demanding changes to procedures at this facility, following an unannounced site visit in late May 2026.
Locator
Press reporting, August 8, 2026
Procedural status
Letters reported sent; no response indexed here
Linked to this facility by
The reporting names this facility.
What this does not establish
The letters themselves are not indexed here, so their text, demands and any response are not established. A congressional letter is not a finding.
August 5, 2025 · Observed and attributed harmAttributed finding
A man died in custody at this facility on August 5, 2025
Chaofeng Ge, 32, died at this facility on August 5, 2025. ICE published a death notification page for the death; at retrieval the page returned unreadable content, so the date and identity here rest on the federal records complaint filed by his brother and on contemporaneous reporting.
Locator
S.D.N.Y. No. 1:25-cv-09430
Procedural status
Cause and manner of death not established in the records indexed here
Linked to this facility by
The complaint and the reporting both name this facility as the place of death and ICE as the custodian.
What this does not establish
No cause or manner of death is established here. Counsel's account, reported in the press, describes how the body was found; that account is an allegation and is not adopted as fact by this dossier. Nothing here attributes the death to the facility, the operator or any care decision.
The DHS Detention Ombudsman inspected this facility and reported to ICE in October 2022.
The DHS civil rights office sent ICE a memorandum about an on-site review of this facility in August 2024.
ICE's own oversight office inspected the facility in March 2025.
A man died in custody at this facility on August 5, 2025, and his brother filed a federal records suit on November 12, 2025.
What this does not establish
A cause or manner of death for the August 2025 death, and no link between that death and the operator, any contract or any care decision.
That any contract action in this dataset paid for operations here.
What the ombudsman, civil rights and ICE inspections found. Redactions and unretrieved text limit each record.
That the congressional letters produced any change; no response is indexed.
Reviewed name matches
Moshannon Valley Correctional Facility — The DHS Detention Ombudsman and ICE's oversight office both use the Philipsburg, Pennsylvania location the ICE workbook records for this facility.
G
Open research questions
These are the gaps the reviewed record set names. A question listed here is unanswered, not answered in the facility's favour, and this list does not claim to cover everything unknown about the facility.
No DHS inspector general report naming this facility was found
Searched — nothing released
On the search date, no inspector general inspection or audit report specific to this facility was located. Federal oversight of this site in the record indexed here runs through the Detention Ombudsman and the civil rights office instead. Locator: DHS OIG report library.
Collection searched · August 20, 2026 · not an event date
What this does not establish
That the inspector general has never examined this facility. Absence in a search is not evidence of absence.
No state agency or county inspection record for this facility was located. Unlike Washington State, Pennsylvania has no indexed statutory inspection regime for private immigration detention in the records searched. Locator: State and county record search.
Collection searched · August 20, 2026 · not an event date
What this does not establish
That no state or county authority inspects this facility. This is the result of a search, not a legal conclusion about jurisdiction.
These are company-wide records. They are not allocated to this facility and do not establish that political activity caused any award or facility decision.